|
Post by valueinvestor123 on Nov 21, 2016 11:12:12 GMT
I can't predict 2017 or any future year, so I will stick to the asset allocation I have faith in, knowing I'm likely to fair better with a good mix . If you're not already familiar with it, it's well worth doing some reading about the Shiller ten year cyclically adjusted price/earnings ratio (PE10). Predicting Stock Market Returns Using the Shiller CAPE: page 10 has a handy table showing the relationship for many markets and page 11 a useful graph. As a result of its apparent reliability it's been used in studies of how to reduce the effect of sequence of return risk in pension drawdown and improve the maximum safe withdrawal rate, while generally improving returns overall, with some useful reading on those subjects including: Jonathan Guyton Tames a GorillaSequence-of-Return Risk: Gorilla or Boogeyman?Dynamic Asset Allocation and Safe Withdrawal Rates
Historically I've been more than 90% invested in equities but given the level of PE10 in the major markets I've greatly reduced that in favour of P2P, in part because I can anticipate higher than average equity returns from P2P so it's not even a major cost to do it. I still have quite a bit in a Vanguard fund but quite a bit is way less than usual and I like them overall for beginners who won't pay much attention. But I don't want to see people stay beginners when some fairly simple changes to investment mixtures can improve likely results. Long term mixtures of investments are a good thing but that's not a sufficient reason to be highly weighted in areas where there is good reason to believe that now is a bad time to be buying. For those considering switching out of P2P this implies that now is not the best of times to be doing it into high equity mixtures. Of course I'm going in the opposite direction because I do believe the studies. Schiller PE is tough to use for short to medium-term predictions (less than 10 years and it doesn't work at all for less than 5 years) but it does seem to work in the long term. It is also confusing since the US market appears to be somewhat overvalued while the UK market is under valued and expected returns are projected to be 13.3% from here onwards from UK equities. But since UK usually follows the US in any downturn, this data may be useless. Moreover, the last leg of the cycle also tends to be the steepest (historically) and missing out on this may be detrimental for long term performance of portfolio. I also don't particularly see valuations as stretched when I look at individual equities or sectors (some sectors appear to be undervalued to me). For the medium term, I am much less sanguine about the peer2peer returns going forward. It's just that many of the signs are there that we may be in a bubble: every grandma and their cat are investing in it and there is a somewhat heightened degree of complacency. The yields are getting too low (platforms now offering 3-4% returns for peer2peer investments whereas it should be double digits). Some platforms obfuscate and confuse investors with complex products that mask risks and also appear somewhat deluded and over-reliant on their data on defaults. Frankly, I am trying to find an excuse to stay invested but I wouldn't advocate more than 5-10% of portfolio in this sector at this point (currently breaking my own advice! but I am gradually withdrawing). I am trying to think what could tip this but can't really come up with anything (which is also typical because risk repricing usually occurs unexpectedly, when the majority have it wrong. Anything that can be foreseen currently, will be priced into the yields. I know it sounds stupid.) Interest rates rise? High inflation? Commercial property collapse? No idea.
|
|
Monetus
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 2,961
|
Post by Monetus on Nov 21, 2016 11:30:26 GMT
Interesting to see quite a few are heading for the exits....
I am still bullish on the prospects of P2P given uncertainly in other financial markets, increased industry regulation and the asset-backed nature of the platforms that I currently invest in.
I will be increasing my holding but focusing on adequate diversification for the next 2-3 years.
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on Nov 21, 2016 12:22:24 GMT
It's just that many of the signs are there that we may be in a bubble: every grandma and their cat are investing in it and there is a somewhat heightened degree of complacency. The yields are getting too low (platforms now offering 3-4% returns for peer2peer investments whereas it should be double digits) Looking at the four "double digit" platforms I lend with, SS typically have 2000 active lenders per loan, MT perhaps 1000, FS and ABL in the hundreds. Versus a UK population of 50 million or so adults, I don't think ALL grandmas and cats have yet climbed on board these ones (although the avatars here show they ARE represented!). What worries me more than these double digit asset-secured platforms are others that now churn out unsecured SME loans at 6/7/8%, and those who used to offer decent double digit secured lending but now find themselves able to fill much the same loans at 8 or 9%. There's a standard life cycle for P2P platforms and I only remain involved until the point they get greedy and go "mass market"
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Nov 21, 2016 14:14:58 GMT
At MoneyThing you might also find some of the property development loans offered by Broadoak in the BPFnnn series of interest. A distinguishing feature of these is that Broadoak has a 5% first loss exposure, providing a layer of protection to lenders if the security value turns out to be insufficient. Even more interesting for those who want reduced risk is the loans like BPF537/BPF536 where the 537 part pays 13% and the 536 part 10%. Those in the 537 part take losses if the security value is insufficient before those in the 536 part take losses. Described in more detail here. One of those is going live on Tuesday. BPF588 10% and BPF589 13% taking second loss after Broadoak. Bid limits of £500 and £250 respectively for the first 24 hours from 4PM start. Bid early if the 13% interests you, I doubt it'll last as long as an hour. The lower risk 10% part should last a few hours at least but don't dally unnecessarily.
