|
Post by chris on Nov 7, 2013 18:09:38 GMT
Andrew I hope I'm not speaking out of turn here.
As part of the Assetz team I'm really happy that we've been able to step in and help create an independent site for users of all platforms. Whilst we will no doubt end up creating our own forum within the site, as there will be discussion that has it's place there, I do feel very strongly that there should be an independent community where the industry as a whole can be discussed and scrutinised. After all we will learn much from open debate helping us realise where our own views may need to change, we're never going to get everything right first time and without that scrutiny and challenge there would always be a chance we would remain stuck with poor decisions.
If all this is going to come to pass then there is a very real need for us to be planning to hand over day to day control of this forum to a group of people with no direct interest in any of the platforms, and it would be great to start a discussion around the best way to achieve this. I know a couple of discussions are taking place behind the scenes with select individuals who had previously been active on the last independent forum, and I'm sure that whatever is decided now will be very different from how the site is run in several years time. That said I would be really interested in the communities thoughts as to how we should go about making sure that all platforms that want to be involved can do so, whilst enabling the creation of a genuinely independent forum that is truly run and moderated by the community itself.
|
|
|
Post by mrclondon on Nov 8, 2013 0:32:47 GMT
I think you are right when you say the approach will change over time.There is an immediate issue of sorting out the moderation of the forum and a longer term issue of how best to structure things to allow funding from interested platforms but without day to day control over the moderation decisions.
I think the answer to the immediate issue of moderation (and particularly the prompt killing of spam posts and associated accounts ) can be found by looking at the how the zopa forum is moderated. A small team of volunteers (I think its 5 or 6) are responsible for moderating the forum. There is a very short sticky of forum rules, and moderation is against that. Perhaps the zopa moderator would like to comment on how it works in practise ...
I've already volunteered to assist with moderation, but I think to work effectively it has to be on the basis of each moderator chipping in to deal with flagged posts and routine content moderation on an "as and when basis" and not on a fixed rota as I suspect I'm not the only one whose schedule varies wildly from day to day and week to week.
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Nov 8, 2013 14:33:26 GMT
<delurk>
The workload varies - the reported posts are flagged up to us and most spammers are dealt with by the current version of the board software, but there's a bit of manual work to do. I guess this board will be somewhat busier than the Zopa forums so the workload will be higher, but split across a number of moderators that shouldn't be an issue I'd have thought. I'm not familiar with ProBoards, but a quick look round the help files shows it seems to be very configurable.
|
|