|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Dec 5, 2014 10:37:36 GMT
Just in case folks here are not aware of it, there were actually some answers from FC's VP of technology (I know, I know .. don't laugh, he did at least stick his head above the parapet, which is pretty brave this week of all weeks) over on the other place at the well concealed (i.e. often not visible on their front page .. their forum really sux) location .. forum.fundingcircle.com/forum/talk-to-fellow-members/all-about-lending/9569-questions-you-d-like-to-ask-us(The actual reply is near the bottom of the thread). Apparently it's all going to be much better in January, but don't hold your breath for the API. 8>.
|
|
chrisf
Member of DD Central
Posts: 224
Likes: 67
|
Post by chrisf on Dec 5, 2014 11:46:55 GMT
I was quite interested in your Q8 (reproduced below with answer from David T)
------------------
Q8) Are you ever going to throttle bot bidding speed (apart from the accidental side effect of trapped bids)? You have the technology .. I assume.
A8) We do have the tech to limit but at the moment it would be a rather ‘clumsy’ process. Automatically banning accounts by techniques such as IP blacklisting can cause problems for legitimate users. We have recently banned a number of repeat offenders and will be looking a further methods to reduce misuse.
-------------------
So it would seem that some bid bot accounts have already been banned. What I'd like to know is: What did these bid-bots do to get banned which all the other bid-bots haven't done. Was it bidding too much (has the tall one been spotted this week?) or bidding too many times, or what? What constitutes misuse exactly?
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Dec 5, 2014 12:14:30 GMT
------------------- So it would seem that some bid bot accounts have already been banned. What I'd like to know is: What did these bid-bots do to get banned which all the other bid-bots haven't done. Was it bidding too much (has the tall one been spotted this week?) or bidding too many times, or what? What constitutes misuse exactly? GSV, this would explain your need to change IP. Why would they ban you? Perhaps we should organise a bidding strike in support.
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Dec 5, 2014 15:46:29 GMT
If I ever find out I will be sure and let you know, however the only thing I can image I was doing yesterday, different from the last 12 months, was trying (in vain) to access loan request data when the site was down. Certainly not bidding too much or fast, I have reduced that since my initial efforts (back in about Jan 2014) (speed by ~10x and number of bids by 3-4x) to try to 'play nicely'. Perhaps talking to a dead site is regarded as naughty? .. they have yet to tell me (I'm certainly not a repeat offender, as far as I know .. not even had a yellow card or a caution, despite asking them a couple of times in case I was upsetting their system(s)).
|
|
|
Post by yorkshireman on Dec 6, 2014 20:04:40 GMT
Ahem.
I actually named the tall one whilst berating the FC lady about bid bots earlier this week when she was trying to bullsh*t me about how FC take feedback seriously.
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Dec 6, 2014 21:01:00 GMT
I'm not sure the tall one uses a bidbot anyway, he/she just throws in £960 bids as fast as he/she an push the button .. not like it's a whole bunch of bids, only normally a dozen or so (which is already quite a lot of loot*) and they are usually a) early (to fill the loan up and lock autobid out) or b) last minute (or last 30 seconds!) (to secure parts), Between times, no activity much as far as I can tell.
b*z(****) is much more active all through the auction, and is almost surely a bot or bots **. There are several others (me included, although I'm limiting number of bids (10-12), % of auction (<10%), bid rate (2-3 seconds per), and various other parameters, all of which could easily be exceeded (and are, by most of the bots out there)). If the site can't cope with 10 bids in a minute, they need a new site. Well, OK, we know they do ..
I did get a response from FC confirming they had blocked the IP address I was using at the time, apologising for me/the customer support reps not having been informed before, during, or after, but failing (so far) to give details of why ('we are taking no further action on this occasion' they say, which sort of implies no just cause was identified) .. I suspect there may BE no very good reason, except their site was broken so they shot-gunned everything which "might be a cause". I shall continue to enquire, since I have no desire to cause any problem, but it's kind of hard to achieve that if they can't tell me what the problem was / might be. Could just be that I failed to stop trying fast enough when the site was down, which is possible to remedy (tick, done).
One wonders whether b*z(****) et al got caught in the same shotgun blast. 8>.
