|
Post by brightspark on Jun 23, 2020 9:44:31 GMT
I am in a similar boat. There seems to be a common thread running through several postings that each has around £400 unaccounted for and the hope rather than expectation that this is lodged in the cash client account. Perhaps BDO is not able to assess the cash positions of investors because of incomplete records?
|
|
7d7
Member of DD Central
Posts: 134
Likes: 205
|
Post by 7d7 on Jun 26, 2020 12:26:16 GMT
Does anyone recognise the following loan numbers?
335, 302, 360, 363, 493, 367, 368, 430, 431, 481, 268, 306, 504, 503, 617, 738, 586, 284
Were they repaid or renewed with new numbers?
Cheers!
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 10,850
Likes: 11,078
|
Post by ilmoro on Jun 26, 2020 16:36:15 GMT
Does anyone recognise the following loan numbers? 335, 302, 360, 363, 493, 367, 368, 430, 431, 481, 268, 302, 306, 504, 503, 617, 738, 586, 284 Were they repaid or renewed with new numbers? Cheers! Try this thread, starting from here p2pindependentforum.com/post/195343/threadEdit. Missed 302, it was a renewal
|
|
7d7
Member of DD Central
Posts: 134
Likes: 205
|
Post by 7d7 on Jun 27, 2020 5:01:45 GMT
All renewals, it seems. Any ideas on what the new loan numbers are? Cheers!
|
|
hantsowl
Member of DD Central
Posts: 672
Likes: 546
|
Post by hantsowl on Jun 27, 2020 15:16:31 GMT
All renewals, it seems. Any ideas on what the new loan numbers are? Cheers! 335/690, 302/688, 360/695, 363/698, 493/640, 367/704, 368/705, 430/740, 431/741, 481/629, 268/657, 306/ , 504/659, 503/658, 586/740, 284/678 The following are still current... 617 - 4 Pairs of Ladies Diamond Earrings 738- 3.38 Carat Round Brilliant Cut Diamond Ring I can find no reference to 306. Hope this helps.
|
|
|
Post by dan1 on Jun 27, 2020 17:04:54 GMT
All renewals, it seems. Any ideas on what the new loan numbers are? Cheers! 335/690, 302/688, 360/695, 363/698, 493/640, 367/704, 368/705, 430/740, 431/741, 481/629, 268/657, 306/ , 504/659, 503/658, 586/740, 284/678 The following are still current... 617 - 4 Pairs of Ladies Diamond Earrings 738- 3.38 Carat Round Brilliant Cut Diamond Ring I can find no reference to 306. Hope this helps. 305 & 306 were redeemed on 2 Mar 17 (see here) 305 - 2 Rolex Watches a Date-Just and a Diamond Encrusted Day-Date 306 - 2003 Porsche Cayenne S Tiptronic 4 5 with Gemballa Kit That ended the Borrower ID ACC00033 relationship with COL. That's not to say ended the borrower relationship 7d7
|
|
7d7
Member of DD Central
Posts: 134
Likes: 205
|
Post by 7d7 on Jun 27, 2020 18:31:22 GMT
hantsowl430/740 586/740 The same loan or a typo? Cheers!
|
|
hantsowl
Member of DD Central
Posts: 672
Likes: 546
|
Post by hantsowl on Jun 27, 2020 18:47:29 GMT
hantsowl 430/740 586/740 The same loan or a typo? Cheers! Same loan through renewals... 198->430->586->740
|
|
jcb208
Member of DD Central
Posts: 820
Likes: 606
|
Post by jcb208 on Jun 28, 2020 10:20:39 GMT
My balance seems to be about £400 short as well,but can not remember my cash balance ,which was not a great amount.I dont care anymore I just want to get back what I can now,I have already worked an extra year to try to make up for some of my expected losses
|
|
tony
Posts: 136
Likes: 91
|
Post by tony on Jul 3, 2020 18:29:31 GMT
I have not heard anything from them since last December. My emails to them are ignored and when I phoned them I was asked for a case reference number or the name of an individual. I have no idea of the case number but before phoning again I would be interested to know the name of the person that others managed to speak to or if they know the case number. I am beginning to think that they have not found the record of my loans because most investors seem to have received the promised email last month.
|
|
tony
Posts: 136
Likes: 91
|
Post by tony on Jul 8, 2020 20:46:56 GMT
As I have never received a reply to emails I sent to BDO I resorted to phoning them to find out why I had not been sent details of my loan book. Apparently Collateral had not updated my email address which I sent them shortly before they went bust.
