adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,787 
Likes: 3,910
|
Post by adrian77 on Sept 22, 2020 18:00:27 GMT
I like this judge and his use of language - in Burnley we would simply say "lying, thieving, stealing git!"
|
|
agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 4,940
Likes: 3,707
|
Post by agent69 on Sept 22, 2020 18:17:17 GMT
I like this judge and his use of language - in Burnley we would simply say " lying, thieving, stealing git!" Ideally suited as a P2P borrower then
|
|
11025
Member of DD Central
Posts: 701
Likes: 777
|
Post by 11025 on Sept 22, 2020 20:22:35 GMT
LB lost that case, with the judge remarking he was “an unusual man, with a complex relationship with the truth” and that he “seemed to have a constant strategy for obfuscation, for turning the simple into the complicated and for constructing arguments and possibilities which seemed to have little relation to reality I like this judge and his use of language - in Burnley we would simply say " lying, thieving, stealing git!" Ideally suited as a P2P borrower then Or running a P2P Platform.
|
|
|
|
Post by tinkerbell59 on Sept 25, 2020 9:02:00 GMT
This is hearing requesting permission to appeal a judgement made following a trial at the High Court in 2017. The appellant is the Lendy borrower (“LB”) and the firm of solicitors that represented him in that trial are the respondents. The previous case is best described by reference to the Judgement from that hearing: The borrower “induced (some individuals) to buy the houseboats by representing that their purchases included long-term rights to moor the houseboats at (the site of the loan property) and lawfully to occupy them there as their permanent family homes.)” The judge in that matter found that in reality no such mooring rights existed. LB lost that case, with the judge remarking he was “an unusual man, with a complex relationship with the truth” and that he “seemed to have a constant strategy for obfuscation, for turning the simple into the complicated and for constructing arguments and possibilities which seemed to have little relation to reality.” Interesting words indeed. I understand todays appeal seemed to centre around documents that were held in the possession of the respondents (ie the solicitors that acted for him in the previous case) but had not been submitted to the Court as evidence. Had they done so then it could have in the Judges words “lead to a different outcome”. Reference was made to the solicitors as “having done a bad job” by today's judge but he added the particulars of claim for the appeal lacked specificity such that the appeal had to be refused. An application for a civil restraining order was successful against LB and prevents him making further claims in relation this matter. £5k costs were awarded to the respondent. The court heard that solicitor fees are still outstanding from the trial in 2017 and will be subject to a hearing this November.
|
|
|
|
Post by tinkerbell59 on Sept 25, 2020 9:07:56 GMT
if the costs fo £5k were awarded to the respondent. (l. Brooke's solicitor) and the costs of the 2017 are subject to another hearing in November. who actually will pay the £5k? a raindrop in the ocean I know, but Liam Brooke has a few sandwiches short of a picnic when it comes to honesty and integrity
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Sept 25, 2020 11:01:46 GMT
if the costs fo £5k were awarded to the respondent. (l. Brooke's solicitor) and the costs of the 2017 are subject to another hearing in November. who actually will pay the £5k? a raindrop in the ocean I know, but Liam Brooke has a few sandwiches short of a picnic when it comes to honesty and integrity Ah just to confirm LB refers to the Lendy Borrower not Liam Brooke (who has no involvement with these proceedings)
The borrower asked for 60 days to pay the £5k citing financial difficulties caused by the covid downturn but the judge only allowed 14 days I recall.
Why judges makes orders that are intentionally designed to be impossible to comply with I don't know.
|
|
|
|
Post by tinkerbell59 on Sept 25, 2020 11:17:45 GMT
if the costs fo £5k were awarded to the respondent. (l. Brooke's solicitor) and the costs of the 2017 are subject to another hearing in November. who actually will pay the £5k? a raindrop in the ocean I know, but Liam Brooke has a few sandwiches short of a picnic when it comes to honesty and integrity Ah just to confirm LB refers to the Lendy Borrower not Liam Brooke (who has no involvement with these proceedings)
The borrower asked for 60 days to pay the £5k citing financial difficulties caused by the covid downturn but the judge only allowed 14 days I recall. Why judges makes orders that are intentionally designed to be impossible to comply with I don't know.
thank you for that!
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Oct 27, 2020 22:32:46 GMT
Annnd he's back at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court tomorrow.
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Dec 14, 2020 21:43:27 GMT
Annnd back at Kingston Crown Court tomorrow for a 20 minute 'mention'
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Jan 14, 2021 21:26:37 GMT
Annnd back at Kingston Crown Court tomorrow for a 15 minute 'Pre-Trial Review'
|
|
sussexlender
Member of DD Central
Cheat seeking missile
Posts: 550
Likes: 916
|
Post by sussexlender on Jan 19, 2021 11:21:22 GMT
Thank you, mousey, for continuing to give us information.
It is greatly appreciated by me and no doubt by many others.
SXLR
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 5,656
|
Post by Mousey on Feb 2, 2021 16:48:55 GMT
I understand from a news report dated 2/2/21 that the borrower was recently at Wimbledon Magistrates Court: It was reported the borrower threatened a houseboat tenant over £5.5k of unwarranted charges. In this photo (subtly redacted) he was alleged to have demonstrated "a somewhat unconventional use for the lead dresser, a tool commonly found in the roofing trade"
|
|
|
|
Post by billy169 on Feb 2, 2021 17:46:25 GMT
Lendy really did give our money to anyone.. underline give.
|
|
|
|
Post by rooster on Feb 4, 2021 21:03:04 GMT
Lendy really did give our money to anyone.. underline give. Well technically they sold it.... They sold our money for a fee.... A fee that they charged 
|
|
|
|
Post by billy169 on Feb 4, 2021 21:23:00 GMT
Yes.. I'd forgotten the business model.
Sell our money to anyone who'll pay a fee.
|
|
