SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875 
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on Aug 5, 2016 17:36:41 GMT
If anyone took offence at the ironic circumstances that had amused me then I extend my sincere apologies.
|
|
|
|
Post by chielamangus on Aug 5, 2016 18:17:13 GMT
If anyone took offence at the ironic circumstances that had amused me then I extend my sincere apologies. Now that DOES sound ironic.
|
|
|
|
Post by easilyparted on Aug 5, 2016 18:36:47 GMT
I've been relishing the day the certain owner of said office block chases me for defamation,bring it on.
Failure to respect this will result in your stay here being a short one.
RM Sorry,kneejerk reaction to the previous post. PM is not in the public domain,hence the Defamation Act does not apply.
|
|
|
|
Post by easilyparted on Aug 5, 2016 18:53:11 GMT
In that case, you have missed the point. The borrower's MO has been explained elsewhere and that is not the reason that people are annoyed. Exactly. I'm out and will be donating any interest from these loans to an appropriate farmers charity. Very generous,may I recommend The Addington Fund,Farm Community Network or RABI,all have tried their best to help the victims of this man.I could say more but I believe the megaphone batteries are failing.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrclondon on Aug 5, 2016 20:10:46 GMT
Sorry,kneejerk reaction to the previous post. PM is not in the public domain,hence the Defamation Act does not apply. All publications to third parties can potentially be defamatory. i.e you can email Mr X and tell him he is fraudster, thats fine. However if you email anyone else that Mr X is a fraudster, then you are potentially defaming them unless you personally can prove to a court that Mr X is a fraudster. Same applies to PM threads ... claiming Mr X is a fraudster in a PM thread that is seen by anyone orther than Mr X, is again potentially defaming him unless you personally can prove to a court that Mr X is a fraudster. Take a step back, it is entirely possible that you easilyparted could indeed prove to a court that Mr X is a fraudster. I somehow doubt any other participant in such a thread on this forum could prove Mr X is fraudster, and could be opening themselves up to damages for defamation as a result. The Defamation Act 2013 does apply to PM threads.(Mr X for the purpose of this post is entirely fictitious and does not refer to any specific individual).
|
|
goopy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 307
Likes: 144
|
Post by goopy on Aug 5, 2016 20:48:23 GMT
Sorry,kneejerk reaction to the previous post. PM is not in the public domain,hence the Defamation Act does not apply. All publications to third parties can potentially be defamatory. i.e you can email Mr X and tell him he is fraudster, thats fine. However if you email anyone else that Mr X is a fraudster, then you are potentially defaming them unless you personally can prove to a court that Mr X is a fraudster. Same applies to PM threads ... claiming Mr X is a fraudster in a PM thread that is seen by anyone orther than Mr X, is again potentially defaming him unless you personally can prove to a court that Mr X is a fraudster. Take a step back, it is entirely possible that you easilyparted could indeed prove to a court that Mr X is a fraudster. I somehow doubt any other participant in such a thread on this forum could prove Mr X is fraudster, and could be opening themselves up to damages for defamation as a result. The Defamation Act 2013 does apply to PM threads.(Mr X for the purpose of this post is entirely fictitious and does not refer to any specific individual). I'm sure easilyparted would help me prove Mr X is a fraudster if he came after me... Aint that right m8 
|
|
registerme
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 6,437
|
Post by registerme on Aug 5, 2016 21:05:41 GMT
I'm sure easilyparted would help me prove Mr X is a fraudster if he came after me... Aint that right m8
Now, this thread returns to sensible (ie in adherence to the forum rules; and if you have issues with moderator action take them to the Feedback forum) discussion of PBL64 or it gets locked, and all discussion of it is prohibited for a month or two. And then nobody benefits.
|
|
ped
Member of DD Central
Posts: 255
Likes: 84
|
Post by ped on Aug 5, 2016 22:01:40 GMT
Nice to see someone is still buying 64, my little bit is working its way down the queue at a steady rate keep buying whoever you are. Thanks
|
|
Liz
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 1,297
|
Post by Liz on Aug 5, 2016 22:09:32 GMT
Nice to see someone is still buying 64, my little bit is working its way down the queue at a steady rate keep buying whoever you are. Thanks Yep. I had 120k in front if me on Tuesday, now for loan part is 67% sold 
|
|
ped
Member of DD Central
Posts: 255
Likes: 84
|
Post by ped on Aug 5, 2016 22:11:30 GMT
Glass of white once it has all gone then Liz?
|
|
Liz
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 1,297
|
Post by Liz on Aug 5, 2016 22:14:19 GMT
Glass of white once it has all gone then Liz? Yes. Milk in my tea; I,m trying to quit anything stronger.
|
|
ped
Member of DD Central
Posts: 255
Likes: 84
|
Post by ped on Aug 5, 2016 22:17:17 GMT
Glass of white once it has all gone then Liz? Yes. Milk in my tea; I,m trying to quit anything stronger. Good for you. 
|
|
edward
Member of DD Central
Posts: 66
Likes: 24
|
Post by edward on Aug 6, 2016 5:36:58 GMT
I made a note there was £95015 ahead of me when put up for sale at start of month, and was amazed that my holding sold last night. I had already been enjoying a glass (or 2) of red!
|
|
|
|
Post by easilyparted on Aug 6, 2016 9:11:25 GMT
All publications to third parties can potentially be defamatory. i.e you can email Mr X and tell him he is fraudster, thats fine. However if you email anyone else that Mr X is a fraudster, then you are potentially defaming them unless you personally can prove to a court that Mr X is a fraudster. Same applies to PM threads ... claiming Mr X is a fraudster in a PM thread that is seen by anyone orther than Mr X, is again potentially defaming him unless you personally can prove to a court that Mr X is a fraudster. Take a step back, it is entirely possible that you easilyparted could indeed prove to a court that Mr X is a fraudster. I somehow doubt any other participant in such a thread on this forum could prove Mr X is fraudster, and could be opening themselves up to damages for defamation as a result. The Defamation Act 2013 does apply to PM threads.(Mr X for the purpose of this post is entirely fictitious and does not refer to any specific individual). I'm sure easilyparted would help me prove Mr X is a fraudster if he came after me... Aint that right m8 You trying to get me banned,my lips are sealed,who is Mr X and where is this tin shed 
|
|
ben
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 589
|
Post by ben on Aug 6, 2016 9:19:06 GMT
I'm sure easilyparted would help me prove Mr X is a fraudster if he came after me... Aint that right m8 You trying to get me banned,my lips are sealed,who is Mr X and where is this tin shed I assume the borrorower in this loan has previously upset you in some way easilyparted.
|
|
