pom
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 1,244
|
Post by pom on May 12, 2016 11:25:23 GMT
Do you count PM as being just another platform alongside your p2p investments....or as BTL?
Because I discovered them via this forum I've so far been treating them as another platform, and setting myself similar rules as to what/how much to invest. But now I've just reached the limitis of what I'd previously decided I felt comfortable with in a single platform I'm wondering if I really should? Particularly as before I decided to start investing in p2p I was originally planning on investing a lot more than I actually have in BTL locally, before being put off by the local rates of return. So my current dilemma is do I continue to further increase my PM investments on the basis that whilst being significantly more diverse than a traditional BTL portfolio is actually really not very big at all.....or do I continue to allow platform risk to be the main deciding factor.
I'm quite sure I'll end up deciding something somewhere in between - not least as if I tried now to invest as much in BTL (PM) as I now have in P2P I'd run out of liquid cash - but would welcome any views!
|
|
ben
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 589
|
Post by ben on May 12, 2016 13:28:03 GMT
I do not class PM/PP as the same as the p2p. I look at it a bit more long term so look more at the rental yield rather then then amount of value they state it might increase by. I used to have a BTL and find this far easier with PM I am avereging at about 5% at moment, that includes one of two that have just be acquired so should go up to about 6% in next month or two which to me is probably more then would get in a BTL. With PP I am only avering around 3.5% so a lot less.
I now have a lot less in PP/PM then I had when had a BTL so will be looking to incresae that over time. Unless PP/PM are pretty poor landlords I expect to do better then would do with a BTL as a lot of the rental yields are higher then they would be in my area to.
|
|