mary
Member of DD Central
Posts: 698 
Likes: 711
|
Post by mary on Sept 26, 2019 18:05:02 GMT
I wonder how much the offer is for? The house, albeit a “unique” architectural example, which I’ve driven past, is in a great riverside location where the land alone is worth the value of the loan, so crossed fingers. However, the Marina has suffered from significant planning enforcement issues, so may be more problematic.
|
|
|
|
Post by gramsky on Oct 13, 2019 8:00:45 GMT
Last update stated "new offers had been received from a third party, and the Borrower" but article in Daily Mail today says it is for sale for a knock down price of £2.85m, but it has disappeared from Savills and Rightmove websites, so what is happening?:- www.dailymail.co.uk/news/<link redacted> |
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422 
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Jun 15, 2020 14:00:45 GMT
A number of judgments and a list of the borrowers litigation history for this year have been posted into DDC for those with access.
|
|
tony9239
Member of DD Central
Posts: 96
Likes: 197
|
Post by tony9239 on Jun 25, 2020 7:40:09 GMT
Sounds like just the sort of honest, upstanding borrower that LB would lend our money to... Also, this article says he's still living there, which is outrageous since we own it, not him. www.standard.co.uk/<redacted> |
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Jul 17, 2020 15:09:04 GMT
The borrower is scheduled for a 15 minute mention at The Crown Court at Kingston Upon Thames on Monday. I understand it's a criminal Fraud Case
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Aug 13, 2020 22:00:22 GMT
The borrower is appearing at Kingston Crown Court tomorrow for a "Plea and Trial Preparation" hearing.
I understand this indicates he will plead not guilty.
Next available date for a Criminal trial likely to be end of 2021/ during 2022.
|
|
ozboy
Member of DD Central
Mine's a Large One! (Snigger, snigger .......)
Posts: 2,998
Likes: 4,432
|
Post by ozboy on Aug 14, 2020 16:06:11 GMT
The borrower is appearing at Kingston Crown Court tomorrow for a "Plea and Trial Preparation" hearing.
I understand this indicates he will plead not guilty.
Next available date for a Criminal trial likely to be end of 2021/ during 2022.
Jesus, if he does, he's got MASSIVE cojones! Mind you, given the rumours, he probably likes showing them off. 
|
|
jonno
Member of DD Central
nil satis nisi optimum
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 2,935
|
Post by jonno on Aug 14, 2020 17:16:07 GMT
The borrower is appearing at Kingston Crown Court tomorrow for a "Plea and Trial Preparation" hearing.
I understand this indicates he will plead not guilty.
Next available date for a Criminal trial likely to be end of 2021/ during 2022.
Jesus, if he does, he's got MASSIVE cojones! Mind you, given the rumours, he probably likes showing them off. don't tell me!! Surely he's not the famous "Billy Big Bollocks" 
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Aug 14, 2020 22:00:37 GMT
Annnd back on Monday for a "Mention" for our borrower. His employee is also due "a Plea and Trial Preparation" at the same time so one assumes it wasn't done today.
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Sept 11, 2020 6:57:51 GMT
The borrower is appearing at Lavender Hill Magistrates Court this morning.
|
|
jonno
Member of DD Central
nil satis nisi optimum
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 2,935
|
Post by jonno on Sept 11, 2020 8:00:20 GMT
The borrower is appearing at Lavender Hill Magistrates Court this morning. Didn't realise he was a part of that "mob"
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 10,183
Likes: 10,302
|
Post by ilmoro on Sept 11, 2020 9:54:30 GMT
The borrower is appearing at Lavender Hill Magistrates Court this morning. Didn't realise he was a part of that "mob" Given the gentleman's propensity for more than one identity Kind Hearts & Coronets might be more apt if ironic title. 
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Sept 21, 2020 15:25:04 GMT
The Rolls Buildings, Court 21 Before MR JUSTICE ***** ***** Tuesday 22 September 2020 At 10:00 AM Appeals CH-2020-****** Borrower v Law Firm
|
|
ozboy
Member of DD Central
Mine's a Large One! (Snigger, snigger .......)
Posts: 2,998
Likes: 4,432
|
Post by ozboy on Sept 21, 2020 19:24:46 GMT
Ah, yes, THE loan, which, for me, introduced me to and highlighted the existence of The Great Valuations LTV ConScam. Of course, RICS Valuations are beyond reproach - they're calculated by Professionals! Professional at what, you be the judge.  |
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Sept 22, 2020 16:30:57 GMT
This was a hearing requesting permission to appeal a judgement made following a trial at the High Court in 2017.
The appellant is the Lendy borrower (“LB”) and the firm of solicitors that represented him in that trial are the respondents.
The previous case is best described by reference to the Judgement from that hearing:
The borrower “induced (some individuals) to buy the houseboats by representing that their purchases included long-term rights to moor the houseboats at (the site of the loan property) and lawfully to occupy them there as their permanent family homes.”
The judge in that matter found that in reality no such mooring rights existed.
LB lost that case, with the judge remarking he was “an unusual man, with a complex relationship with the truth” and that he “seemed to have a constant strategy for obfuscation, for turning the simple into the complicated and for constructing arguments and possibilities which seemed to have little relation to reality.”
Interesting words indeed.
I understand todays appeal seemed to centre around documents that were held in the possession of the respondents (ie the solicitors that acted for him in the previous case) but had not been submitted to the Court as evidence. Had they done so then it could have in the Judges words “lead to a different outcome”.
Reference was made to the solicitors as “having done a bad job” by today's judge but he added the particulars of claim for the appeal lacked specificity such that the appeal had to be refused.
An application for a civil restraining order was successful against LB and prevents him making further claims in relation this matter.
£5k costs were awarded to the respondent. The court heard that solicitor fees are still outstanding from the trial in 2017 and will be subject to a hearing this November.
|
|
