oldgrumpy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,087
Likes: 3,233
|
Post by oldgrumpy on Nov 18, 2013 15:47:51 GMT
Didn't spot this (3757/4068) over the weekend but it's back having wasted our time a few weeks back. Strangely it says I am already invested in that company but I have no parts of the earlier loan. I await FC's reply.
|
|
oldgrumpy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,087
Likes: 3,233
|
Post by oldgrumpy on Nov 20, 2013 18:16:06 GMT
OK, it is a bug in the system. Everybody who invested first time round before it was refused will still have it showing that they are already invested in the company. Incidentally, now the loan has lost its "cutey" title. It is now listed as Aquisishon Capitl (4068)*, so people will have no immediate realisation that it is the same abestos company.
* Why can't we name companies/loan IDs when we are not slagging them off?
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Nov 20, 2013 19:11:11 GMT
OK, it is a bug in the system. Everybody who invested first time round before it was refused will still have it showing that they are already invested in the company. Incidentally, now the loan has lost its "cutey" title. It is now listed as Aquisishon Capitl (4068)*, so people will have no immediate realisation that it is the same abestos company. * Why can't we name companies/loan IDs when we are not slagging them off? No problem in using loan IDs as you have here, but naming companies or giving sufficient information for them to be indentifiable without having knowledge gleaned from 'within' the p2p platform is the issue. Its not about whether they are being slagged off: fundamentally its about confidentially between the p2p platform and the borrower which the p2p platform will normally have legal undertakings around (as well as ethical). This is not just an FC issue: the same confidentially considerations apply to e.g. Assetz. If as a user of e.g. Platform X you gain information that company Y is seeking a loan, and then you post that on this forum, then the platform may well (almost certainly will be) liable for breach of confidentiality. In addition, you /may/ be in breach of your conditions of use of Platform X. We need to ensure that users don't inadvertently fall into that problem, and also avoid situation where the forum has lawyers jumping on us. But there is also the issue of just general ethics. If ACME company goes to the bank for a loan, they would not expect a couple of days later to see a notice up on the branch door announcing that they have gone to the bank for a loan of £xxx, which after all is commercially sensitive information. Of course an element of that advertising has occurred when they list on a p2p platform but at least the audience is limited, and is in constrained by their terms of use of the platform.
|
|
oldgrumpy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,087
Likes: 3,233
|
Post by oldgrumpy on Nov 20, 2013 20:50:15 GMT
Thank you for the clarification. So if I poke fun at Lady Bracknell on this site, you (and the rest of our little community) know who to laugh at, but General Googler, searching for bracknellboy scandle won't find what I've said because I haven't named you, and can't prove it either. Or something like that.
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Nov 20, 2013 22:35:29 GMT
That's about the sum of it: and the really good bit is that nobody gets sued for doing things like appearing to imply that BB is a Lady B Boy; 'cos BB is just an ephemeral moniker.
I have to admit that one of the biggest losses of the old forum is the demise of the entire thread relating to a borrower that went into admin. and which has an entirely accurate but particularly evocative use of *'s which neatly summed up lenders feelings. So there are other very good reasons for insisting on adoption of the naming rules, even if they are not entirely rooted in such adult considerations as breach of confidentiality etc.
|
|
|
Post by johnsmith on Nov 22, 2013 10:22:26 GMT
Continuing the deviation from the topic, the blanking of company names like s**t h***e has always been far more entertaining in forum discussions anyway.
|
|
oldgrumpy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,087
Likes: 3,233
|
Post by oldgrumpy on Nov 22, 2013 16:02:42 GMT
|
|
unmadem
Member of DD Central
Posts: 377
Likes: 181
|
Post by unmadem on Nov 22, 2013 16:46:16 GMT
I'm fairly new to this and am mystified why any borrower would accept early with less than an hour to go with the rate dropping ?
I could possibly see a reason if you got a good rate in the first day and needed the money urgently, but in the last hour ?
Can anybody enlighten me.
|
|
|
Post by lynnanthony on Nov 22, 2013 18:06:48 GMT
I'm fairly new to this and am mystified why any borrower would accept early with less than an hour to go with the rate dropping ?
I could possibly see a reason if you got a good rate in the first day and needed the money urgently, but in the last hour ?
Can anybody enlighten me. I wasn't watching this one but generally: 1. Take the money Friday afternoon, knock off and go home, job done. 2. Though the rates the latecoming bidders get is dropping it probably doesn't have much effect on the overall rate the borrower gets; that is more based on what the autobidders have bid at. A 0.1% difference in overall rate only equates to a few quid a month extra.
|
|
|
Post by chielamangus on Nov 23, 2013 10:25:01 GMT
What's gone has gone. On, on!
|
|