|
Post by Financial Thing on Jul 20, 2015 17:02:04 GMT
I pulled out my calculator and ran some numbers on the 2 bed semi in Durham investment.
Here's my maths:
House purchase NET cost: £57,650 (includes PM 5% fee and other fees) Net rents for 24 months: £10,004 (this is generous since I usually calculate on 11 months to account for a vacant month) Repair fund: £1,000 (should always have 10% of rents set aside for tenant damages and repairs)
Projected valuation after 2 yrs: £67,898 Projected growth: £10,248 (£67,898 - £57,650)
Property Moose 15% Fee on Growth: £1,106 (15% of £7,379) Sales fees: £2,689 Total Fees: £3,795
END RESULT:
House purchase price: £57,650 Rent Income: £10,004 House sale: £63,103 (£67,898 - £1,000 repairs - £3,795 in sales fees) TOTAL REVENUE: £15,457 (£5,453 growth + £10,004 rental income) ROI: 26.81%
I'm sure I must have missed something.
I believe the zero repair costs estimation in the acquisition numbers is is too conservative , especially looking at the awful red carpet in the living room but other than that and aside of the obvious unknowns, these seem like strong numbers.
I'm wondering why interest isn't stronger on this property?
|
|
pom
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 1,244
|
Post by pom on Jul 20, 2015 17:51:12 GMT
Pretty much every other property (except for the Stan Laurel one) since I joined has had higher projected returns, the HMOs etc significantly so, so maybe everyone's put all their pennies in those or are holding out for more properties with better projections.
|
|
|
Post by Financial Thing on Jul 21, 2015 15:17:52 GMT
makes sense
|
|
|
Post by ogwellian on Jul 23, 2015 9:31:25 GMT
The two current properties are taking what seems an age to fill. Is it the properties or lack of funds from investors?
Are PM committed to purchase or do they have a timed option?
At least those who have gone in are getting 3%, but is this sustainable?
|
|
pom
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 1,244
|
Post by pom on Jul 23, 2015 10:35:26 GMT
I think it does ebb and flow a bit - the first couple I invested in took a fair while to fill, then there were a few that filled really quickly, and now for some reason these do seem a little slower, but actually they've only been open 1-2 weeks
|
|
|
Post by oldboy on Jul 26, 2015 18:50:52 GMT
Hey everyone, I created a little sheet on google drive to calculate the predicted return for the investments. It uses the numbers PM gives and turns them into interest p.a. (the green boxes). docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PZbvNuPprgmNl-XVYwgYxAWk7Dv8852FmKNyCDz904A/edit?usp=sharingI filled it out for some of the older opportunities and for the "2 bed semi Durham" at the bottom. You should be able to copy the whole sheet and enter your own numbers if you want to. I am also happy to implement changes if you have any requests. The grey fields are the ones that need to be filled out. The rest calculates itself. The actual internal rate of return should be a bit higher because the rents are paid during the year and not at the end of it, as my calculator assumes. But I ignore that fact out of three reasons: - it would make the table quite large to enter every single month
- the difference in interest it makes in the end is quite low
(around 0.3%)
- I wouldn't reinvest the rents immediately anyway but wait for them to accumulate for a while
Let me know what you think. Oldboy
|
|
|
Post by Financial Thing on Jul 26, 2015 22:46:22 GMT
oldboy Thanks for the spreadsheet. Copy and pasting didn't work for me but file > save as a copy does. I think you are missing the 15% estimated fee Property Moose charges for growth on capital? They don't include this on the Estimated Costs page by the way. You will need to add a field for estimated value at the end of the term and then have the sheet do some extra calculations. Too much work for my Excel challenged brain but if you feel like adding it in, it would be most helpful
|
|
|
Post by oldboy on Jul 27, 2015 9:26:01 GMT
oldboy Thanks for the spreadsheet. Copy and pasting didn't work for me but file > save as a copy does. I think you are missing the 15% estimated fee Property Moose charges for growth on capital? They don't include this on the Estimated Costs page by the way. You will need to add a field for estimated value at the end of the term and then have the sheet do some extra calculations. Too much work for my Excel challenged brain but if you feel like adding it in, it would be most helpful Thank you for the feedback, optionstrader. The 15% fees are there. I just labeled them incorrectly as "PM-Fees 5%". I now corrected it to "PM-Fees 15%". The calculation has already been correct with 15%. The formula I use for the PM fees is: ((price on sale) - (acqusition cost) - (sales costs)) * 15% So in our case: (67.898 - 58.000 - 2869) * 15% = 1054 I wonder about the acquisition cost. You used numbers from the sheet PM gives, which sum up to 57.650 pounds. But they collect 58.000 pounds. What happens to the 350 pounds that are being collected unnecessarily? Does anybody know?
