jonah
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 1,113
|
Post by jonah on Feb 12, 2017 15:28:47 GMT
This is the poll for the platform which most let you down in 2016. It could be that they over promised and under delivered, or that they simply became worse in some way. This isn't intended to be a 'worst platform' poll, as I don't think that is sensible, but one which covers those platforms which tried and failed, or maybe simply didn't have the right focus or emphasis for you. This is one of a series of polls set up to cover the events of 2016. Each is open until the 25th of February. For more details see here. |
|
|
|
Post by jackpease on Feb 25, 2017 12:15:55 GMT
>>>This isn't intended to be a 'worst platform' poll, Absolutely! The 'winners' of this poll may look at FC and decide that promising little, having creative rates, saying nothing and shunning this board is the way to stay under the radar next year :-( Jack P
|
|
am
Posts: 1,495 
Likes: 601
|
Post by am on Feb 25, 2017 16:04:13 GMT
Could someone explain why PeerFunding got as many votes here as it did. I wouldn't have thought that it had been going long enough to have disappointed anyone, and I haven't noticed any particular dissatisfaction expressed here.
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 11,555
|
Post by ilmoro on Feb 25, 2017 16:32:10 GMT
Could someone explain why PeerFunding got as many votes here as it did. I wouldn't have thought that it had been going long enough to have disappointed anyone, and I haven't noticed any particular dissatisfaction expressed here. They launched with a limited time bonus offer to early adopters with the possibility of a well spread range of opportunities at decent rates and as a possible alternative to several platforms. So far they have offered three not particularly appetising loans at low rates, one of which never got near funding, one that funded but took ages to drawdown (if it has) and the other funded but then turned out that it hadnt and got pulled. Promised much, delivered nothing - a total damp squib.
|
|
mason
Member of DD Central
Posts: 666
Likes: 641
|
Post by mason on Feb 25, 2017 16:40:54 GMT
Though they don't engage with the forum much, I do hope savingstream and Paul64 take note of this result. Nothing would please me more than if they managed to clean up their act and rebuild trust to the point I could consider investing in the platform again. |
|
jonno
Member of DD Central
nil satis nisi optimum
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 3,242
|
Post by jonno on Feb 25, 2017 17:04:33 GMT
Could someone explain why PeerFunding got as many votes here as it did. I wouldn't have thought that it had been going long enough to have disappointed anyone, and I haven't noticed any particular dissatisfaction expressed here. They launched with a limited time bonus offer to early adopters with the possibility of a well spread range of opportunities at decent rates and as a possible alternative to several platforms. So far they have offered three not particularly appetising loans at low rates, one of which never got near funding, one that funded but took ages to drawdown (if it has) and the other funded but then turned out that it hadnt and got pulled. Promised much, delivered nothing - a total damp squib. Well yeah; but apart from that............. 
|
|
