|
Post by ablrateandy on Jul 8, 2016 17:07:30 GMT
Focusssed on maturity mismatches it seems.
"The UK’s financial watchdog is probing the £2.7bn crowdfunding sector for the second time in two years, following widespread calls for tougher regulation of so-called “alternative finance” providers. On Friday, the Financial Conduct Authority said it would scrutinise the burgeoning sector to find out if consumers who lend and invest money on peer-to-peer and similar crowdfunding platforms understood the risks they were taking — especially as the industry attracts more “retail investors who are less experienced or knowledgeable”. According to the regulator, one of the systemic risks posed by P2P platforms is a “maturity mismatch”: between the three-to-five-year terms of the loans people make, and the promise to return their cash within 30 days if needed. It was possible that platforms could “only repay investors if they have money of their own available”, the FCA warned, adding this “might also transfer risk from investors who leave platforms to those that stay on”. P2P lending and crowdfunding became subject to FCA regulation in 2014 and Friday’s announcement — of a post-implementation review of the rules — follows growing political pressure for more scrutiny. Last month Andrew Tyrie, the chairman of parliament’s Treasury Committee, wrote to the FCA to warn that “poorly informed investors may be left with a false sense of security about the balance of risks versus returns”.
|
|
locutus
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 1,622
|
Post by locutus on Jul 8, 2016 17:13:04 GMT
<snip> According to the regulator, one of the systemic risks posed by P2P platforms is a “maturity mismatch”: between the three-to-five-year terms of the loans people make, and the promise to return their cash within 30 days if needed. <snip> I'm only aware of RS that do this. Do any other platforms do similar?
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on Jul 8, 2016 17:26:42 GMT
<snip> According to the regulator, one of the systemic risks posed by P2P platforms is a “maturity mismatch”: between the three-to-five-year terms of the loans people make, and the promise to return their cash within 30 days if needed. <snip> I'm only aware of RS that do this. Do any other platforms do similar? AC's QAA account operates on that basis, although it holds 30-50% in cash. However, if a run on withdrawals quickly drained that cash then those left in it presumably would be reliant on the underlying QAA loan holdings to be sold on to other lenders.
|
|
jjc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 414
Likes: 632
|
Post by jjc on Jul 8, 2016 23:41:59 GMT
Interesting, thanks. Quite a few aspects they’re looking at. Why do you say “It's about time the FCA admitted this was a concern in public and not just in private” – it seems the document is there to invite feedback (also from firms competing with P2P operators - p6).
Wonder what this review means in terms of full authorisation/IFISA timings. Sep 8th reply deadline plus couple or more months to analyse, & in particular perhaps a further consultation (p13) suggests this financial year might now be a squeeze, in which case Autumn 17 could conceivably become the new target window?
Whatever the case to my untrained eye on FCA matters it looks like the jury is still out, too early to pick the winners & who knows maybe surprises in store for a number of platforms before full authorisation badges get handed out. Not so good news for shareholders maybe, but not so bad for lenders.
|
|
jjc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 414
Likes: 632
|
Post by jjc on Jul 10, 2016 14:21:09 GMT
Thanks samford71. Reading the text of the review, not to mention between the lines, your points sound eminently plausible.
|
|
|
Post by lb on Jul 11, 2016 9:53:50 GMT
Every single P2P platform that offers SM is effectively offering maturity transformation. Any instant access/30 day accounts are merely offering an SM in a different manner.
Seems that the FCA quite rightly want it to be very explicit to retail investors that QAA does not guarantee quick access - similarly RS rolling, Zopa access, Landbay tracker etc.
However, how exactly can the FCA regulate how quickly a Platform can sell your loans to another investor? By ruling that platforms are not allowed to offer instant sales of loan parts?
Banks et al need to stop lobbying a lost cause ...
|
|
duck
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 6,974
|
Post by duck on Jul 21, 2016 4:43:39 GMT
Whilst this doesn't come as much of a surprise, do I spot a mismatch?
At the start of the month the BoE 'stimulated' the banking sector (£150bn for personal/business lending) by relaxing regulatory requirements. More QE is expected next month.
A case of 'low hanging fruit'?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2016 6:43:02 GMT
I may or may not be a sophisticated investor but I struggle to understand the english of some of these guys. My best understanding is
"There could be a run on the P2P industry. Head for the hills!"
Have I got this right?
|
|
|
Post by propman on Jul 21, 2016 8:08:42 GMT
I may or may not be a sophisticated investor but I struggle to understand the english of some of these guys. My best understanding is "There could be a run on the P2P industry. Head for the hills!" Have I got this right? As I see it, neither the consultation or these comments are a warning beyond the assumption that P2P is similar to an investment account. The bigger question is whether it will ever be possible to make P2P a mass market product suitable for a high proportion of those with long term savings. If people in 80's couldn't see that an endowment included investment risk, how are they going to be shown that P2P entails risks and the possible consequences?
- PM
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 1,546
|
Post by pikestaff on Aug 5, 2016 6:26:20 GMT
|
|