I have found a discrepancy of £175 when comparing their records with my own. Two loans in my records do not appear in theirs and they list one loan which is not shown on my record. The amount lent is the same as one of my missing loans so perhaps the loan reference has been changed. Can any clued up forum member tell me:
1. Was loan BL00045, the one missing on the BDO list sent to me, repaid or re-numbered. 2. Was BL00554 re-numbered BB00707.
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 10,850
Likes: 11,078
|
Post by ilmoro on Jul 8, 2020 21:15:33 GMT
As I have never received a reply to emails I sent to BDO I resorted to phoning them to find out why I had not been sent details of my loan book. Apparently Collateral had not updated my email address which I sent them shortly before they went bust. I have found a discrepancy of £175 when comparing their records with my own. Two loans in my records do not appear in theirs and they list one loan which is not shown on my record. The amount lent is the same as one of my missing loans so perhaps the loan reference has been changed. Can any clued up forum member tell me: 1. Was loan BL00045, the one missing on the BDO list sent to me, repaid or re-numbered. 2. Was BL00554 re-numbered BB00707. 1. Repaid 11/1/18 according to posts from Collateral on here 2. Probably, BB00554 renewed on the same date as above (Same issue with my records but amount is the same)
|
|
GeorgeT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,321
Likes: 1,575
|
Post by GeorgeT on Jul 9, 2020 1:07:27 GMT
In the report today, BDO mention having received many emails from investors about their loan breakdown spreadsheets. They say most people said theirs were correct but a few said there were discrepancies.
The BDO email last month said investors should email in if they had comments. Therefore I didn't reply at all as mine looked spot on.
Was I right to not confirm my statement was right or should I email them so they can mark me off as correct?
I was thinking it best to not trouble them and raise their time charged but it sounds as though most investors did.
Any thoughts. I assumed they would treat a nil response as tacit agreement to their figures.
|
|
duck
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,577
Likes: 5,693
|
Post by duck on Jul 9, 2020 3:37:17 GMT
...... Was I right to not confirm my statement was right or should I email them so they can mark me off as correct? I was thinking it best to not trouble them and raise their time charged but it sounds as though most investors did. Any thoughts. I assumed they would treat a nil response as tacit agreement to their figures. I'm not going to say 'all good here', I think in cash terms. Say 10 minutes billable to read an Email, open database and update. 10 minutes at £600+VAT = £120. If investors have been sending in such Emails all they are achieving is a lower final return.
|
|
chris1200
Member of DD Central
Posts: 827
Likes: 508
|
Post by chris1200 on Jul 9, 2020 8:44:20 GMT
...... Was I right to not confirm my statement was right or should I email them so they can mark me off as correct? I was thinking it best to not trouble them and raise their time charged but it sounds as though most investors did. Any thoughts. I assumed they would treat a nil response as tacit agreement to their figures. I'm not going to say 'all good here', I think in cash terms. Say 10 minutes billable to read an Email, open database and update. 10 minutes at £600+VAT = £120. If investors have been sending in such Emails all they are achieving is a lower final return. With respect, a Partner is not going to be reading such emails. It also doesn't take 10 minutes to read an email and any database updating to mark as 'okay' would need to be done regardless of the email. The wording in the email was ambiguous, but I took it to mean: do let us know if it's accurate or not. So I did so, in a very short email. Given they've now said that confirming these amounts is basically the final stage before interim distributions, I'd be even more inclined to do this.
|
|