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Nov 21, 2016 14:37:50 GMT
Schiller PE is tough to use for short to medium-term predictions (less than 10 years and it doesn't work at all for less than 5 years) but it does seem to work in the long term. The places I linked to found positive results from using it over shorter periods than that though it certainly isn't a short term tool, meaning say under a year, and it's just probabilities not saying when things will happen, as illustrated on page 21. So while I can join others in saying expected returns are lower now, that still doesn't mean that say the S&P 500 can't double in price first! It can and might well do that. It's just not the way the odds point at the moment. The pension-side aspects are in part about reducing the sequence of returns risk at the start of retirement when drops are particularly important and the fairly simple rules used by Guyton did that and improved results with short term decision making once a year. the last leg of the cycle also tends to be the steepest (historically) and missing out on this may be detrimental for long term performance of portfolio. Yes, that's pretty common. The catch is how to get out before the drop happens while taking the gain. Stop loss orders and ETFs would be one potential way for those with a fairly short term view to try it. Plenty of other ways. For the medium term, I am much less sanguine about the peer2peer returns going forward. It's just that many of the signs are there that we may be in a bubble I think that SteveT perhaps has it better and to some extent it's about the life cycle of a platform. Yet while I don't think P2P as a whole is in a bubble, I do think that over perhaps 5-10 years the potential gains will end up lower overall. At least, that's my expectation. Won't stop me exploiting the opportunities while they seem to be around, though. Yet today, P2P offers an almost cost-free way to get out of high equity weightings. Returns from the higher paying platforms are likely to be higher than the long term averages for both the UK and US markets, IMO, meaning 5-6% plus inflation for those two. So it's currently looking like a really good risk reduction tool. Will it be as viable in say five years? ten? Less prospect of that IMO. And if we do see big equity market drops I'll undoubtedly be switching back into equities after the drops: I'm after avoiding being in the market for those while not paying a large return penalty, not long term having low equity weights. So while lots of people are piling in and afraid of equities I'l be doing what I did back in 2008 and early 2009 and going heavily into them again. (shrug) At least it should make for good liquidity for the money I'll be removing from P2P. I am trying to find an excuse to stay invested but I wouldn't advocate more than 5-10% of portfolio in this sector at this point (currently breaking my own advice! but I am gradually withdrawing). I am trying to think what could tip this but can't really come up with anything (which is also typical because risk repricing usually occurs unexpectedly, when the majority have it wrong. Anything that can be foreseen currently, will be priced into the yields. I know it sounds stupid.) Interest rates rise? High inflation? Commercial property collapse? No idea. Well, not so sure you need an excuse to stay in, but may need no excuse to change weighting between different platforms. I've effectively abandoned a couple (Zopa low returns and Bondora not seeming trustworthy or reliable and reduced returns) and eliminated another during diligence (Saving Stream, didn't seem trustworthy enough to me). I'm still looking to head to around 75% - a few hundred thousand - in P2P but looks as though for a while I'll be inhibited by not being able to do it directly with pension money and might be stuck around 150k. The joys of a 60% plus savings ratio and nice income...
|
|
Liz
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 1,297
|
Post by Liz on Nov 21, 2016 15:48:24 GMT
james thanks for sharing your thoughts with us. You mention 3 platforms you are "out" of, so which platforms are you using? Thanks
|
|
stevio
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 894
|
Post by stevio on Nov 21, 2016 16:29:11 GMT
Where P2P can offer tax exempt gains is in capital gains from selling loans on platforms where the original loan issuance or secondary market is of simple debts. Capital gains on simple debts are exempt from CGT. Others may just do little enough gaining to stay within their CGT allowance. Could you kindly expand on the CGT points you mention? Are there specific platforms?
|
|
stevio
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 894
|
Post by stevio on Nov 21, 2016 16:36:46 GMT
MoneyThing: the AEnnn care hire purchase loans. These are lending to a firm that does car hire purchase to low credit rating people. The cars all have built in trackers. The security is both a 50% LTV on the hire purchase payments by the car buyers and an 80% LTV on the car values. While the borrowing HP firm is still trading, any defaulting HP buyers are swapped out at no explicit cost to lenders. When a HP purchase completes a replacement car is added to the package. The loan terms are six month renewable so you have regular end of term exits if the secondary market quietens down. Since the HP payments are from consumers and the cars are owned by the consumers most of the risk of the security vanishing just isn't there because the borrower doesn't have possession of the security.Is this the same with the similar AB loans?
