|
Post by ladywhitenap on Jun 12, 2016 13:09:40 GMT
Having just had my National savings indexed linked certs mature from 5 years ago I find myself with a wodge of cash for possible P2P investment.
I'm already in SS, MT and ABL but it is still going to take a while to get £30k+ in on these platforms so I'm considering FS as a possible home.
From the perspective of someone who likes the general model of SS, MT etc how would you rate FS
I'm asking here as I know there are quite a few of you who are into both SS and MT.
TIA
LW
|
|
archie
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 1,861
|
Post by archie on Jun 12, 2016 13:24:13 GMT
Make sure you understand the tax implications of the SM on FS. Anything you buy from SM, you are liable for the whole interest tax liability.
All loans only pay interest on completion.
I've started to restrict investments to the pawn type loans and avoid the property.
It's quite easy to get invested.
I joined FS, SS and MT all at the same time. MT has had most investment, then FS, then SS (partly down to the Captcha). I'd rate MT over the other two.
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on Jun 12, 2016 13:24:15 GMT
I like FS (despite having 4 or 5 loans in various "awaiting overdue repayment" states), but it operates rather differently to SS and MT so you need to get your head around it:
a) You don't start earning interest in a new loan until it activates or until FS name a date from which it will start accruing. For small pawn loans, they fill quickly and generally activate within a day or two. But there have been some significant delays in activating some larger property loans so, these days, many lenders are holding off committing funds to property loans until FS confirm an accrual start date.
b) Interest is only paid at the end of the loan (when it "completes"), either by the loan being repaid or renewed.
c) There is a wide variety of loan quality (IMHO), and rates offered often reflect liquidity as well as risk. 12% is "standard" usually but loans are offered at both higher and lower rates, not always for obvious reasons. Read the valuations carefully and make sure you're comfortable, rather than blindly pitching in.
d) The SM is very different from the others and triggers Marmite-like reactions; there are long threads on the FS board discussing the pros and cons but I'd suggest start by reading FS's own explanatory notes page.
e) In recent weeks, supply of larger property loans have exceeded lenders' capacity to fill them, leading to bonus rates and cashbacks being added. However I doubt this will be sustained for long (especially when other platforms are back in famine mode)
|
|
Steerpike
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 1,687
|
Post by Steerpike on Jun 12, 2016 16:29:24 GMT
I have a couple of property loans past the original end date with a few more due in the next two weeks and I have stopped investing in property until I see how this batch of maturing loans is handled, but I am still investing in other types of loan.
|
|
ben
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 589
|
Post by ben on Jun 12, 2016 16:33:39 GMT
I have a couple of property loans past the original end date with a few more due in the next two weeks and I have stopped investing in property until I see how this batch of maturing loans is handled, but I am still investing in other types of loan. Same I like the pawn items stilll, investing in a few property not many. I doubt the loans are any worse then the offering on SS the only problem is it is unclear if FS take anything upfront or not.
|
|
littleoldlady
Member of DD Central
Running down all platforms due to age
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1,862
|
Post by littleoldlady on Jun 12, 2016 16:41:25 GMT
I am running down my investment in FS for several reasons but mostly because I am not convinced that their pawn model works on property. If you are a SH and stick to pawn they are OK, but if you prefer property or if you want to lend a bit more than pawn allows I would advise sticking to SS and MT. Or you could wait and see how FS and SS compare on default recovery since they both have one on property loans at present.
|
|
|
Post by earthbound on Jun 13, 2016 10:26:39 GMT
I am running down my investment in FS for several reasons but mostly because I am not convinced that their pawn model works on property. If you are a SH and stick to pawn they are OK, but if you prefer property or if you want to lend a bit more than pawn allows I would advise sticking to SS and MT. Or you could wait and see how FS and SS compare on default recovery since they both have one on property loans at present. My sentiment exactly.
|
|