benaj
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 1,692
|
Trump
Aug 29, 2024 18:42:11 GMT
via mobile
Post by benaj on Aug 29, 2024 18:42:11 GMT
I am not encouraging anyone to spend money on Trump’s products. But just wondering the what if? when crypto regulated and already big in the US
|
|
|
Trump
Aug 29, 2024 23:51:03 GMT
Post by captainconfident on Aug 29, 2024 23:51:03 GMT
Don't get trampled in the rush, but after a year and a half, Trump series two cards which also cost 99$ are now trading at 42.51$. www.coingecko.com/en/nft/trump-digital-trading-cards-series-2But the good news is that President Trump got paid 7 million for the image rights and probably didn't invest in these himself. How many nft cards were "minted" in this series? 47 000. How many will be minted in the current series? 360 000 (see small print). "This issue is different!" Because trading of the cards is suspended until Jan 2025. So buyers will not find out the market value of their heirlooms until after the election. I'm sure they will be thrilled. This is not a recommendation to buy and you should always consult a qualified adult before committing to a purchase.
|
|
michaelc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,422
Likes: 2,893
|
Trump
Sept 1, 2024 15:49:34 GMT
Post by michaelc on Sept 1, 2024 15:49:34 GMT
Good one this as it combines my favourite topic (the BBC) and Trump all in one.
|
|
|
Trump
Sept 1, 2024 18:02:48 GMT
Post by captainconfident on Sept 1, 2024 18:02:48 GMT
|
|
angrysaveruk
Member of DD Central
Back and to the left..
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 719
|
Post by angrysaveruk on Sept 1, 2024 19:05:50 GMT
Although this is targeted at the US electorate its message certainly applies to some of the more "brain washed" members of this forum.
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Sept 1, 2024 21:05:43 GMT
Good one this as it combines my favourite topic (the BBC) and Trump all in one. Well the tweet of course is, not surprisingly, nonsense. It is attempting to create the perception of bias/propaganda by raising a point of "what debates?", which one is probably meant to interpret as an allusion to presidential debates as they have not happened. ("what debates"). If one actually reads the article, one sees it is doing a diagnosis of the political debates she was involved in when running for previous positions. As far back as 2010. Such as California Attorney General, California Senate Seat, and the 2020 election VP debate. When I read it earlier today, I found it an interesting article/analysis. I note the guy who posted the tweet didn't actually link to the article so that people could easily read it. Just screenshot the headline and commented. I wonder why? A question which is always worth asking oneself.
|
|
michaelc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,422
Likes: 2,893
|
Trump
Sept 1, 2024 21:43:41 GMT
Post by michaelc on Sept 1, 2024 21:43:41 GMT
Good one this as it combines my favourite topic (the BBC) and Trump all in one. Well the tweet of course is, not surprisingly, nonsense. It is attempting to create the perception of bias/propaganda by raising a point of "what debates?", which one is probably meant to interpret as an allusion to presidential debates as they have not happened. ("what debates"). Of course if one actually reads the article that has been screenshot, one sees it is doing a diagnosis of the political debates she was involved in when running for previous positions. Such as California Attorney General, California Senate Seat, and the 2020 election VP debate. When I read it earlier today, I found it an interesting article/analysis. I note the guy who posted the tweet didn't actually link to the article so that people could easily read it. Just screenshot the headline and commented. I wonder why? A question which is always worth asking oneself. Cheeky so and so....
|
|
|
Post by captainconfident on Sept 1, 2024 21:56:49 GMT
.... certainly applies to some of the more "brain washed" members of this forum. Everyone politely puts up with this, but you do realise that you are being being quite insulting? I'm not going to dangle my dick in front if you but I am quite qualified to express my opinions. Oh ha! Now I've watched the clip you posted, hilarious. Is that a bot speaking? Why is nothing funny coming from the far right, just death cult doom droning? That vid wouldn't impress a stick insect let alone a sentient being. Incredible. I see the appeal of Trump. To the Christian nationalist right and incels. Otherwise I'm at a loss. Why would this geriatric racist rapist represent your ideal leader?
|
|
angrysaveruk
Member of DD Central
Back and to the left..