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Nov 21, 2016 16:39:32 GMT
Could you kindly expand on the CGT points you mention? Are there specific platforms? See this post for a summary of those I know about. If there is a premium possible in secondary trades then either it'll be tax exempt gains, if simple debts, or using CGT allowance otherwise. Some other tax free or exempt things are listed here. If anyone has information on other platforms not currently listed in the first post I'll add them.
|
|
littonowl
Member of DD Central
Posts: 398
Likes: 355
|
Post by littonowl on Nov 21, 2016 16:53:53 GMT
Interesting to see quite a few are heading for the exits.... I am still bullish on the prospects of P2P given uncertainly in other financial markets, increased industry regulation and the asset-backed nature of the platforms that I currently invest in. I will be increasing my holding but focusing on adequate diversification for the next 2-3 years. I'm also still pretty bullish on P2P, certainly more so than equity mkts where most of my funds are currently, and where I'm no longer adding any new funds (in fact I've been actively selling since the late summer). I've also withdrawn most of the cash out of my savings accounts as rates have fallen, adding the proceeds to selected P2P platforms (MT, Coll, Abl etc), where I can get 10-12% returns, against asset-backed securities. The perception of P2P by most of the general public hardly seems to suggest a bubble either. Most IFA's still view P2P as too risky, and I received the typical response from someone at the weekend who was horrified to hear I was investing in loans returning 12%, yet the same person thinks nothing of holding funds in 'defensive' large cap / bond proxy stocks, with yields of just 2-3% and on PE's in the mid 20's!
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Nov 21, 2016 16:55:38 GMT
james thanks for sharing your thoughts with us. You mention 3 platforms you are "out" of, so which platforms are you using? Ablrate, MoneyThing still increasing, looking into selecting another one or two, currently reading up on Collateral because of the pawn loans there and their diversification value. Still have money in Zopa, not much, and Bondora, just running down those loan books naturally as loans end now, having done all of the Bondora selling I plan to do except, perhaps, for defaulted loans. Not P2P but I'm also adding to VCT as now usual for me to eliminate most of my income tax cost and making pension contributions this year that I expect to be more than 100% of my base pay, with non-base things meaning my employer is still paying me a bit over minimum wage. I'm not far from being able to take money out of pensions and my current plan is to do the 25% tax free lump sum about as soon as I can and put the money into P2P. Pensions are in part positive due to having unused annual allowance from three years ago to either use or lose and knowing that if I'm still working I'll end up limited to the pure annual allowance only in two years. The FCA recently decided that money that has ever been taken out of a pension will no longer count towards the high net worth capital requirement, with no end date given for it, so perhaps my whole life. Since I want to add that to the sophisticated investor (by investments) qualification that's a negative point for me and makes VCT investing somewhat interesting even beyond what I do now. But since I might relocate out of the UK and get all pension money out tax free the pension still wins for now. All tax free involves a place with a tax treaty with the UK that says income is taxed in country of tax residence and picking a place with low income tax rate, like the 0% Portugal scheme you can opt in to. the pension 75% is income so included in that. If you do this and aren't already out of the UK you'll need to stay out of the UK for five years or be taxed on it in the year of your return. I've already exceeded my base retirement income/pot target, I'm now working to accumulate funds to allow me to choose where to live via investor visas if I wan to do that. Target was median income (circa 18k originally) using modern drawdown rules with at least 95% confidence level on things like cfiresim and without income going below £12k even in sustained bad investment returns cases. I would have to anticipate sustained bad returns if I was to retire today, see the PE10 discussion for why. Except I'm "cheating" using P2P since this opportunity is there. But at any time I could just retire now if I wanted to. My non-work investment income is already close to the 18k level even without any pension money involved. Courtesy of some nice VCT dividends and P2P interest.