* - of course just one £960 bid can kick out 48 bids of £20, which means 48 transaction reports to be snopaked out, which results in a lot of system activity (and trapped bids) one suspect.
** or teams of button pushers based in India, etc?
|
|
|
Post by pepperpot on Dec 6, 2014 21:50:12 GMT
Yes, B*z world definitely operates bots, I remember manually bidding at the same time once, the bid button was very responsive but the list showed 4 of theirs in between each of mine.
If you got shot and they didn't it was either just unlucky or... Keep trying, I'd love to know. (maybe they are too big for Fairy Cakes to want to annoy?)
PS I don't think they are the same person, the B*z's that is, as I've seen one out bid the other. Similarly for J*B***ton being Knocked out by B*z(****). Not conclusive, but their bots need to talk to each other if they are.
|
|
wysiati
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 86
|
Post by wysiati on Dec 6, 2014 22:31:13 GMT
I'm not sure the tall one uses a bidbot anyway, he/she just throws in £960 bids as fast as he/she an push the button .. not like it's a whole bunch of bids, only normally a dozen or so (which is already quite a lot of loot) and they are usually a) early (to fill the loan up and lock autobid out) or b) last minute (or last 30 seconds!) (to secure parts), Between times, no activity much as far as I can tell. b*z(****) is much more active all through the auction, and is almost surely a bot or bots **. There are several others (me included, although I'm limiting number of bids (10-12), % of auction (<10%), bid rate (2-3 seconds per), and various other parameters, all of which could easily be exceeded (and are, by most of the bots out there)). If the site can't cope with 10 bids in a minute, they need a new site. Well, OK, we know they do .. I did get a response from FC confirming they had blocked the IP address I was using at the time, apologising for me/the customer support reps not having been informed before, during, or after, but failing (so far) to give details of why ('we are taking no further action on this occasion' they say, which sort of implies no just cause was identified) .. I suspect there may BE no very good reason, except their site was broken so they shot-gunned everything which "might be a cause". I shall continue to enquire, since I have no desire to cause any problem, but it's kind of hard to achieve that if they can't tell me what the problem was / might be. Could just be that I failed to stop trying fast enough when the site was down, which is possible to remedy (tick, done). One wonders whether b*z(****) et al got caught in the same shotgun blast. 8>. ** or teams of button pushers based in India, etc? FWIW, I am not so convinced that some of the larger participants mentioned use bid bots. Heterogeneity of bidding patterns would be another factor; taking your/pepperpot's examples T******i and B******a can appear inconsistent in terms of bid levels and amounts and there is not consistent rebidding of knocked out allocations from what I have seen. Even J*B*****n (previously (B*z)) with a more rules based approach does not necessarily automatically 'rebid' if knocked out. This suggests more direct real-time discretion (and/or lack of automation) is being exercised than with your typical autobot. The last two bidders mentioned rarely seem to participate at the end of auctions presumably as rates are too low and the larger loan requests are more likely to be crowded (seller) trades.
|
|
|
Post by yorkshireman on Dec 7, 2014 11:28:20 GMT
I fail to see how anyone can fire bids in manually at the rate TS does and he certainly participates at the end of auctions. I can’t quote the auction but within the last month he fired in something like 30 x £960 bids in the last 30 seconds or less, I defy anyone to do that manually!
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Dec 7, 2014 11:47:10 GMT
Hmm, I suppose it is possible that rather than a real AI-type bot, they just use a rapid-fire autobidder, where they manually point it at an auction with a number of bids (and bid value, but that's always £960 in this case) and off it goes at the maximum sustainable rate (which I have previously measured at 2-4 bids per second - any faster and (some) bids get lost - but that is still 10-20 times faster than 'wait for the bid button to light up' bidding rates of 2-3 seconds per bid). That's a lot easier to produce than a general AI type bot, especially since we know he/she/it ignores all rules on '10% of any one auction' etc.
You can do even 'better' / faster - just run multiple bidder instances on multiple PCs &/or multiple IP addresses, or even go for multiple user names (take a bow, Mr B*?) .. the only real limit is FC's server on the other end, although at some point the rapid bidding starts to look like a deliberate Denial of Service attack.
