|
Post by loftankerman on Dec 3, 2018 20:20:29 GMT
I have no problem with anybody pretty much doing anything they like re Lendy, as long as they don't suggest it is being done in my name. I think turning up at Lendy Towers with burning brands and pitchforks might disadvantage my position, but who knows?
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Dec 3, 2018 17:56:57 GMT
Mr_N .........Besides the " rough % of your investable assets" I can not fathom what other parts of jjc queries are objectionable? I for one would be very happy to see Lendy offer an addition to the secondary market whereby I might purchase parts of the so-called distressed/late loans at a sizeable discount from people effectively tied up in them, allowing them an exit. I have no idea why L does not offer this option to the HNW/professional investors to alleviate the discomfort from the retail investor. Well.... As some of us are aware Lendy can't manage to email us even though they are convinced they are doing. The thought of having them divert from whatever it is they are supposed to be doing to wheel in the changes that might arise from what users think are the simplest of trading alterations sounds like a nightmare to me. Let's not risk earthquake testing this house of cards.
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Dec 3, 2018 17:49:54 GMT
I disagree with you, disagreeing with him, who disagrees with me.......... š A ādislikeā that reduces ālikesā gets personal, a disagree should be to a view on āthatā idea/view only! I agree
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Dec 3, 2018 10:33:38 GMT
It would help to have zero amounts added to the account so that I know that I got nothing rather than that I missed getting nothing due to some admin error.
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Dec 2, 2018 20:17:00 GMT
Sometimes I think a ādisagreeā button (not dislike) would be useful! I disagree ..... I disagree...
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Nov 30, 2018 20:40:38 GMT
The latest five star review by one Leonard Dee makes me wonder if the alleged fake Liam Brookes has a cunning plan and more than one fake identity. The review is so outrageously false that it ought to be warning people away. Perhaps someone has thought that rather than complaining about fake reviews, they should plaster TP with fake five star reviews so bizarre that Lendy would be totally discredited. If I have misjudged this I hope I haven't given anyone wild ideas.
" Excellent business, been with them since the start and personally have made a LOT of money from my investments. Great returns and incredibly low risk.
No losses with Lendy, only gains. Looking forward to a very successful and lucrative future with Lendy; can only see this great company heading in one direction! If you are thinking of joining Lendy I recommend you ignore all the negative reviewers that just want to keep all the good loans for themselves and invest hard and big and then sit back and watch that interest roll in.
Gets a 10 from Len"
Brilliant eh?
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Nov 30, 2018 9:34:52 GMT
Itās worth a quick look at TP. A recent review allegedly by Liam Brookes has been reported by Lendy as a fake review. They should know, I guess. However the same Liam Brookes had four other reviews posted at pretty much the same time. They are collectively amusing. Give them a read before the fakery team spot it was a bigger p*** take than they thought.
Afterthought: It might be harder for them to get the fake reviews of other companies pulled.
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Nov 29, 2018 9:37:55 GMT
I firmly believe more invasive oversight is what is needed right now, but this is just my opinion and should be debated with others. If enough investors request that the regulators should receive detailed monthly updates directly from Lendy, we may find more progress is made across the board. We can debate this eternally, so I would suggest that we conclude any group decision on our objectives in the coming weeks before xmas and then should it be agreed, act upon it in January. Your thoughts boys and girls? Eh? We? Group decision? Act upon in January? My thought... Get lost. Spirited enough for you and your personal vendetta?
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Nov 28, 2018 20:36:51 GMT
At last some light entertainment in the fake reviews department on TP. We have five stars from a lady posting her first review of a Phenomenal Investment. Pity that even with the fantastic returns, she's getting, she couldn't get Lendy's name right.
"... Lenny is one of the more lucrative investments that Iāve made over the years. I am making anywhere from 9-13% on my money currently. Looking forward to the direction Iām headed towards."
I can't imagine why she would be looking forward to defaults etc but it takes all kinds.
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Nov 28, 2018 14:02:28 GMT
Oh yeah, sure! I'd really like Lendy's managerial decisions affecting all lenders to be influenced by a self declared representative handful of hand wringing forumites who just want some of their money back. Whether Lendy know the best or not, they run the show. The T&C always said that. As this thread progresses (?) I'm becoming more supportive of Lendy, not that they'll ever see a new penny of mine. Everybody on board signed on this ship. Nobody was Shanghai'd. Your understanding of lender representatives is obviously lacking. The representatives on the collateral committee consists of highly educated professionals from IT, financial, building and legal backgrounds and I would wager have more years of relavent experience than current Lendy employees who I am sure are working hard but are perhaps sinking under the strain. It is ALWAYS better to ask assistance from those with experience rather than plod on. Perhaps committee members with building experience could offer advice to borrowers that would benefit all. The members would be chosen by pro rata voting of those who actually have invested their hard earned cash. There is no downside to this. The best performing companies are those with representatives of customers and employees. They may not manage to get any better returns but at least we should know we had had the best chance. Seems my broad lack of understanding might have me in a better position than your elevated view. Ignorance rules okay!
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Nov 28, 2018 11:11:32 GMT
Am I the only one thinking this thread seems to be evolving P2P into the realms of fantasy football?
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Nov 28, 2018 8:52:08 GMT
Loans all slowly moving into IA Ā£1000 left out of Ā£20000 in IOA . Why donāt they set up lenders committee to reflect wishes of lenders rather than current āWe know bestā and you have to live with what we decide. Oh yeah, sure! I'd really like Lendy's managerial decisions affecting all lenders to be influenced by a self declared representative handful of hand wringing forumites who just want some of their money back. Whether Lendy know the best or not, they run the show. The T&C always said that. As this thread progresses (?) I'm becoming more supportive of Lendy, not that they'll ever see a new penny of mine. Everybody on board signed on this ship. Nobody was Shanghai'd.
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Nov 28, 2018 0:20:27 GMT
I agree with this. Take a look at how BDO are handling the COL wind up, 6 months in and theyāve racked up hundreds of thousands of pounds in fees and have basically recovered nothing. Whilst I am VERY unhappy with LY, I think shutting them down would give us an even worse outcome. My fear is LY seem to actually be shutting themselves down. Lendy going into run-off is no bad thing, will help them conserve cash and delay getting administrators in. Yeah, I agree. It looks to me as though they are trying to kick off a new more moderate image and wind down the old one by attempting to meet their obligations and recover what they can. Someone suggested a while ago that they might be trying to evolve a good bank and bad bank approach. In some respects it might be a bit optimistic as I don't see much enthusiasm for more money getting chucked in to keep the old bank image afloat. Nonetheless, I'm sitting back waiting. Lobbing grenades at them won't really improve matters any more than fuming will.
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Nov 26, 2018 0:08:13 GMT
In addition to putting in the start date you need to click on the tick mark to the right of it.
|
|
|
Post by loftankerman on Nov 24, 2018 11:31:59 GMT
I often wonder if some people think ' Capital may be at risk' is just a 'Project Fear' ploy by those who wish to keep all the juicy 12% loans to themselves and their mates. I decided how much of a 100% loss I could shrug off and have less than that invested in Lendy. I don't anticipate a 100% loss anyway, unless of course some n*b heads decide that the best way to save this sinking ship is to cut a hole in the bottom to let the water out.
|
|