|
Post by overthehill on Jul 18, 2023 11:04:02 GMT
How many of Trump's cases involve debts or unpaid bills I wonder ?
|
|
jcb208
Member of DD Central
Posts: 821
Likes: 608
|
Post by jcb208 on Jul 18, 2023 15:04:38 GMT
Does this person just not understand the word "borrow"? Surprised any company would even lend to him,all they need to do is a quick google which will put an end to loans
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 6,586
|
Post by Mousey on Aug 1, 2023 12:53:13 GMT
It is understood the next hearing in this matter is listed for 04/10/2023 at 10.30am.
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 6,586
|
Post by Mousey on Oct 3, 2023 13:22:28 GMT
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 6,586
|
Post by Mousey on Oct 4, 2023 15:00:34 GMT
Judge James Brightwell explained that this “claim has been pending for a very long time indeed, it really needs listing for trial…whatever happens I’m quite keen for a trial date to be fixed.”
There was first an application for 'security for costs' which was adjourned pending the replacement of the claimants (borrowers) business address with his residential address in a witness statement.
Mr Iain MacDonald, the barrister representing the platform, also drew the courts attention to what he said were problems with the Witness Statement citing "its lateness, its length and its content".
Mr MacDonald said the statement contained "scandalous allegations" which were "palpably untrue" and "self-evidently and provably incorrect when one views the video". The court should treat the statement with "a very great deal of caution" he said.
Mr Richard Roberts, the barrister representing the claimant, confirmed that he didn't seek to rely on what had been described as the "scandalous allegations" at todays hearing.
The "scandalous allegations" made, were in my opinion, astonishing.
I made a request to the court for copies of a document which will enable me to report the matter fully in due course. The parties have been given 14 days to object to my request.
I have plans this afternoon so I won't able to write up other points eg the trial date and costs just yet.
|
|
|
Post by vindhi on Oct 5, 2023 1:21:37 GMT
@mousey
Was there any mention of contempt of court proceedings given that M**** blatantly lied in his most recent witness statement?
|
|
registerme
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,233
Likes: 6,038
|
Post by registerme on Oct 5, 2023 7:56:39 GMT
Are details of the "scandalous allegations" allowed to be reported?
|
|
benaj
Member of DD Central
Posts: 4,911
Likes: 1,612
|
Post by benaj on Oct 5, 2023 8:06:30 GMT
TBH, the title of this thread could have been changed. There’s nothing else for me to cash out from his overdue loans since this Saga brought by the claimant.
A trial date? When’s the repayment date?
My main question, if there’s a contract in place to sell the pawns when borrower can’t repay, “what” exactly is stopping unbolted to sell?
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 6,586
|
Post by Mousey on Oct 5, 2023 9:54:14 GMT
vindhi - There was not discussion of that although it was noted that the statement was accompanied by a signed statement of truth registerme - yes, I intend to accurately and fairly report what was said. This will be much easier if/when I receive the document concerned
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,665
Likes: 2,989
|
Post by IFISAcava on Oct 5, 2023 10:59:05 GMT
vindhi - There was not discussion of that although it was noted that the statement was accompanied by a signed statement of truth registerme - yes, I intend to accurately and fairly report what was said. This will be much easier if/when I receive the document concerned The problem being that the statement will be resubmitted with an instruction from the judge to remove the irrelevant and scandalous bit relating to allegations of Mousey's vicious treatment of him, which is further alleged to have been at the behest of Unbolted's directors. Unclear if this invalid statement (without a residential address) will remain on file I suppose. The relevant incident that the Claimant alleges nearly led to his death is on a You Tube video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=leDWgbFJPh8The judge was invited to view this. Why not judge for yourself. Mousey, I hope I am not stealing your thunder (or worse) - tell me and I will delete this if so!
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,665
Likes: 2,989
|
Post by IFISAcava on Oct 5, 2023 11:00:29 GMT
Are details of the "scandalous allegations" allowed to be reported? I can't see why not - it was read out in open court; see my previous post. Allegations of serious assault and near death.
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,665
Likes: 2,989
|
Post by IFISAcava on Oct 5, 2023 11:07:28 GMT
TBH, the title of this thread could have been changed. There’s nothing else for me to cash out from his overdue loans since this Saga brought by the claimant. A trial date? When’s the repayment date? My main question, if there’s a contract in place to sell the pawns when borrower can’t repay, “what” exactly is stopping unbolted to sell? Trial date will be at least a year away - a window of (from memory) Oct 2024-Feb 2025. No prospects of an early settlement it seems. So I would not expect any repayment for 2 years (or more - allowing for enforcement and/or appeals if Unbolted win). Regarding the last q, there is an agreement not to sell while litigation is ongoing. Interest is accruing though as far as I understand (not sure what rate, and not sure if that might also be argued during legal proceedings).
|
|
registerme
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,233
Likes: 6,038
|
Post by registerme on Oct 5, 2023 12:19:30 GMT
ermm, I'm struggling to come up with a more appropriate response than "lol".
|
|
ozboy
Member of DD Central
Mine's a Large One! (Snigger, snigger .......)
Posts: 3,161
Likes: 4,844
|
Post by ozboy on Oct 5, 2023 13:21:28 GMT
@mousey Was there any mention of contempt of court proceedings given that M**** blatantly lied in his most recent witness statement? I have no idea about "Law", but that is a good question I would think. Surely if a signed statement on a very serious matter is subsequently proven to be blatant and false then the whole case gets thrown out? How do you believe anything else presented as "fact"? Or, as you say, contempt of court or something thrown at them at least? Am I the only one that thinks "justice" in this country is a farce, and lurches all over the place.
|
|
|
Post by overthehill on Oct 5, 2023 14:03:53 GMT
Hardly surprising the whole justice system is jammed up. How many claimants like this would it take to cause paralysis given the courts seem to be impotent to deal with it efficiently.
|
|