jm72
Posts: 109
Likes: 2
|
Post by jm72 on Apr 2, 2014 9:15:18 GMT
Loan 1017, which was making payments but these were expected to extend significantly beyond the original payment term was defaulted a little while ago. One of the previous schedule repayments has just been made and distributed - but with higher fees taken off by FC than the 1% mgt fee that was previously taken. This is due to the T&Cs allowing FC to take 20% of the 'recovered' amount on a defaulted loan, but only 1% on non-defaulted loans. Is this the real reason for defaulting loans which are slowly making payments?
|
|
|
Post by davee39 on Apr 2, 2014 9:25:03 GMT
FC cannot win, can they? Criticised for not defaulting loans and then for defaulting. Allowing for the extra costs involved in chasing up defaults it is not surprising FC would want to increase their fees. Defaulting also allows them to pursue additional channels for recovery. I assume that in this case the loan is effectively several months in arrears despite payments being made.
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Apr 2, 2014 10:16:46 GMT
so how much have they taken off ? The full 20% allowed by the Ts and Cs ?
|
|