agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,055
Likes: 4,441
|
Post by agent69 on Feb 23, 2014 14:25:48 GMT
|
|
debeast
(o)(o)
Posts: 238
Likes: 44
|
Post by debeast on Feb 28, 2014 9:14:56 GMT
Fingers crossed
|
|
|
Post by swissmate76 on Mar 15, 2014 23:23:43 GMT
rumours, rumours, no basis in fact, actually SIPS more likely and also anything under 5 years would be out of ISAS ayway
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Mar 16, 2014 1:34:19 GMT
... and also anything under 5 years would be out of ISAS ayway I don't follow. Could you please explain?
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Mar 16, 2014 2:02:19 GMT
First thing is to work out whether the investment would be within a cash ISA or a stocks and shares ISA. The way to do that is the 5% test. The 5% test is paragraph 7.39 of the Guidance Notes for ISA Managers: " 7.39 The 5% test is satisfied if, at the date of purchase o there was no guarantee or agreement that the investor would receive 95% or more of their purchase price at any time in the next 5 years, or o the nature of the investments held did not significantly limit the risk to the investor’s capital to 5% loss or less at any time in the next 5 years
All information available at the time – sales literature, terms and conditions, etc – must be taken into account in determining whether the test is satisfied." A S&S ISA has a restriction that any securities (like bonds) must have a remaining term of at least five years at the time they are purchased within the ISA, this is paragraph 7.14 of the Guidance Notes. If this test is failed the investment could be held in a cash ISA instead, as money market funds could, if you could find any cash ISA that allowed holding funds. Those properties of current law would bar most or all lending-based P2P from being held in a S&S ISA. There are either guarantees or demonstrated loss rates that are too low to pass the 5% test and the term is almost always less than five years. Any proposal to allow P2P could change the law to allow P2P within S&S ISA, cash ISA or both, depending on the specific properties of each type of P2P.
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 1,546
|
Post by pikestaff on Mar 16, 2014 8:45:26 GMT
rumours, rumours, no basis in fact, actually SIPS more likely and also anything under 5 years would be out of ISAS ayway It is more than a rumour. As the link says, a working party set up by the Treasury is exploring ways to include p2x in a stocks and shares ISA wrapper [my emphasis] potentially from 2015. My impression from the TC forum is that the Treasury is serious about this. Obviously it will require some change to the law. If it does happen, it is not yet clear how it will be implemented. It may not be as easy or flexible as we might hope. I have a stocks and shares ISA with TD Direct. I doubt very much that I will be able to simply invest directly in my favourite p2p platforms through their site, and certainly not in individual loans. How would the provider of the wrapper get paid, for a start? More likely, I think, are pooled funds of some kind, with a management fee. ISA wrappers might be offered by the p2x platforms themselves (at least the larger ones), or it might be possible to purchase p2x funds through other ISA wrapper providers (who would receive a commission paid by the fund manager out of the management fee). Whether the tax saving is enough to pay for the inevitable fees remains to be seen. There may be little net benefit for basic rate taxpayers, after fees. One thing that worries me is the Treasury may see ISA wrappers as an excuse not to sort out the non-deductibility of loan losses, on the basis that in a tax free wrapper it does not matter. That would be very annoying. PS I am sure that p2x will not be made eligible for cash ISAs, for two reasons: (1) it is not what they have proposed; (2) it would go against the thrust of p2x regulation. The FCA is keen for investors to understand that p2x investments are not like cash deposits - they are riskier and not guaranteed.
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Mar 16, 2014 12:13:29 GMT
Wrapper providers can't take a commission from the P2P firm. It's against FCA rules for new investments. There are still transitional arrangements in place for DIY platforms that allow it for existing holdings until April 2016, but even there not for new purchases.
It'd take a rapacious platform provider to take much of the 9% or so of my Isapankur investment that would be my income tax bill each year if I wasn't paying compensating money into pensions (9% is the tax, not the whole interest). A normal 0.25-0.3% sort of platform fee would be easy to accept. That level would also work for even the low interest rates currently available via the big UK P2P firms.
