Blink and you won't miss it

I assume that you might have FK in mind here rather than FC? Especially since we learn from another thread that FK's much smaller loan book has a substantial ownership by one of FK's backers.
FC may find that its future does not rely heavily on property - shall we say - but its property commitment, including contingent funding liabilities, is small compared with the non-property loanbook. And the capital funding FC have raised seems to me to be sufficient to cover any risk from the property loans without crashing the non-property business. Also I believe that FC has sufficient strategic sense not to overstretch itself chasing growth through property loans at any cost. I might mutter about the effects on the SM, but I think in this emerging P2P sector that, despite 'is's valid observations above, there is something to be said for avoiding being too much of a rate tart and giving some slack to an operator with a solid and proven track record (yes I know about the annoying quality issues).

I believe that FC would agree with you there. I think that FC is probably adjusting the number of whole loans to keep a balance between borrowers and lenders on the main board - judged by the interest rates being within an acceptable band. If they went up to 100 partial loans per week there would not be enough lender cash to support the partial loans and property loans. I am sure FC are working on that - and have been for some time.
They should advertise on TV for the consumer lender.

Despite large numbers of whole business loans (see loan book) being kept off the platform recently, property loans 7848 and 7870 reach the end of their long struggles this pm. No doubt the good people of FC have their Funding Circle Solutions hats at the ready and their mouse fingers flexed  to help these two ascend just before the close.

Edit: In another place FC have announced their intention to start selling the parts they have bought in property loans on the SM, and that this will be their practice going forward. At present this is about £50k in two loans in £20 loan parts.

While this is not good news, in that the secondary market is being used to place loan parts which failed to find a real buyer in the primary market, at least FC have stated that that they will be offered at par, avoiding unfair competition, and the volume managed. It is good that this has been announced and the need not to abuse or unbalance the secondary market has been recognised. At least we know what to expect, though FC are going to find these sub 8% parts hard to shift at par and their total stake will increase before it decreases.

I dunno about that. Every autobidder's going to have exposure already - or soon - so it shouldn't have a knock-on to other par sales, except for just mopping a small percentage of new money up.

FC have bought up unsold 7848.
Their parts at par on the SM, being lower interest rates, will not sell very quickly. My worry is what they will do if their holdings get too high. If they start giving their parts priority on the platform, or if they take advantage of their fees in selling at a discount then those would be two examples of unfair competition.
Funding Circle Solutions Ltd is setting a bad example in the way it is building its portfolio. Rather than spreading its risk through diversity over 100 loans, by the end of the day it will still be a serious diversity criminal with about £100k spread over just four loans.

c*ck*p gets my vote. There's no "2%" flash on the image, but it does say 2% cashback under the loan title, and they've added their usual "question" pointing to the cashback Ts&Cs.

I've bid on it, so I'll be B*****y Cross (see what I did there?) if there isn't any cashback.

Edit: My post and your edit crossed!