|
|
|
Post by Financial Thing on Jul 27, 2015 11:40:10 GMT
Well done oldboy. I'm not sure about the missing amount. Maybe I added incorrectly? I believe there should also be an estimate in there for repair costs. Over the lease period repairs will be needed, and particularly when the tenants move out and the house needs freshening up. It's a largely unknown cost factor but I would say 10% of the rents collected is the standard.
|
|
|
Post by oldboy on Jul 27, 2015 13:15:52 GMT
Well done oldboy. I'm not sure about the missing amount. Maybe I added incorrectly? I believe there should also be an estimate in there for repair costs. Over the lease period repairs will be needed, and particularly when the tenants move out and the house needs freshening up. It's a largely unknown cost factor but I would say 10% of the rents collected is the standard. You added correctly. I get the same result. Maybe they return the unused amount with the first payment or they keep it in the provision fund. You can now enter the percentage of the rents that you want to subtract for repairs. The field is on the right side of the tables above the interest. If you don't want to consider possible repairs, just enter 0%.
|
|
|
Post by Financial Thing on Jul 27, 2015 13:40:16 GMT
Jolly good, it's a very helpful spreadsheet. Maybe email PM about the mystery missing money?
|
|
|
Post by propertymoose on Jul 27, 2015 16:50:28 GMT
Hi all
Firstly, I love the spreadsheet Oldboy. Really great stuff and I'm sure people will find it useful. We have thought about include IRR on the site and it's something that we may look at in the future.
Hopefully, I can help to answer your question too. As each share is £500, we round up the total required to the nearest £500. This money is then held in the SPV's account to be used for any rental costs. Any surplus at the end of the term (which there usually will be due to us retaining a flat 20% corporation tax without any allowances being accounted for) will be returned to investors.
In relation to the speed of funding on the current two properties, they are proving a bit slower than the previous properties but I think a lot of people are away and it is the typical summer slowdown. We do see the funding level ebb and flow but hopefully everyone will get behind these properties when we pay out the rent on Friday.
We usually have properties secured for around 3 months so no issues there and the 3% annual bonus is, of course, being accrued.
Kind regards
Andrew
|
|
|
Post by oldboy on Jul 27, 2015 19:31:00 GMT
Great to have you here to answer our questions, Andrew. And I'm glad you like the spreadsheet. Thanks for explaining what happens to the extra money that is being collected during the funding phase.
While you are here already, could you confirm that my calculation of the 15% Propertymoose fee is correct? I use this formula: ((price on sale) - (acqusition cost) - (sales costs)) * 15%
So in the case of the 2 Bedroom Semi-Detached, County Durham: (67.898 - 58.000 - 2869) * 15% = 1054
Is that about right? Or Should I use 54.000 instead of 58.000, because the property price at the beginning is 54.000?
|
|
|
Post by propertymoose on Jul 29, 2015 12:10:50 GMT
Hi Oldboy
Your calc looks right to me as we would use the total fund amount to work out the net numbers. Hope that helps but do let me know if you need anything else. You can also email us at support@... or me on andrew@....
kind regards
Andrew
|
|
|
Post by ogwellian on Aug 10, 2015 18:23:55 GMT
Nearly four weeks in this one and still only 38% funded.
Frustrating, when new properties are coming on line and filling quickly.
|
|