gb007
Member of DD Central
Posts: 131
Likes: 74
|
Post by gb007 on Jul 20, 2015 16:27:35 GMT
Following introduction of the Personal Savings Allowance from 6 April 2016, banks and building societies will no longer deduct tax from interest paid on savings accounts and deposits. In view of this, HMRC invites comments on proposed changes to the deduction of income tax at source rules for peer-to-peer interest. HMRC notes that if a decision were made to abolish the deduction of tax at source regime, then the complex deduction-at-source issues currently being faced by the P2P sector would generally fall away. Why should P2P platforms have the administrative burden and cost of being tax collectors if banks do not have to? Have your say! www.gov.uk/government/consultations/deduction-of-income-tax-from-interest-peer-to-peer-lending Closing date for comments: 18 September 2015
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Jul 20, 2015 19:32:50 GMT
I found this to be very interesting:
"10. Under the existing rules, which apply generally to interest other than that paid by banks or buil ding societies on deposits: ... o However where the interest is due to a lender who is resident outside the UK, the borrower (or the P2P platform) is required to deduct income tax at source from the interest for payment to HMRC, and to pay the interest to the lender net of tax, regardless of the identity of the borrower."
I've not heard of any platforms following this rule. I wonder whether all that allow non-UK lenders are breaking it?
The other parts of 10 are interesting as well and I suspect that there may be a platform or two not getting them all right.
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Jul 20, 2015 20:06:11 GMT
Also interesting, MoneyThing appears to have a strong interest in responding to the consultation on deduction of of tax from P2P interest because one proposal is to remove one of MoneyThing's competitive advantages, the lack of an obligation to deduct income tax before paying interest, because loans at MoneyThing are generally or always for less than 12 months- short interest. This appears to inhibit competition between platforms in the sector.
"49. The government is therefore considering whether for P2P loans the obligation to deduct tax is no longer linked to the duration of the loan and should apply equally to both yearly interest and short interest"
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 1,546
|
Post by pikestaff on Jul 21, 2015 6:53:03 GMT
I posted a version of this on another thread but it really belongs here. The current position re (lack of) tax deductions puzzles me greatly. According to the consultation document, all of the platforms should already be deducting interest at source on payments by companies to individual lenders, or having their borrowers do so, even if the lenders are resident in the UK. See the first bullet below (full text of para 10 of the con doc): 10. Under the existing rules, which apply generally to interest other than that paid by banks or building societies on deposits: - Where the borrower is a company who pays interest due to an individual, the borrower (or an intermediary such as the P2P platform) is required to deduct income tax at source from the interest for payment to HMRC, and pay the interest to the lender net of tax.
- Where the borrower is a company who pays interest due to another UK company, neither the borrower nor the P2P platform is required to deduct tax at source, and interest may be paid gross.
- Where the borrower is an individual (including a sole trader) who pays interest to either an individual or a company resident in the UK, neither the borrower nor the P2P platform is required to tax deduct at source and interest may be paid gross.
- However where the interest is due to a lender who is resident outside the UK, the borrower (or the P2P platform) is required to deduct income tax at source from the interest for payment to HMRC, and to pay the interest to the lender net of tax, regardless of the identity of the borrower.
None of the platforms that I'm involved with is deducting interest. There was a brief flurry of excitement when one borrower on AC decided to deduct at source and AC agreed that they were right to do so, but this was resolved following a meeting with HMRC where it was agreed that deductions would not be made. We do not know what happened at the meeting or the basis of the decision. I assumed at the time that it was a concession pending the consultation, and had expected the consultation paper to be drafted along the lines of "we have been allowing this by concession because of the acknowledged practical issues but now we are consulting on the way forward". But it isn't. It assumes the platforms are currently deducting interest at source, which they are not. I'm baffled...
|
|
arbster
Member of DD Central
Posts: 810
Likes: 426
|
Post by arbster on Jul 21, 2015 7:20:21 GMT
I think that where the HMRC's paper refers to "current legislation", it means the "currently scheduled legislation that has been previously announced and will take effect from April 2017 unless the outcome of this consultation is that we reverse the decision". Hence, from April 2017 all those bullet points will become law and it will be incumbent upon P2P borrowers, or platforms, to deduct income tax, exactly 1 year after it stopped being a requirement for banks to do it.
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 1,546
|
Post by pikestaff on Jul 21, 2015 7:40:19 GMT
|
|
arbster
Member of DD Central
Posts: 810
Likes: 426
|
Post by arbster on Jul 21, 2015 7:58:09 GMT
Thanks pikestaff. From my initial perusal, that whole area appears to be an anachronistic mess, so hopefully the consultation will lead to wider rationalisation and a more efficient system for all of us.
|
|
rogerbu
Member of DD Central
Posts: 398
Likes: 213
|
Post by rogerbu on Jul 21, 2015 10:53:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by easteregg on Jul 21, 2015 11:21:34 GMT
|
|
gb007
Member of DD Central
Posts: 131
Likes: 74
|
Post by gb007 on Jul 21, 2015 11:37:05 GMT
HMRC are aware that the deduction at source legislation was not designed with P2P in mind and have been telling platforms/P2P borrowers not to deduct tax from interest until specific legislation is in place.
When creating the legislation to commence in 2017, surely the same logic applies to P2P interest as to bank and building society interest: the significant majority will have interest within the tax free Personal Savings Allowance or ISA's. There is no point deducting tax and then the majority claiming it back from HMRC.
In addition, for those banks currently responsible for deducting the tax and paying it across to HMRC the removal of requirement to deduct tax on interest payments represents an important administrative simplification.
IMHO, abolishing the tax deduction scheme for banks and building societies but imposing it on P2P platforms give banks and building societies an unfair competitive advantage.
|
|
webwiz
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 210
|
Post by webwiz on Jul 28, 2015 14:26:33 GMT
Archover do deduct withholding tax. They are the only one that do TTBOMK. I wish they wouldn't.
|
|