observer
Member of DD Central
Posts: 872
Likes: 1,380
|
Post by observer on Sept 17, 2024 13:40:40 GMT
You may have read previous posts (since deleted) regarding The Bank of London Group Holdings Ltd being served with a winding up petition by HMRC (long before it appeared in the papers) Well here I am asking you spare a thought for the shareholders of the company. Take a look at the last three documents filed at Companies House, the "Statement of capital following an allotment of shares" filings find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10511092/filing-historyIn reverse order, shares were allocated as follows 4 Sep 2024 276,250,000 shares at 10p each 22 Jul 2024 65,000,000 shares at 10p each 1 Jul 2024 1,089,178 shares at £6.886 each - those are the folks that I am asking you to spare a thought for. A 98.5% drop in the share price in 3 weeks! From £7.5m to £108,917.80 Ouch.
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 1,545
|
Post by pikestaff on Sept 18, 2024 10:13:53 GMT
I am not familiar with the company, so I looked it up. I can't help regarding a startup with such a grandiloquent title and such big ideas of itself with the deepest suspicion, notwithstanding (and perhaps in part because of) the star-studded board. Nevertheless, I doubt that the position is as bad as you suggest. As reported last week it appears that the tax issue has been sorted out. See eg www.reuters.com/business/finance/bank-london-resolves-tax-payment-glitch-raises-funds-2024-09-09/It is also reported that the company raised £42m in August. How does this tie in with the filings? - According to the filings the amount raised by the company at par value (part of which preceded the fundraising) is only £34.125m.
- Adding in the amount reported in the 1 July filing brings us to £41.625m, which is close to the reported amount, but this is probably a coincidence.
- There is no mention in the Companies House filings of a disapplication of pre-emption rights, which would have been necessary if shares had been issued by the company to external investors. I don't think that they were.
I think the two issues at 10p per share (par value) were made to the existing investors at par value, on a pari passu basis, followed by the existing investors selling a portion of their enlarged holding to the incoming investors for £42m. Assuming nothing else changed, the implied value of the company before and after the share issues at par is as follows: Implied value on 1 July £6.886 x 2,144,501 (total number of shares then in issue) = £14.767m Shares issued at par 341,250,000 Proceeds of share issues at par £34.125m Implied value after shares issued at par: £14.767m + £34.125m = £48.892m (A) Total number of shares then in issue; 2,144,501 + 341,250,000 = 343,394,501 (B) Implied value per share after share issues at par: A/B = £0.142379 E&OE The number of shares sold to the incoming investors could be any number, but it would not surprise me if it was 341,250,000 (equal to the number issued at par) in which case the amount paid per share will have been £42m / 341.25m = £0.123077 per share, which is about 86% of the "no change" valuation. Edits: If I am right, then the announcement that the company raised £42m is not exactly true. But then, I note from Wikipedia that the company claimed to be worth $1,1bn at launch . This seems like the purest BS to me!
|
|
observer
Member of DD Central
Posts: 872
Likes: 1,380
|
Post by observer on Sept 18, 2024 13:10:06 GMT
It is an interesting analysis. I don't know if it is accurate, but it could very well be.
There could, of course, be further SH01 filings to come. The company has filed SH01's later than the "within 1 month" deadline previously, and there is still plenty time to report allocations that took place in August anyway.
The line from the bank's own statement says it is "pleased to announce that it raised £42 million during August"
The funding round was led by Mangrove Capital Partners which was a holder before the raise and is headed up by Tluszcz, who is also Board member of the bank's holding company.
Could it, therefore, be that Mangrove bought the shares (there no change to the pre-emption being needed) and investors have bought units in a Mangrove fund that holds the shares as part of its portfolio?
The HMRC winding up petition was indeed withdrawn, though one has to wonder how a fully authorised and regulated bank ending up on the receiving end of that in the first place.
Based on the FT's reporting that the PRA met with the bank on Sunday 8th Sep and that the capital raise was announced on that same Sunday, I think it is fair to say that whatever the situation at the bank actually was, a number of alarm bells were set ringing around that time.
Perhaps another thing to take away from this is to compare the response here from the PRA, with the responses mentioned elsewhere on this board by the FCA.
For now, I think the fully authorised banks are pretty effectively and robustly regulated.
The fully funded business model The Bank of London says it runs is an interesting one and it would be great to see it work out here in the UK.
I would be surprised if the FT and others don't write more about it in the near future.
|
|
observer
Member of DD Central
Posts: 872
Likes: 1,380
|
Post by observer on Sept 19, 2024 6:20:24 GMT
I would be surprised if the FT and others don't write more about it in the near future. On the next day, the FT did write more. "Inside the Bank of London, the unicorn that had an ‘immediate’ need for cash Fintech’s short history includes leasing Archegos’s old offices and hiring a convicted fraudster" www.ft.com/content/c09c34b1-a6aa-466f-b876-2607fd8a4f5f
|
|
mogish
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 527
|
Post by mogish on Sept 19, 2024 14:24:05 GMT
Please tell me this is Not blme bank of London and middle east.
|
|
observer
Member of DD Central
Posts: 872
Likes: 1,380
|
Post by observer on Sept 19, 2024 17:56:38 GMT
|
|
observer
Member of DD Central
Posts: 872
Likes: 1,380
|
Post by observer on Sept 20, 2024 15:15:18 GMT
|
|
observer
Member of DD Central
Posts: 872
Likes: 1,380
|
Post by observer on Nov 8, 2024 20:39:21 GMT
|
|