gt94sss2
Member of DD Central
Posts: 281
Likes: 137
|
Post by gt94sss2 on Apr 7, 2015 13:21:06 GMT
When I choose the default 'Click here to view PDF version for 2014-2015' (or other years) on the tax statement page - I get a .pdf statement for 2012-3 instead..
I have to use the option to manually specific my dates at the bottom of the page and use update .pdf option to get a correct statement for 14-15.
|
|
|
Post by ribble on Apr 7, 2015 14:05:31 GMT
Yes, I had the same problem earlier so sent them an e-mail around 1.15 p.m. Not heard from them yet. Well done on the manual work-around - I didn't think of that!
|
|
am
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 601
|
Post by am on Apr 7, 2015 15:54:35 GMT
Also reported earlier today. But when I tried the update .pdf option (at least I thought I was trying it), it still gave me the 2012/3 return.
Just been back to the site, and the PDF is now correct.
|
|
kermie
Member of DD Central
Posts: 689
Likes: 462
|
Post by kermie on Apr 18, 2015 20:28:25 GMT
I'm confused.
The PDF for 2014-2015 looks "plausible". As does the PDF for 2013-2014.
But the figure on the "Tax - Your Statement" web page (i.e., the page which has the PDF links on it) also shows a figure against "Income" itself - this figure is a bit larger than the 2014-2015 PDF figure, it doesn't match the PDF 2013-2014 figure, and it's not the sum of the two years either.
What gives?
The web page says use one figure, and the PDF says use another....
|
|
spiral
Member of DD Central
Posts: 909
Likes: 456
|
Post by spiral on Apr 19, 2015 9:20:14 GMT
But the figure on the "Tax - Your Statement" web page (i.e., the page which has the PDF links on it) also shows a figure against "Income" itself - this figure is a bit larger than the 2014-2015 PDF figure The two are the same for me!
|
|
|
Post by p2plender on Apr 19, 2015 11:55:12 GMT
ok here
|
|
kermie
Member of DD Central
Posts: 689
Likes: 462
|
Post by kermie on Apr 19, 2015 17:49:55 GMT
Thanks, spiral and p2plender. I'm not sure what I've done exactly - but it seems to have been fixed. I "regenerated" the PDF a few times, and after a coupe of goes it seems to have "corrected" it. Sadly it settled on the larger of the two values ;-)
|
|