treeman
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 557
|
Post by treeman on Jan 1, 2016 18:34:40 GMT
Both of those parts are listed at par so the original rate on each part will be the same as offered as the Buyer Rate now (possible rounding error excepted). As am has explained, non-property loans up until a couple of months ago were filled by reverse auction so parts are held at a wide variety of rates, depending how well the buyer did originally. In this instance, the 9.2% part is clearly the better deal over the 9.0% part. [That said, I don't tend to hold anything older than 6 months and I'd certainly be nervous about this loan, given the sector they are operating in (oil & gas). 9.2% is a long way below the current fixed rates that B loans are sold at on the PM (10% - 10.6% depending on term) so personally I'd give it a miss and wait for some decent new PM loans to be listed next week] tomtom As SteveT says - I'd wait for the PM to wake up next week for the sake of a few days. I see little attraction in buying SMEs at below current PM fixed rates. That said, having just had a quick peek, and if you're desperate to get a few quid invested ..... there are a couple of Property Loans up at -0.5% discount still. You get a small discount on the principal, asset backing as opposed to fingers crossed with the SMEs, and 8% whilst holding them. Could do worse...... Oh, and no it's not me selling them ! 17043 and 17048. £40 parts on both. There's a ton of property at PAR too ..... Best advice I can give is to read (and re-read!) these threads thoroughly - there's plenty of explanations, tips, strategies etc to help get your head round it all.
|
|
tomtom
Member of DD Central
Posts: 262
Likes: 39
|
Post by tomtom on Jan 1, 2016 19:29:06 GMT
treeman thanks how do I call up these two part please
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on Jan 1, 2016 19:50:40 GMT
treeman thanks how do I call up these two part please Just search for the loan number in Loan Parts
|
|
tomtom
Member of DD Central
Posts: 262
Likes: 39
|
Post by tomtom on Jan 2, 2016 12:23:38 GMT
Thanks have now found them and see that these two items are interested paid only each month with purchase cost being repaid at termination of loan, and my question is how do you calculate if this is better than being paid combination of part principle + interest each month. Realise that this item is for a very small amount but if the principle was say for a greater amount < £500 at this rate of 8% would you be better of having principle being paid during the term which would allow you to re invest it again while the original loan was being paid down?
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on Jan 2, 2016 12:35:20 GMT
Thanks have now found them and see that these two items are interested paid only each month with purchase cost being repaid at termination of loan, and my question is how do you calculate if this is better than being paid combination of part principle + interest each month. Realise that this item is for a very small amount but if the principle was say for a greater amount < £500 at this rate of 8% would you be better of having principle being paid during the term which would allow you to re invest it again while the original loan was being paid down? Well that is a very minor consideration and depends what options you think you'll have for reinvesting capital further down the line. The much bigger consideration IMHO is that the property loans have hard asset security behind them whereas most SME loans on FC have only the dubious figleaf of a personal guarantee (which may well prove worthless)
|
|
|
Post by carpecyprinidae on Jan 2, 2016 13:22:41 GMT
Thanks have now found them and see that these two items are interested paid only each month with purchase cost being repaid at termination of loan, and my question is how do you calculate if this is better than being paid combination of part principle + interest each month. Realise that this item is for a very small amount but if the principle was say for a greater amount < £500 at this rate of 8% would you be better of having principle being paid during the term which would allow you to re invest it again while the original loan was being paid down? If you arent being repaid principle every month, you are paid more interest as each payment is interest on the total value of the loan part. Whereas if you are repaid principal every month it sits in your cash balance, earning no interest, until you have enough principal+interest to buy another loan part. With the properly loan it seems to me there's more effective allocation of funds to earning money.... While in this thread (hello everyone, my first post!), just like to add that I put £4000 into FC during December (previously invested a total of about £980 over a year or so) and managed to place it all on the SM without paying any premiums, in a total of 9 days, over 140 different businesses. Quite pleased with that, especially since most of the parts were at above current rates and all of them were A+ or A rated Will be keeping autobid turned off for a while, I think. As it didnt even try to place my money on the SM
|
|
ablender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 555
|
Post by ablender on Jan 2, 2016 13:54:01 GMT
Will be keeping autobid turned off for a while, I think. As it didnt even try to place my money on the SMThat is a very interesting comment.
|
|
tomtom
Member of DD Central
Posts: 262
Likes: 39
|
Post by tomtom on Jan 2, 2016 14:44:05 GMT
Thanks for your comments, beginning to understand a bit more so lets me go to next stage, regarding sm looked at part with following information:
Buyer rate 17.9% sale price £20.15 premium 0.08 (0.4%). Original rate 18.1 fixed band E 1 payment made 59 to go.
