mikeb
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 472
|
Post by mikeb on Nov 25, 2014 19:11:41 GMT
To be fair, it took them a very VERY long time to come up with that explanation, after losing puzzled/disgruntled customers to Ratesetter along the way. I suspect that a lot of that time was Zopa trying to work out how it ACTUALLY worked versus what they thought it did. We still have not entered the period where people start posting "Hey, if the explanation says (x) why is my money doing (y)", so give it a little while
|
|
|
Post by batchoy on Nov 25, 2014 19:25:55 GMT
I had interest paid from Aberdeen WT today with no deductions for the provision fund. sand2880: Was your investment in the Aberdeen WT made directly? Or via the GEIA. If it was made directly there should be no deduction for the PF because it has no PF coverage. EDIT: My apologies, I hadn't seen that a few minutes ago you had clarified your earlier message. And I hadn't realised that the time gap between the interest being posted and the PF deduction being made was a full six hours -- yesterday it was less than one hour. It looks like they have a process that runs periodically to take back the PF premium, which potentially makes it worse from a Tax point of view and also makes it potentially very difficult to track and match interest payments and PF premiums. Out of interest (since I haven't invested and don't intend to) can you, as the proposal states, set the GEIA to withdraw interest and repayments like the MLIA, if so has anyone tried it and what is the effect on the PF premiums particularly if they are being taken hours after the interest payments come in?
|
|
|
Post by Ton ⓉⓞⓃ on Nov 25, 2014 19:27:01 GMT
To be fair, it took them a very VERY long time to come up with that explanation, after losing puzzled/disgruntled customers to Ratesetter along the way. I suspect that a lot of that time was Zopa trying to work out how it ACTUALLY worked versus what they thought it did. We still have not entered the period where people start posting "Hey, if the explanation says (x) why is my money doing (y)", so give it a little while And by and large Lenders had worked most of it out for themselves (@zopamat helped a little... )
|
|
bugs4me
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1,478
|
Post by bugs4me on Nov 25, 2014 20:26:15 GMT
To be fair, it took them a very VERY long time to come up with that explanation, after losing puzzled/disgruntled customers to Ratesetter along the way. I suspect that a lot of that time was Zopa trying to work out how it ACTUALLY worked versus what they thought it did. We still have not entered the period where people start posting "Hey, if the explanation says (x) why is my money doing (y)", so give it a little while Yes they did loose many a lender/investor and I went into run-off mode with them towards the latter part of 13. Still at that stage. Once I cease to understand how a platform works, or maybe, when the platform refuses (for whatever reason) to explain how it works, then I'm out. In the case of Z, it will take a while for my investments to totally run-off but I have no intention of jumping back in. It's of little use to myself that's it's all controlled by an algorithm that no one can fathom out. It wasn't just Z that was trying to work things out. So was the community forum and my goodness IMO we went round and round in circles. A total waste of time. It surprised me that Z did not get more involved in the discussions but coincidentally IIRC it was also at the time that institutional funds arrived although I stand to be corrected on those thoughts. Z is really now for the passive investor. Us active folks are an irritant to them. Now back to topic about this Green Monster (sorry Rose, you've got me calling it that now), I mean GEIA........
|
|
star dust
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,998
Likes: 3,531
|
Post by star dust on Nov 25, 2014 20:33:22 GMT
Out of interest (since I haven't invested and don't intend to) can you, as the proposal states, set the GEIA to withdraw interest and repayments like the MLIA, if so has anyone tried it and what is the effect on the PF premiums particularly if they are being taken hours after the interest payments come in? Yes, you can, and I have. I invested a massive £10, about a week ago to see for myself what would happen. As others observed it couldn't manage to fully invest, or proportion properly. However, two days ago it sold some bits the proceeds then went to my cash account, leaving me with 37 pence still uninvested and less than £10 in the account. So, I removed the 37p myself leaving £ 9.49 fully invested. Yesterday and today, it decided to sell yet more loan parts and transfer these together with some <penny interest amounts to my cash account. I now have a grand total of only £8.18 invested! At this rate my £10 will be back in my cash account soon and the experiment will be over. It seems to me it's still trying to balance my loan book, but the withdrawals are preventing it from doing any more purchases, and the whole thing's just reducing. I have to admit I haven't been that fascinated enough to do much analysis, I'm just watching the 'headline' figures and wondering what a mainstream punter would make of it .
