A fascinating insight! Thank you for sharing.
You're right, it is worrying as a P2P lender if one is relying on such assets for collateral.
I have learned my lesson from the catastrophe that was Ablrate. For those who don't know much about them, that platform encouraged us to lend to small and medium size businesses.
Almost all my loans - and those of investors I am in contact with - are in default, not having paid either interest or capital for at least the whole of this year and in many cases much longer. While Ablrate are choosing to keep most matters hidden from us, of the loans we have some insight into it is obvious that the collateral is going to be worthless.
These securities from these borrowers consist of shoes, gym equipment, cars etc.
Nevermind selling them to eventually get 5% of what we were told they were worth, Ablrate is spectacularly incapable of getting a single item from a single borrower.
I've lost a lot of money with Ablrate and also investing in other small businesses in the past. It is for this reason I would never lend to a SME ever again who provide collateral in the form of merchandise or Intellectual Property etc.
I focus on lending to borrowers with independently-valued, readily-sellable properties here in the UK at a reasonable LTV.
Even with having land and properties one has to be very careful and conduct considerable due diligence as the valuations are often farcical. Even at LTVs advertised at 70% by P2P platforms one can end up losing money as a lender. The properties sell at far below the value borrowers are told they are worth and then administrators, lawyers etc. eat up a huge amount of the realised funds.
I know about inaccurate valuations from a property I myself sold. The lady valuing it didn't pay much attention to the defects in the building and how run down the vicinity was etc. and she
therefore valued it at significantly higher than I thought it was worth - as born out by the fact that the buyer now can't sell it for anything like the price I sold it to him for.