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 719
|
Trump
Sept 1, 2024 23:26:43 GMT
Post by angrysaveruk on Sept 1, 2024 23:26:43 GMT
.... certainly applies to some of the more "brain washed" members of this forum. Everyone politely puts up with this, but you do realise that you are being being quite insulting? I'm not going to dangle my dick in front if you but I am quite qualified to express my opinions. Oh ha! Now I've watched the clip you posted, hilarious. Is that a bot speaking? Why is nothing funny coming from the far right, just death cult doom droning? That vid wouldn't impress a stick insect let alone a sentient being. Incredible. I see the appeal of Trump. To the Christian nationalist right and incels. Otherwise I'm at a loss. Why would this geriatric racist rapist represent your ideal leader? I wasnt posting this medical advice for you*, I was posting it for Bracknel and RegisterMe * - some people are beyond treatment in my opinion
|
|
registerme
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 6,316
|
Trump
Sept 2, 2024 1:06:30 GMT
Post by registerme on Sept 2, 2024 1:06:30 GMT
Thanks angrysaveruk, but when I need medical advice I'll talk to my GP.
|
|
benaj
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 1,692
|
Trump
Sept 2, 2024 5:18:45 GMT
via mobile
Post by benaj on Sept 2, 2024 5:18:45 GMT
Well, for those who enjoy the debates or Trump topic so much, let’s talk about this by asking this question (or nonsense or others)
Is truthsocial a media outlet or propaganda machine?
I’m here to hear the opinions, truth from all people of different backgrounds. Of course, I can’t guarantee we might hear “nonsense” as well.
Let’s hear michael first.
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Sept 2, 2024 6:25:29 GMT
Everyone politely puts up with this, but you do realise that you are being being quite insulting? I'm not going to dangle my dick in front if you but I am quite qualified to express my opinions. Oh ha! Now I've watched the clip you posted, hilarious. Is that a bot speaking? Why is nothing funny coming from the far right, just death cult doom droning? That vid wouldn't impress a stick insect let alone a sentient being. Incredible. I see the appeal of Trump. To the Christian nationalist right and incels. Otherwise I'm at a loss. Why would this geriatric racist rapist represent your ideal leader? I wasnt posting this medical advice for you*, I was posting it for Bracknel and RegisterMe * - some people are beyond treatment in my opinion So you posted it for a subset of those who, rather than just shrug their shoulders at your more outlandish pronouncements, instead go to the trouble of countering. Typically by: A) Applying basic sense checks and Occam's Razor B) Asking for credible supporting evidence. I mean ANY credible evidence C) Suggesting and applying critical analysis to the problem or issue, including actually looking for the evidence, whichever argument it might support D) Countering assertions you regularly make about our own fundamental world views. Often pointing out they are invalid assumptions, (and presumably are made in an attempt to get reflected credibility for your own). Quite why myself and registerme are considered to still be on the 'treatable' side of that line, and captainconfident is not, I don't know. However, I prefer to have my feet planted in the real world and use my own reasonably well functioning cognitive and analytical abilities thank you. So on this occasion I'll stick with the red pill and turn down the offer of the blue pill. But thank you anyway.
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Sept 2, 2024 6:28:39 GMT
Well the tweet of course is, not surprisingly, nonsense. It is attempting to create the perception of bias/propaganda by raising a point of "what debates?", which one is probably meant to interpret as an allusion to presidential debates as they have not happened. ("what debates"). Of course if one actually reads the article that has been screenshot, one sees it is doing a diagnosis of the political debates she was involved in when running for previous positions. Such as California Attorney General, California Senate Seat, and the 2020 election VP debate. When I read it earlier today, I found it an interesting article/analysis. I note the guy who posted the tweet didn't actually link to the article so that people could easily read it. Just screenshot the headline and commented. I wonder why? A question which is always worth asking oneself. Cheeky so and so.... FWIW, my judgement was directed at the tweeter, in case that wasn't clear. BTW, the original article is at least worth a read if you haven't done so, out of no more than interest.
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1,525
|
Post by pikestaff on Sept 2, 2024 7:08:07 GMT
[...] some people are beyond treatment in my opinion I can certainly think of one.
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,599
Likes: 5,020
|
Trump
Sept 2, 2024 7:32:14 GMT
Post by adrianc on Sept 2, 2024 7:32:14 GMT
Good one this as it combines my favourite topic (the BBC) and Trump all in one. Go on, *read* the article... Y'never know, it might even answer the question. www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3rd1yzgl0qo.ampAs for Darren Grimes... Mmm.
|
|