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Nov 25, 2014 21:08:05 GMT
25th Nov 2014 at 15:30 Provision fund payment to Green Energy Investment Account Provision Fund £-0.02 25th Nov 2014 at 09:29 Interest payment for loan Aberdeenshire Wind Turbine (93) £0.12 But hovering over the provision fund amount, it states 3.56p and the difference between 12 & 3.56 would bring the return to 7%, so Im guessing that 2p was deducted taking into account prior rounded payments. Inasmuch as the GEIA only became available ten days ago, I don't see how any payments being made today could be taking account of prior rounded payments -- because there wouldn't have been any prior payments, rounded or otherwise. And if 3.56p was rounded to 2p, then AC are using a very different definition of rounding than I've ever come across before. chris: Is this the way you were expecting the system to behave? As for the new green cr*p I'm not in the least interested and am a bit surprised that so many of you seem to be (or is it just curiosity?) I looked at the GEIA and concluded that the cost -- being the spread between 9.5-10% and 7% -- is much greater than coverage by the PF is worth to me, so I will not be putting any significant sums in it. But I have to admit that I'm somewhat obsessed by understanding how things work, and particularly so when my investments are involved. Because of that, I've made a small investment in the GEIA so I could see first-hand how it works. The answer to jonno's question, therefore, is that in my case it's just curiosity. Out of interest (since I haven't invested and don't intend to) can you, as the proposal states, set the GEIA to withdraw interest and repayments like the MLIA, if so has anyone tried it and what is the effect on the PF premiums particularly if they are being taken hours after the interest payments come in? I can confirm that the option does seem to exist for the GEIA exactly as it does for the MLIA. I haven't tried setting it to withdraw. Even if I had, I'm afraid it wouldn't be much of a test because my account is so small I'd expect the repayments to round to 0p for some time to come -- especially if the rounding is handled as others have observed. However, using an example of a £120 holding in a WT loan paying 9.5%, what I'd expect to happen if interest was set to be withdrawn is... - Every month a payment of 95p would be received.
- With the withdrawal option set, that 95p would be credited to the lender's Cash Account.
- If the system is smart enough to try to take the 25p destined for the PF out of the Cash account as well, then there shouldn't be a problem. Unless, of course, the lender was very quick -- or the system was very slow, as observed today -- and withdrew all their available funds before the PF debit was attempted.
- If the system isn't that smart and tries to take the 25p out of the GEIA, then it would get interesting. Either the withdrawal would be refused -- as currently happens if a lender tries to withdraw more from their MLIA than they have available cash -- or the system will do what it originally was set up to do in the MLIA until people complained, which is to sell some GEIA holding to raise the required 25p. Unless the GEIA just happens to contain some parts of loans not currently available on the Aftermarket -- those probably would sell reasonably quickly -- it could take some time before any loan parts actually sold. And how would the parts to be sold be selected?
And for anyone who hasn't been following my saga closely... this sale means that I now have 33p of my experimental GEIA uninvested. Today, the GEIA bought 5p of Bu WT for me. So now I have 28p uninvested. I haven't a clue why only 5p was bought. I can't wait to see what happens next!
|
|
|
Post by batchoy on Nov 25, 2014 21:37:45 GMT
Out of interest (since I haven't invested and don't intend to) can you, as the proposal states, set the GEIA to withdraw interest and repayments like the MLIA, if so has anyone tried it and what is the effect on the PF premiums particularly if they are being taken hours after the interest payments come in? I can confirm that the option does seem to exist for the GEIA exactly as it does for the MLIA. I haven't tried setting it to withdraw. Even if I had, I'm afraid it wouldn't be much of a test because my account is so small I'd expect the repayments to round to 0p for some time to come -- especially if the rounding is handled as others have observed. However, using an example of a £120 holding in a WT loan paying 9.5%, what I'd expect to happen if interest was set to be withdrawn is... - Every month a payment of 95p would be received.
- With the withdrawal option set, that 95p would be credited to the lender's Cash Account.
