|
|
Post by overthehill on Apr 11, 2023 8:31:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by overthehill on May 3, 2023 11:12:46 GMT
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,978 
Likes: 5,131
|
Post by adrianc on May 3, 2023 11:21:15 GMT
Well, almost nobody else. Oh, wait. Perhaps they're the same person after all? ...although clearly it does need clarification. Perhaps the name's got confused slightly? Bless 'er. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigitte_GabrielInteresting back story...
|
|
ozboy
Member of DD Central
Mine's a Large One! (Snigger, snigger .......)
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 4,859
|
Post by ozboy on May 3, 2023 11:38:05 GMT
"Perhaps the name's got confused slightly?
Bless 'er."
Aren't they both as bad as each other? ie. Appalling.
Isn't the West blighted by this Lesser Of Two Evils, Rock And Hard Place Choice?
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,978
Likes: 5,131
|
Post by adrianc on May 3, 2023 12:23:06 GMT
"Perhaps the name's got confused slightly?
Bless 'er."Aren't they both as bad as each other? ie. Appalling. Isn't the West blighted by this Lesser Of Two Evils, Rock And Hard Place Choice? Nah, Biden's nowhere near as bad as the orange gibbon. I mean, they're both very similar age - 3.5yrs between 'em - and, on that alone, you do have to wonder if they couldn't really find anybody better... But the UK's hardly in a position to lecture other countries on elevating mediocrities (and worse) to high office.
|
|
|
|
Post by overthehill on Jun 1, 2023 15:44:20 GMT
Trump will end up being the biggest criminal and traitor in US history. What next for the US presidency, a russian, chinese or north korean born spy or sleeper?
And just one more about a certain family member dismembering her Trump name to save herself.
|
|
jo
Member of DD Central
dead
Posts: 741
Likes: 498
|
Post by jo on Jun 1, 2023 16:12:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by overthehill on Jun 10, 2023 18:24:46 GMT
2024 US presidential hopeful.
|
|
|
|
Post by overthehill on Jun 11, 2023 9:51:31 GMT
Elon muskrat's latest ploy is to label all publicly available images that he doesn't like or don't comply with his freedom of speech policies as sensitive content.
|
|
|
|
Post by overthehill on Jun 14, 2023 16:43:40 GMT
|
|
michaelc
Member of DD Central
Say No To T.D.S.
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 2,974
|
Post by michaelc on Jun 14, 2023 17:00:19 GMT
Elon muskrat's latest ploy is to label all publicly available images that he doesn't like or don't comply with his freedom of speech policies as sensitive content.
As a member of the rare breed in the UK that would rather Trump in power than Biden and someone who has tremendous respect for Musk's technological achievements even I would absolutely draw the line at this - if true (as in a policy to wrongly attribute these images as "sensitive").
|
|
|
|
Post by overthehill on Jun 14, 2023 19:46:33 GMT
Elon muskrat's latest ploy is to label all publicly available images that he doesn't like or don't comply with his freedom of speech policies as sensitive content.
As a member of the rare breed in the UK that would rather Trump in power than Biden and someone who has tremendous respect for Musk's technological achievements even I would absolutely draw the line at this - if true (as in a policy to wrongly attribute these images as "sensitive").
What this Trump ?
And he won the election with 2M less votes than Hilary Clinton.
|
|
Greenwood2
Member of DD Central
Posts: 4,376
Likes: 2,780
|
Post by Greenwood2 on Jun 14, 2023 20:15:37 GMT
Elon muskrat's latest ploy is to label all publicly available images that he doesn't like or don't comply with his freedom of speech policies as sensitive content.
As a member of the rare breed in the UK that would rather Trump in power than Biden and someone who has tremendous respect for Musk's technological achievements even I would absolutely draw the line at this - if true (as in a policy to wrongly attribute these images as "sensitive"). I think most people in the UK would rather not have Biden or Trump, but on balance I think Trump is more dangerous. Hopefully neither will stand in the end, but I hate to think who will instead.
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,978
Likes: 5,131
|
Post by adrianc on Jun 14, 2023 20:37:34 GMT
As a member of the rare breed in the UK that would rather Trump in power than Biden Would you care to explain your thought process there? Which are minimal. Musk was very lucky being in the right place at the right time. Let's not forget $28k of Daddy's apartheid-era money in 1995 went into founding Zip2.com, which was sold for $307m in 1999 - of which $22m was Elon's. That money went into X.com, which merged with a competitor four months later, before his sacking another ten months from foundation, and the eventual sale for $1.5bn two years after that - of which he received 11%. $175m from 7% of $28k borrowed - in five years. Nice work if you can get it, especially when you remember that for the important portion of that time he wasn't actually employed by the businesses, just owned stock. The rest is what a geek does with $175m in the early 00s. He made some good investments at the right time, turning that huge packet into a ridiculous one, largely through cultivating a cult-of-personality that's outweighed most basic realities, but constantly lives on the verge of coming back to bite him. And it will... soon. "if true" - embedded Twit links here show the actual twit as of the time of viewing, as if you were viewing it directly. Click on the time/date to go directly, if you don't believe it. Can we know the logic behind that attribution? No. Can we guess, bearing in mind what we know about the proprietor and the direction of the platform under his ownership? Yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by martin44 on Jun 19, 2023 18:02:10 GMT
As a member of the rare breed in the UK that would rather Trump in power than Biden Which are minimal. Musk was very lucky being in the right place at the right time. Let's not forget $28k of Daddy's apartheid-era money in 1995 went into founding Zip2.com, which was sold for $307m in 1999 - of which $22m was Elon's. That money went into X.com, which merged with a competitor four months later, before his sacking another ten months from foundation, and the eventual sale for $1.5bn two years after that - of which he received 11%. $175m from 7% of $28k borrowed - in five years. Nice work if you can get it, especially when you remember that for the important portion of that time he wasn't actually employed by the businesses, just owned stock. The rest is what a geek does with $175m in the early 00s. He made some good investments at the right time, turning that huge packet into a ridiculous one, largely through cultivating a cult-of-personality that's outweighed most basic realities, but constantly lives on the verge of coming back to bite him. And it will... soon. "if true" - embedded Twit links here show the actual twit as of the time of viewing, as if you were viewing it directly. Click on the time/date to go directly, if you don't believe it. Can we know the logic behind that attribution? No. Can we guess, bearing in mind what we know about the proprietor and the direction of the platform under his ownership? Yes. Trunp can think for himself...and indeed fight battles for himself... and have policies that benefit the usa... and fight against south coast immigration etc etc.... biden doesnt even know hes an american.
|
|
