|
Post by goldservice on Jun 11, 2016 17:38:00 GMT
gsv, hoy - why object to <12% on current loans when SS are talking about future loans?
I guess SS want to grow the pipeline to meet lender demand. Secured property loans at around 10% would be competitive with for example Fairy Castles.
|
|
stevio
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 894
|
Post by stevio on Jun 11, 2016 17:58:14 GMT
Just checked and no email received yet. It wasn't a mass e-mail; it was in reply to an e-mail I sent this morning... Sorry, I would have to take this with a pinch of salt and need a definitive confirmation from SS themselves posting here (which unfortunately is very unlikely I know) Strangely though I got this in response to my query: Hi Stevio, I can confirm we are considering offering future loans in flying pigs. Kind regards, Customer Services Team Saving Stream
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,329
Likes: 11,549
|
Post by ilmoro on Jun 11, 2016 18:10:41 GMT
It wasn't a mass e-mail; it was in reply to an e-mail I sent this morning... Sorry, I would have to take this with a pinch of salt and need a definitive confirmation from SS themselves posting here (which unfortunately is very unlikely I know) Strangely though I got this in response to my query: Hi Stevio, I can confirm we are considering offering future loans in flying pigs. Kind regards, Customer Services Team Saving Stream They told me negotiations were confidential. A bigger secret than the ending of the new Harry Potter play. Loose lips ground pigs Never mind security looked a bit flighty
|
|
Liz
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 1,297
|
Post by Liz on Jun 11, 2016 18:16:55 GMT
I'm not sure variable rates would work with a provision fund. If I invest in low risk loans, then I don't want to pay for a PF, that higher risks loans are a lot more likely to use.
|
|
cooling_dude
Bye Bye's for the PPI
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 4,298
|
Post by cooling_dude on Jun 11, 2016 18:38:16 GMT
Sorry, I would have to take this with a pinch of salt and need a definitive confirmation from SS themselves posting here (which unfortunately is very unlikely I know) Strangely though I got this in response to my query They did say considering
It does seem like SS have taken a step back from participating from this forum, so all we have is the communication made via e-mail with users. BTW, I should of shared my actual question to put SS response into context... I was kind of hoping, that because I highlighted that the question had been raised on this forum, they may respond via a post on here, but just sent an e-mail instead.
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Jun 11, 2016 18:44:39 GMT
gsv, hoy - why object to <12% on current loans when SS are talking about future loans? I guess SS want to grow the pipeline to meet lender demand. Secured property loans at around 10% would be competitive with for example Fairy Castles. Because there was no indication of better quality, and the current set (not to mention toxic tips) are already stretching my credulity even at 12%.
|
|
|
Post by earthbound on Jun 11, 2016 18:57:11 GMT
well well well, discussed elsewhere and here this morning, 10 or 11% and a more sustainable PF.. yes please.. otherwise.. not sure... come on england.. bugger. Oh well, bring on the welsh.... Kudos to chris @ AC... well predicted.. forum.p2pmoney.co.uk/post/120369/thread
|
|
andyb
Posts: 69
Likes: 36
|
Post by andyb on Jun 11, 2016 19:03:24 GMT
I would be happy with one lower option and one higher so maybe 10%, 12% and 14% depending on LTV and other factors.
|
|
agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,043
Likes: 4,437
|
Post by agent69 on Jun 11, 2016 19:03:56 GMT
Given the amount of cash sloshing around the system they could probably shift the current pipeline at 10%.
Why pay 12% if you can get away with less?
|
|
ben
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 589
|
Post by ben on Jun 11, 2016 19:07:35 GMT
I be happy with lower % on better offferings but I bet it be similar offerings on about 9/10% and even worse offerings at 12% then have now.
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Jun 11, 2016 19:46:54 GMT
They told me negotiations were confidential. A bigger secret than the ending of the new Harry Potter play. They might have told you it was confidential, but then proceeded to put your details on the front page of their website....
|
|
|
Post by earthbound on Jun 11, 2016 22:34:37 GMT
They told me negotiations were confidential. A bigger secret than the ending of the new Harry Potter play. They might have told you it was confidential, but then proceeded to put your details on the front page of their website.... Support the uk economy by any chance?
|
|
spyrogyra
Member of DD Central
Posts: 386
Likes: 148
|
Post by spyrogyra on Jun 11, 2016 22:52:36 GMT
I don't want to say it - but lately I ask myself: Is Saving stream going to fall a victim of their own success? Let's hope not, we all wish they won't.
|
|
|
Post by harvey on Jun 11, 2016 22:56:25 GMT
I would much rather have a sound loan with a low LTV and a reliable real-world valuation at 10% than a dodgy looking loan at 12%.
In my opinion in an attempt to boost business and the number of loans, saving stream are putting forward more higher risk loans than they used to and that doesn't appeal to me very much.
You don't need many high risk loans to go bad to destroy the whole thing.
On money thing they have some loans at 10% and I invested in a couple only last week because the security looked good and the LTV was quite low.
It is obvious that different loans have different risk attached to them depending on the circumstances and to me it seems only right that the rates paid to investors should be variable according to that. That way the people who like to gamble on high risk high return stuff can invest in what they want and the people who prefer lower return lower risk Investments are also catered for.
A very good point was made earlier about the provision fund. Clearly a provision fund is more likely to be called upon for high risk loans and I don't see a provision Fund would be appropriate if investors have the choice of selecting high risk high return or lower risk , lower return in the first place.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Jun 11, 2016 23:17:17 GMT
The 1% per month deal is attractive and simple, that's what drew me to SS. Plus the asset security of course.
|
|