- If the system is smart enough to try to take the 25p destined for the PF out of the Cash account as well, then there shouldn't be a problem. Unless, of course, the lender was very quick -- or the system was very slow, as observed today -- and withdrew all their available funds before the PF debit was attempted.
- If the system isn't that smart and tries to take the 25p out of the GEIA, then it would get interesting. Either the withdrawal would be refused -- as currently happens if a lender tries to withdraw more from their MLIA than they have available cash -- or the system will do what it originally was set up to do in the MLIA until people complained, which is to sell some GEIA holding to raise the required 25p. Unless the GEIA just happens to contain some parts of loans not currently available on the Aftermarket -- those probably would sell reasonably quickly -- it could take some time before any loan parts actually sold. And how would the parts to be sold be selected?
I came to similar conclusions and the only one that makes sense is that the GEIA will attempt to sell investments sufficient to pay the PF premium as it is the only way that it could near enough guarantee to have funds, but then again the platform is so messed up in the way it reports transactions when the MLIA is set to withdraw mode it could potentially do anything. What I don't understand is why the GEIA has been implemented in the way it has, other than programming expediency, because the implementation does not match the proposal and there are all manner of negative consequences from the way it has been done.
|
|
ramblin rose
Member of DD Central
“Some people grumble that roses have thorns; I am grateful that thorns have roses.” — Alphonse Karr
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 857
|
Post by ramblin rose on Nov 25, 2014 22:15:54 GMT
Now back to topic about this Green Monster (sorry Rose, you've got me calling it that now), I mean GEIA........ Apologies not needed; I like to coin a phrase
|
|
niceguy37
Member of DD Central
Posts: 504
Likes: 254
|
Post by niceguy37 on Nov 25, 2014 22:27:43 GMT
What I don't understand is why the GEIA has been implemented in the way it has, other than programming expediency, because the implementation does not match the proposal and there are all manner of negative consequences from the way it has been done. I'd guess the programmer(s) didn't want to mess with the interest calculating module, so they've added this provision fund job to come along afterwards, in the interests of "expediency" as you've put it. Except it's not expedient if it doesn't work.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Nov 26, 2014 0:04:12 GMT
And for anyone who hasn't been following my saga closely... this sale means that I now have 33p of my experimental GEIA uninvested. Today, the GEIA bought 5p of Bu WT for me. So now I have 28p uninvested. I haven't a clue why only 5p was bought. I can't wait to see what happens next! chris: I'm baffled. This evening I noticed that a small amount of Corn**** WT became available on the Aftermarket. My GEIA seems to contain 54p of that loan, so that's 2.7% of my £20 account. I would have expected that the algorithm would recognise that I'm severely underweighted in that WT loan and use my available 28p to try to balance my investment. Instead, it has done absolutely nothing! Is that the way you would expect it to work? Is the algorithm set to leave a certain amount of cash in the account idle?
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 1,546
Member is Online
|
Post by pikestaff on Nov 26, 2014 6:58:13 GMT
It looks like they have a process that runs periodically to take back the PF premium, which potentially makes it worse from a Tax point of view ... I agree. The GEIA could be of interest to higher rate taxpayers if it's structured correctly - ie, if the borrower's interest income is the net figure. Having gross entries pass though the books, at different times, makes this open to question. HMRC could argue that the income is the gross figure and the contribution to the provision fund is (for individuals) a non-deductible expense.
|
|
|
Post by batchoy on Nov 26, 2014 7:00:34 GMT
Today, the GEIA bought 5p of Bu WT for me. So now I have 28p uninvested. I haven't a clue why only 5p was bought. I can't wait to see what happens next! chris: I'm baffled. This evening I noticed that a small amount of Corn**** WT became available on the Aftermarket. My GEIA seems to contain 54p of that loan, so that's 2.7% of my £20 account. I would have expected that the algorithm would recognise that I'm severely underweighted in that WT loan and use my available 28p to try to balance my investment. Instead, it has done absolutely nothing! Is that the way you would expect it to work? Is the algorithm set to leave a certain amount of cash in the account idle? You have probably hit the nail on the head with your last statement, given that the PF Premium collection routine appears to run several hours after interest and capital payments are received, the investment algorithm is probably set to leave a cash reserve in order to ensure that there is cash available to settle the fee when it is collected.
