|
|
19665
Feb 1, 2016 11:54:50 GMT
Post by captainconfident on Feb 1, 2016 11:54:50 GMT
This is rated B! What is it that I'm missing in these figures and ratings which might back that up?
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
19665
Feb 1, 2016 12:09:22 GMT
Post by blender on Feb 1, 2016 12:09:22 GMT
They may not take it because they expected to be A+ like everyone else.
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397 
Likes: 497
|
19665
Feb 1, 2016 12:09:23 GMT
Post by happy on Feb 1, 2016 12:09:23 GMT
Definate mistake, looks much more like it should be an A+ loan to me  |
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
19665
Feb 1, 2016 13:29:12 GMT
Post by blender on Feb 1, 2016 13:29:12 GMT
19673 is similar - at least the grading is consistent.
|
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Feb 1, 2016 14:02:26 GMT
Perhaps the losses on Bs are getting a bit high so we need to add some more safe ones to the mix?
|
|
|
|
19665
Feb 1, 2016 16:55:54 GMT
Post by captainconfident on Feb 1, 2016 16:55:54 GMT
19673 is similar - at least the grading is consistent. E by gum, that's true. In the meantime the personal scrubbers in the title have been reauctioned as 19694.
|
|
am
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 601
|
19665
Feb 2, 2016 9:51:08 GMT
Post by am on Feb 2, 2016 9:51:08 GMT
19673 is similar - at least the grading is consistent. E by gum, that's true. In the meantime the personal scrubbers in the title have been reauctioned as 19694. They're now allegedly borrowing £20k to pay off loans of £80k. I'm guessing that the earlier loan (which had disappeared before I ever saw it) was for £100,000, but they changed their minds when the saw the interest rate, and FC have failed to rewrite the loan details for what is now a working capital loan.
|
|