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Nov 21, 2016 17:00:20 GMT
Since the HP payments are from consumers and the cars are owned by the consumers most of the risk of the security vanishing just isn't there because the borrower doesn't have possession of the security.Is this the same with the similar AB loans? No Ablrate deal that has cars on HP comes to mind. Closest that come to my mind are the car dealer stocking loans and since they are stock they are in the possession of the dealers. If you think one does do HP please say which it is with enough specificity for me to identify it.
|
|
angrysaveruk
Member of DD Central
Say No To T.D.S
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 789
Member is Online
|
Post by angrysaveruk on Nov 21, 2016 17:45:43 GMT
The confidence in the security always depends on the specifics of the loan and its related package. Two generally interesting opportunities are quite often available at MoneyThing and Ablrate: MoneyThing: the AEnnn care hire purchase loans. These are lending to a firm that does car hire purchase to low credit rating people. The cars all have built in trackers. The security is both a 50% LTV on the hire purchase payments by the car buyers and an 80% LTV on the car values. While the borrowing HP firm is still trading, any defaulting HP buyers are swapped out at no explicit cost to lenders. When a HP purchase completes a replacement car is added to the package. The loan terms are six month renewable so you have regular end of term exits if the secondary market quietens down. Since the HP payments are from consumers and the cars are owned by the consumers most of the risk of the security vanishing just isn't there because the borrower doesn't have possession of the security. Ablrate: the ACF loans where ACF takes the credit risk so that if the borrower defaults, ACF makes investors whole, subject to ACF's own ability to pay. These deals need individual evaluation even so. The AE ones would be a good start and not being based on buildings they offer useful diversification. You can typically find at least some availability on the secondary market when other deals are coming up, though often there is nothing at all available, so it does take some persistence. At MoneyThing you might also find some of the property development loans offered by Broadoak in the BPFnnn series of interest. A distinguishing feature of these is that Broadoak has a 5% first loss exposure, providing a layer of protection to lenders if the security value turns out to be insufficient. Even more interesting for those who want reduced risk is the loans like BPF537/BPF536 where the 537 part pays 13% and the 536 part 10%. Those in the 537 part take losses if the security value is insufficient before those in the 536 part take losses. Described in more detail here. Thanks for the information and your opinion. When I first got into P2P I quite liked the idea of lending to businesses and doing something economically useful with my money and I looked at Funding Circle. After doing some research I concluded that unsecured loans to LTD companeis was just too risky so went down the Zopa/RateSetter personal loan route. I have certainly be able to earn a reasonable return on my savings this way without having to do any work, I will take a look at the loans you mentioned and think about putting some investment in. I dont mind lending to legitimate businesses, my main concern is fraudsters using assets that they dont own to secure further loans - has there been any examples of this happening?
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Nov 22, 2016 4:28:19 GMT
I dont mind lending to legitimate businesses, my main concern is fraudsters using assets that they dont own to secure further loans - has there been any examples of this happening? I don't know of a case exactly like that but do know of one that I can't say more about where it seems that a borrower deliberately chose to default and also sold some goods not yet transferred to them. I think that there will be good recovery in that one but it's not yet resolved. Sometimes you will encounter borrowers who act improperly, even criminally, or just become insolvent due to other factors. It's just routine in consumer credit P2P and some business owners will do it as well.
|
|
littleoldlady
Member of DD Central
Running down all platforms due to age
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1,862
|
Post by littleoldlady on Nov 22, 2016 8:07:28 GMT
I dont mind lending to legitimate businesses, my main concern is fraudsters using assets that they dont own to secure further loans - has there been any examples of this happening? I don't know of a case exactly like that but do know of one that I can't say more about where it seems that a borrower deliberately chose to default and also sold some goods not yet transferred to them. I think that there will be good recovery in that one but it's not yet resolved. Sometimes you will encounter borrowers who act improperly, even criminally, or just become insolvent due to other factors. It's just routine in consumer credit P2P and some business owners will do it as well. I know of one case exactly like that. There are other cases where the value of the asset has been overstated so that the loan exceeded the value, this is sometimes called "Sale by loan". There was one case where it seems to me that the loan never really existed and was just a way of raising working capital for the platform, but in that case the "loan" was repaid with interest so most lenders did not realise. Any situation in which the amount of money flowing in is greater that that flowing out is liable to morph into a Ponzi because the temptation is to maintain interest payments out of new money to keep the ball rolling. In short, p2p is not saving. It is at best investing and at worst gambling. Don't put it more than you can afford to lose without it becoming life changing.
|
|