|
|
bugs4me
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1,478
|
Post by bugs4me on Nov 26, 2014 10:05:29 GMT
It looks like they have a process that runs periodically to take back the PF premium, which potentially makes it worse from a Tax point of view ... I agree. The GEIA could be of interest to higher rate taxpayers if it's structured correctly - ie, if the borrower's interest income is the net figure. Having gross entries pass though the books, at different times, makes this open to question. HMRC could argue that the income is the gross figure and the contribution to the provision fund is (for individuals) a non-deductible expense. This should be easy for AC to clarify if/when they participate in this discussion. Whatever they place on the interest earned statement is what will need to be declared. It's not rocket science so surely they could simply confirm whether it's going to be based on the 9.5% or whatever or the 7%. The silence from AC is becoming deafening. Even if they are taking advice, simply post a message to that effect but ATM everyone is in the dark.
|
|
|
Post by mrclondon on Nov 26, 2014 13:33:17 GMT
As I was drifting off to sleep last night I was pondering how the external PR agency which AC has retained for this launch might present the story boards for a tv ad ... how about something like this ? The action takes place against the back drop of a wind farm, and includes a cast of cute little animated piggy banks and large animated green monsters that bear a passing resemblance to computers. The large green monsters are seen throwing the piggy banks at the turbine blades. To the sound of piggy type squeals the piggy banks smash open cascading a shrapnel of coins to the ground. The big green monsters then shovel the coins into 3 wheelbarrows, each of which has a curious set of initials on the side followed by a percentage - CAP, INT, and PF. The green monsters know that the coins should be split between the wheelbarrows according to the percentages but nobody's told them how, they are seen pointing at the percentages scratching their heads, then grunt and shrug their shoulders. And what's this ? A grotesque purple monster with multiple limbs has arrived and grabbed a generous bucketful of coins out of the PF wheelbarrow and is seen wandering off looking smug. Given this ad is bound to be a success, there will be no need for a customer focus group before screening, and a prequel ad can be commissioned immediately for screening a couple of weeks later. I read recently the wonga "Wongies" puppets have been made redundant. They could be hired on the cheap and shown handing their redundancy money to the green monsters who make a dumb show of posting them at random into 5 piggy banks each marked with 20% on the side, but are left with a pile of coins they don't know what to do with. Then cut to an edited highlights version of the first ad, ending with the smug purple monster.
|
|
|
Post by batchoy on Nov 26, 2014 15:27:51 GMT
As I was drifting off to sleep last night I was pondering how the external PR agency which AC has retained for this launch might present the story boards for a tv ad ... how about something like this ? The action takes place against the back drop of a wind farm, and includes a cast of cute little animated piggy banks and large animated green monsters that bear a passing resemblance to computers. The large green monsters are seen throwing the piggy banks at the turbine blades. To the sound of piggy type squeals the piggy banks smash open cascading a shrapnel of coins to the ground. The big green monsters then shovel the coins into 3 wheelbarrows, each of which has a curious set of initials on the side followed by a percentage - CAP, INT, and PF. The green monsters know that the coins should be split between the wheelbarrows according to the percentages but nobody's told them how, they are seen pointing at the percentages scratching their heads, then grunt and shrug their shoulders. And what's this ? A grotesque purple monster with multiple limbs has arrived and grabbed a generous bucketful of coins out of the PF wheelbarrow and is seen wandering off looking smug. Given this ad is bound to be a success, there will be no need for a customer focus group before screening, and a prequel ad can be commissioned immediately for screening a couple of weeks later. I read recently the wonga "Wongies" puppets have been made redundant. They could be hired on the cheap and shown handing their redundancy money to the green monsters who make a dumb show of posting them at random into 5 piggy banks each marked with 20% on the side, but are left with a pile of coins they don't know what to do with. Then cut to an edited highlights version of the first ad, ending with the smug purple monster. You've missed the bit where the big green monster (with the slightly purple tinge) fills the PF wheelbarrow from the one marked INT, after it has been counted by the moustachioed man with the bowler hat and striped trousers but but before he has taken some to fill his brief case.
|
|