ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,330 
Likes: 11,549
|
Post by ilmoro on Mar 17, 2016 21:00:11 GMT
Looking at the (currently linked, 01 Feb?) valuation report, I see: MARKET VALUE – CONTIUING (sic) OFFICE USE Our opinion of the Market Value of the interest in the property subject to, and with the benefit of the various occupational interests, and on the special as sumption of continuing office use, is: £3,275,000 (Seven million four hundred and fifty thousand pounds) Since when does 3275 read as 7450 ?? Moi? Dyslexic?? Maybe (youve spelt me wrong  ) Spotted by someone in the other thread. Its ok at the bottom of the report. Maybe thats the c20% reduction we're all looking for 
|
|
brin
I am trying to stay calm.
Posts: 379
Likes: 69
|
Post by brin on Mar 17, 2016 21:02:44 GMT
in fairness.. if you add the first figure £4,200,000 and the second figure £3,275,000 it does nearly come to (Seven million four hundred and fifty thousand pounds) its only £25K out, come on give em a break. and the floor area is 476.41 + 476.41 + 476.41 = 1,429.22 (actually its 1,429.23) bit pedantic i know, but a calc is a calc  |
|
cooling_dude
Bye Bye's for the PPI
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 4,298
|
Post by cooling_dude on Mar 17, 2016 21:33:50 GMT
in fairness.. if you add the first figure £4,200,000 and the second figure £3,275,000 it does nearly come to (Seven million four hundred and fifty thousand pounds) its only £25K out, come on give em a break. and the floor area is 476.41 + 476.41 + 476.41 = 1,429.22 (actually its 1,429.23) bit pedantic i know, but a calc is a calc If you're going to pick up on a 0.01 error in the valuation report, I think you're going to be very busy on these forum's when valuation reports are submited
|
|
brin
I am trying to stay calm.
Posts: 379
Likes: 69
|
Post by brin on Mar 17, 2016 21:41:07 GMT
in fairness.. if you add the first figure £4,200,000 and the second figure £3,275,000 it does nearly come to (Seven million four hundred and fifty thousand pounds) its only £25K out, come on give em a break. and the floor area is 476.41 + 476.41 + 476.41 = 1,429.22 (actually its 1,429.23) bit pedantic i know, but a calc is a calc If you're going to pick up on a 0.01 error in the valuation report, I think you're going to be very busy on these forum's when valuation reports are submited fully agree, but there are some measurements taken in a mans life where a 0.01 error is very important.
|
|
cooling_dude
Bye Bye's for the PPI
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 4,298
|
Post by cooling_dude on Mar 18, 2016 11:53:31 GMT
savingstream I know you're going to be busy today; but when you have time can you upload the updated valuation for unit 4, please......pretty please......Edit : Turns out I had to eat some cookies......
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,330
Likes: 11,549
|
Post by ilmoro on Mar 18, 2016 12:17:09 GMT
savingstream I know you're going to be busy today; but when you have time can you upload the updated valuation for unit 4, please...... pretty please...... Thought they had, its identical to the draft except there is now reference to the RCs in the assumptions. Clearly, there was either a previous valuation for c£10.5m/£6m we havent seen, or the valuers statement doesnt mean what we are interpreting it to mean. What hasnt changed is the valuation of the property in its current state, so the question is whether you are willing to lend on that basis, with a potential strong hope value increase after RC removal, full planning.
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,019
Likes: 5,147
|
Post by adrianc on Mar 18, 2016 12:31:06 GMT
savingstream I know you're going to be busy today; but when you have time can you upload the updated valuation for unit 4, please...... pretty please...... They've said in t'other thread that the live valuations are the current, correct ones.
|
|
cooling_dude
Bye Bye's for the PPI
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 4,298
|
Post by cooling_dude on Mar 18, 2016 12:31:22 GMT
savingstream I know you're going to be busy today; but when you have time can you upload the updated valuation for unit 4, please...... pretty please...... Thought they had, its identical to the draft except there is now reference to the RCs in the assumptions. Clearly, there was either a previous valuation for c£10.5m/£6m we havent seen, or the valuers statement doesnt mean what we are interpreting it to mean. What hasnt changed is the valuation of the property in its current state, so the question is whether you are willing to lend on that basis, with a potential strong hope value increase after RC removal, full planning.  The only valuation for unit 4 that I can see is the same "draft" one that has been there for a month with no mention of the RC..... Am I missing something?
|
|
sl75
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 1,245
|
Post by sl75 on Mar 18, 2016 12:42:24 GMT
The only valuation for unit 4 that I can see is the same "draft" one that has been there for a month with no mention of the RC..... Am I missing something? Perhaps your web browser has a cached copy of the old version (the new one for PBL088 would necessarily be on the same URL (or "filename") due to the way those URLs are constructed). The current document shows a 16 March 2016 date at the top of every page.
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,330
Likes: 11,549
|
Post by ilmoro on Mar 18, 2016 12:47:04 GMT
Thought they had, its identical to the draft except there is now reference to the RCs in the assumptions. Clearly, there was either a previous valuation for c£10.5m/£6m we havent seen, or the valuers statement doesnt mean what we are interpreting it to mean. What hasnt changed is the valuation of the property in its current state, so the question is whether you are willing to lend on that basis, with a potential strong hope value increase after RC removal, full planning. The only valuation for unit 4 that I can see is the same "draft" one that has been there for a month with no mention of the RC..... Am I missing something? Might need to clear your cache. Both valuations I have access to dont have draft stamped across them and have the date of the valuation on the first page. There was an issue with Unit 3 that was still showing the draft version without reference to the RC but SS fixed that yesterday afternoon by redoing the page (now loan IP 190 not 178) Otherwise the two valuations appear identical to the draft ones.
|
|
cooling_dude
Bye Bye's for the PPI
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 4,298
|
Post by cooling_dude on Mar 18, 2016 12:49:05 GMT
Yep Eaten some cookies and sure enough, there it is...... Apologies to SS |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2016 14:29:31 GMT
What time do we go live with 87 and 88 ? - is it definitely today ?
Edit : Re-read email - N.B. We reserve the right to cancel or extend this go live date if required.
|
|
cooling_dude
Bye Bye's for the PPI
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 4,298
|
Post by cooling_dude on Mar 18, 2016 14:30:39 GMT
What time do we go live with 87 and 88 ? - is it definitely today ? E-mail said it would be today. No idea what time, but the previous DFLs went live at around 4ish, so plenty of time
|
|
locutus
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 1,622
|
Post by locutus on Mar 18, 2016 14:35:58 GMT
Are we taking bets on prefund levels? I predict people will get 100% of PBL087 and 62% of PBL088
|
|
cooling_dude
Bye Bye's for the PPI
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 4,298
|
Post by cooling_dude on Mar 18, 2016 14:37:51 GMT
Are we taking bets on prefund levels? I predict people will get 100% of PBL087 and 62% of PBL088Definitely 100% on PBL087. I'm guessing between 80-90% on PBL088, but would not be surprised to see it closer to 100%.
|
|
) Spotted by someone in the other thread. Its ok at the bottom of the report. Maybe thats the c20% reduction we're all looking for