So is it/"X" a bot/autobidder? Well, if it hits bid rates of more than 20 bids in any one minute, I'd say it probably is (and an ill mannered one, which is ignoring the bid button response cycle) .. fewer than that and 'it might be'. If it's responding to knocked out bids at 3:23 Am, it probably is as well, whatever its bid rate. I guess your line speed has some impact on this - gigabit broadband, and you'd suffer a lot less from the ridiculous amount of data FC sends out whenever you push a button - but again the FC server end is going be be the ultimate limit.
If the tall one is in London, or at some major university/hub, he/she will certainly have the possibility of broadband speeds that makes we rural dwellers look a bit Victorian, so don't judge what's possible by how fast your/my particular bit of damp string can run.
|
|
|
Post by pepperpot on Dec 7, 2014 12:45:32 GMT
Yes, I guess that could be it. Any IP that looks like a DoS attack when the servers are busy will find themselves looking down the twin barrels when Financial Consultancy are trying to get service back up and running.
Would there be any way of auto switching off or toning down 'biddy' if the response times increase to beyond a certain level, as when the site is unstressed I can't see a problem with using a bot to save your index finger becoming arthritic, but it could be seen as selfish/unhelpful when it adds to tying everything up in knots just when the servers are needed the most i.e. days when busy auctions are ending.
I must be on a slightly drier bit of string as my manual bidding can be less than a second, I don't wait for my own reaction time to add to the bid button coming back time, and just sit there rattling the left mouses ear. I can get up to 7 or 8 (more commonly 5 or 6) 'New Bid!' confirmation boxes swiping onto the screen before the first has disappeared.
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Dec 7, 2014 14:10:44 GMT
Yes I agree that if you keep under about three digital (finger) bids per second it will work in a quiet time on a good day. Go faster and it all gums up. End of auction is another thing altogether.
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Dec 7, 2014 14:19:10 GMT
I'm not sure why I would look like a DoS attack at any time, since when the service was down I was asking for a page about twice a minute at most (none of which were bid attempts, not having any data on which to base bids). I await Fanciful Cuckoo's response. Yes, I can tone it down some more I suppose, and wait for the actual 504 errors, rather than timing out and trying again after X seconds.
'Biddy' rarely participates at the end of busy auctions, the rates are usually too low to be interesting (a few exceptions, but none of them when the site collapsed the other day), and even then the bidding rate is throttled to whatever the bid button will stand (seemingly 2 or 3 times slower than your own index finger). The main reason for using a bot at all is that it saves me sitting at the PC / tablet all day trying to keep a bid in.... dynamic autobid on the server, general release of the API, or more widely spaced bid rate options, would do just as well AFAIAC (but large scale flippers would likely flee before either). It's technically interesting too.
Manually, I've never managed to get more than 2 'bid accepted' boxes up at once .. maybe I need a few more cores in the CPU, &/or a move to 'civilization' (yuk!) where I could get faster internet .. programmatically, as I mentioned, it is possible (if unfriendly) to get a bid reliably accepted every 400ms, even from here (one bot, one account) .. it would certainly scale with more accounts, not sure how well it would scale with multiple concurrent bots .. no intention of trying it, since I've already scaled it back to ~10 bids (from previous max of 50) and 'whatever rate the site response with 'bid accepted' (typically 2000 ms, vs the possible 400 ms). Actually if you don't care if some bids get lost you can toss them in at 10 a second or more, with the danger you have no idea how many are actually accepted at any time.
|
|
|
Post by goldservice on Dec 7, 2014 14:25:40 GMT
The ghost at this feast is that we are talking about chasing the rate and this is fun. Where else can you have such excitement and get your stake back if you lose? FOBTs can go spin their wheels! There are still the last minute blackouts, of course, but I suspect that most of us have found ways of living with them. Then, as the dust settles after a hectic auction end, we wait for Festive Capers to tell us if we are under invested or overhung. Then, on to the next one ...
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Dec 7, 2014 16:24:04 GMT
Having fun while you make money is what it's all about. I have always though that First Class could justify a small charge for each minute logged on to the site. I just can't believe it's still free.
|
|