I'm I correct is saying the sale price is made up of £20.00 (original cost) + 0.08(premiam) + 0.07 interest to date?
But why has buyer interest rate dropped by 0.2% after only 1 payment?
|
|
am
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 601
|
Post by am on Jan 2, 2016 14:46:10 GMT
Thanks have now found them and see that these two items are interested paid only each month with purchase cost being repaid at termination of loan, and my question is how do you calculate if this is better than being paid combination of part principle + interest each month. Realise that this item is for a very small amount but if the principle was say for a greater amount < £500 at this rate of 8% would you be better of having principle being paid during the term which would allow you to re invest it again while the original loan was being paid down? Well that is a very minor consideration and depends what options you think you'll have for reinvesting capital further down the line. The much bigger consideration IMHO is that the property loans have hard asset security behind them whereas most SME loans on FC have only the dubious figleaf of a personal guarantee (which may well prove worthless) A non-amortising (bullet) repayment requires that the borrower can get his hands on funds equal to the capital value of the loan at the end of the loan. That makes them appropriate for loans for individual projects, such as property development loans, where cash inflows naturally occur at the end of the loan period. For loans for other purposes, such as working capital, I think that an amortising loan, where the capital is repaid over the course of the loan out of the borrower's cash flow, is to be preferred, as otherwise there is a risk of a borrower paying the interest, but not generating enough additional cash flow (or paying it out as dividends) to pay off the capital at the end, so one would be dependent on the borrower being able to take out a new loan to repay the old one.
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Jan 2, 2016 14:56:18 GMT
Will be keeping autobid turned off for a while, I think. As it didnt even try to place my money on the SMThat is a very interesting comment. I'd be even more worried if it had, since autobid is generally very good at buying what all the canny manual bidders are busy avoiding! It will also not buy the best deal on the shelf (except by accident). Well done 'minnow' for avoiding the pitfall most folks (including me) initially fall into.
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Jan 2, 2016 15:01:37 GMT
Thanks for your comments, beginning to understand a bit more so lets me go to next stage, regarding sm looked at part with following information: Buyer rate 17.9% sale price £20.15 premium 0.08 (0.4%). Original rate 18.1 fixed band E 1 payment made 59 to go. I'm I correct is saying the sale price is made up of £20.00 (original cost) + 0.08(premiam) + 0.07 interest to date? But why has buyer interest rate dropped by 0.2% after only 1 payment? Because the buyer rate is calculated on the £20.08 you are paying for it instead of the £20 it is actually worth (i.e. you are losing 8p over the term, whatever that is), although I don't see how the principal can still be £20 if one payment has been made, so it's more likely to be £19.80 remaining principal and 27p of accrued interest, or similar. You really need to understand how all this works (read the forum, or even the FC forums) before you put your hand in your pocket.
|
|
kaya
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 718
|
Post by kaya on Jan 2, 2016 15:17:24 GMT
Thanks for your comments, beginning to understand a bit more so lets me go to next stage, regarding sm looked at part with following information: Buyer rate 17.9% sale price £20.15 premium 0.08 (0.4%). Original rate 18.1 fixed band E 1 payment made 59 to go. I'm I correct is saying the sale price is made up of £20.00 (original cost) + 0.08(premiam) + 0.07 interest to date? But why has buyer interest rate dropped by 0.2% after only 1 payment? The loan part was for £20, one repayment made means there is £19.67 left to be repaid. A premium of 0.4% adds 0.08 to this amount, so the cost is £19.75, plus accrued interest to the date of sale. The accrued interest since the first repayment must be £0.40, so the total cost is £20.15. The loan had a rate of 18.1%, but if you are paying extra - a premium - then the effective rate of return will be less. With this example, the 8 pence premium is costing you 0.2% of your return. Think that's right!