I agree that P2P is not suitable for cash ISAs. The risks are too high and it lacks the FSCS protection that is present for most cash ISA investments, though not all of them - not all structured products are structured deposits that get FSCS protection.
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 1,546
|
Post by pikestaff on Mar 16, 2014 21:57:43 GMT
Wrapper providers can't take a commission from the P2P firm. It's against FCA rules for new investments. You are right of course. They will be taking a platform fee, instead of trail commission. I still expect the structure to be fund managers run p2x funds, which the wrapper providers make available on their platforms. TD Direct's platform fee for unit trusts etc is 0.35% and I guess that might be their fee for p2x, to which you'd need to add whatever the fund manager charges. My guess is the total fee (platform fee + fund manager's fee) will be close to 1%. Some p2x funds may also run their own wrappers, but I suspect the total fee is still likely to be of that order. I think most p2x investments will pay about 5% net of losses (Isepankur may be an exception) in which case 1% fees will equal the tax saved for a basic rate taxpayer.
|
|
|
Post by wellesleyco on Mar 19, 2014 13:41:45 GMT
No Mention for Peer-to-Peer today. However some developments for savers and to the ISA framework. We await to hear any updates on P2P inclusion from the Treasury and their working committee as and when they feel it appropriate to do so..
|
|
|
Post by batchoy on Mar 19, 2014 14:13:00 GMT
No Mention for Peer-to-Peer today. However some developments for savers and to the ISA framework. We await to hear any updates on P2P inclusion from the Treasury and their working committee as and when they feel it appropriate to do so.. Not mentioned in the statement but it is in the budget document - www.gov.uk/...../37630_Budget_2014_Web_Accessible.pdfas is the lifting of the restrictions on maturity dates on securities in ISAs which helps pave the way for P2P lending. As yet I can find no mention of tax changes for loses on loans though.
|
|
|
Post by wellesleyco on Mar 19, 2014 14:52:37 GMT
No Mention for Peer-to-Peer today. However some developments for savers and to the ISA framework. We await to hear any updates on P2P inclusion from the Treasury and their working committee as and when they feel it appropriate to do so.. Not mentioned in the statement but it is in the budget document - www.gov.uk/...../37630_Budget_2014_Web_Accessible.pdfas is the lifting of the restrictions on maturity dates on securities in ISAs which helps pave the way for P2P lending. As yet I can find no mention of tax changes for loses on loans though. It appears I overlooked that. This is fantastic news.
|
|
|
Post by batchoy on Mar 19, 2014 14:59:08 GMT
Not mentioned in the statement but it is in the budget document - www.gov.uk/...../37630_Budget_2014_Web_Accessible.pdfas is the lifting of the restrictions on maturity dates on securities in ISAs which helps pave the way for P2P lending. As yet I can find no mention of tax changes for loses on loans though. It appears I overlooked that. This is fantastic news. Its difficult to work out when though as there is no date, however the associated numbers in table 2.1 item 9 suggest that cost to the Government is going to be negligible until the 2016-17 tax year, which would indicate that the change is immediate (2014-15 tax year) as the cost is neither - (not applicable) nor 0.
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 1,546
|
Post by pikestaff on Mar 19, 2014 15:21:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wellesleyco on Mar 19, 2014 15:26:47 GMT
It appears I overlooked that. This is fantastic news. Its difficult to work out when though as there is no date, however the associated numbers in table 2.1 item 9 suggest that cost to the Government is going to be negligible until the 2016-17 tax year, which would indicate that the change is immediate (2014-15 tax year) as the cost is neither - (not applicable) nor 0. batchoy I agree having now read the document. This will need clarification in due course. I would expect comment from Christine Farnish is not too far away and she will no doubt have all the details.
|
|
angrysaveruk
Member of DD Central
Say No To T.D.S
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 790
|
Post by angrysaveruk on Mar 19, 2014 21:15:50 GMT
Certainly exciting news for the P2P industry. Having government "support" like this can only hope the industry grow. Although will probably mean rates will drop on Rate Setter
|
|