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 2, 2016 16:37:45 GMT
Thanks for your comments, beginning to understand a bit more so lets me go to next stage, regarding sm looked at part with following information: Buyer rate 17.9% sale price £20.15 premium 0.08 (0.4%). Original rate 18.1 fixed band E 1 payment made 59 to go. I'm I correct is saying the sale price is made up of £20.00 (original cost) + 0.08(premiam) + 0.07 interest to date? But why has buyer interest rate dropped by 0.2% after only 1 payment? Reason why l would not buy this loan part. lts very close to paying its 2 repayment, which is where l would be looking to sell off a E loan part. Do you really want to hold this high risk loan for the full term ?. In my view one of the best places for a newbie to start looking for SME loan parts in the SM. Is to look for loans that have made 21 or more repayments and that are selling at par. Then see if any take your interest enough to buy them. For nearly new loan parts its always best to just buy them new on the PM whenever you can.
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on Jan 2, 2016 17:33:02 GMT
Reason why l would not buy this loan part. lts very close to paying its 2 repayment, which is where l would be looking to sell off a E loan part. Do you really want to hold this high risk loan for the full term ?. In my view one of the best places for a newbie to start looking for SME loan parts in the SM. Is to look for loans that have made 21 or more repayments and that are selling at par. Then see if any take your interest enough to buy them. For nearly new loan parts its always best to just buy them new on the PM whenever you can. The oft-shared assumption that E band loans are unsafe to hold even to their 2nd payment really isn't supported by data. I currently hold 81 different E band loans and have already sold out of 15 others as they approached 6 months (this being my standard trigger to sell). Of these 96 loans, 2 currently are RBR; one of these looks likely to be defaulted in due course (it entered insolvency after 2 payments) whilst the other reckons it will clear a large CCJ within weeks. I recall there were 2 or 3 others that went Late with a payment at some stage, prompting me to sell the moment I could, so I accept these may also have had later problems. Not sure I agree that " For nearly new loan parts its always best to just buy them new on the PM whenever you can" either. I've picked up a lot of Es and Ds in the last couple of months via the SM that I've missed on the PM, generally only a week or two old and at 0.3% / 0.4% premium. When I factor in the typical 5 - 10 days hiatus for a PM loan to be accepted, and the fact that maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of E loans ultimately are declined by the borrower, I reckon I'm no worse off paying 0.4% for instant investment in a loan paying almost 1.5% per month.
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 2, 2016 18:05:35 GMT
Reason why l would not buy this loan part. lts very close to paying its 2 repayment, which is where l would be looking to sell off a E loan part. Do you really want to hold this high risk loan for the full term ?. In my view one of the best places for a newbie to start looking for SME loan parts in the SM. Is to look for loans that have made 21 or more repayments and that are selling at par. Then see if any take your interest enough to buy them. For nearly new loan parts its always best to just buy them new on the PM whenever you can. The oft-shared assumption that E band loans are unsafe to hold even to their 2nd payment really isn't supported by data. I currently hold 81 different E band loans and have already sold out of 15 others as they approached 6 months (this being my standard trigger to sell). Of these 96 loans, 2 currently are RBR; one of these looks likely to be defaulted in due course (it entered insolvency after 2 payments) whilst the other reckons it will clear a large CCJ within weeks. I recall there were 2 or 3 others that went Late with a payment at some stage, prompting me to sell the moment I could, so I accept these may also have had later problems. Not sure I agree that " For nearly new loan parts its always best to just buy them new on the PM whenever you can" either. I've picked up a lot of Es and Ds in the last couple of months via the SM that I've missed on the PM, generally only a week or two old and at 0.3% / 0.4% premium. When I factor in the typical 5 - 10 days hiatus for a PM loan to be accepted, and the fact that maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of E loans ultimately are declined by the borrower, I reckon I'm no worse off paying 0.4% for instant investment in a loan paying almost 1.5% per month. Hi With E band loans l would rather error on the side of caution. Because l know to hit my target returns of 11.5%-12.5% they are lower risk routes for me to go down. Yes if you can buy the loans parts on low premiums well before the first repayment, then it maybe worthwhile. But to wait until its near its 2 repayment would be a bit to late in the day for me.
|
|