adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on May 16, 2024 21:53:39 GMT
totally agree with the above 2 gents - as I have said before I do wonder just how much serious criminal involvement has taken place here
- probably matched by the gross incompetence of the FCA and their desire to hide reality - maybe they were trained by the former Post Office "management"?
Sorry chaps but like the PO - you can run but you can't hide and the truth will come out
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on May 16, 2024 21:40:28 GMT
what an insightful. non-patronising and intelligent comment if only I had thought of that...
Maybe we will learn more AFTER these court hearings
From Mousey's web page very true - and I am very grateful for his posiitve input...
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on May 16, 2024 15:57:03 GMT
I really don't get this situation apart from the fact I feel we are being scammed
I am really not sure how FS got into this mess in the first place - I don't object to paying our solicitor but how the hell did the need arise for us to need one in the first place
£0.5m loan which is not on the books, nothing told to us about it, no details of why it was made (I can guess!) and now this bloke is bringing this quistclose rubbish which strikes me as nothing other than a perncious blocking device by some too clever by half legal smart-ar"e. Surely there must be some sort of contract written up before this bloke handed over £0.5m!
There is clearly something very "odd" going on here!
I wonder how this will end-up - maybe he closes his claim so the balance goes back to the investor less a very nice tasty chunk for the solicitor
What a wonderful and efficient organisation the FCA was - I felt so pleased knowing how they protected we investors on their mega salaries
Even if our solicitor gets costs awarded I bet we don't see a penny...
Time to metaphoricaly kick the family cat!
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 28, 2024 11:31:46 GMT
neither am I and all the verious FS "explanations" written in obscure English is doing my head in let alone the complex legal arguments.
I guess this creditor (if it is who I think it is has an interesting history) is using this is a blocking technique and certainly been successful to date!
As I said hopefully this nonsense is thrown out but our legal friends will still need paying...
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 27, 2024 11:16:35 GMT
ok the FS client account - honestly...
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 26, 2024 23:18:47 GMT
Great work Mousey - hopefully this nonsense is thrown out of court As I said before I don't see what this has to do with loan investors - if this clown has a claim against FS then surely it should come out of their assets - as their assets is zero then they get nothing - tough but that is business
Who the hell is paying for this legal action - I bloody wonder...
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 26, 2024 0:09:03 GMT
why the hell are we having conversations like this - if FS did their job properly or even legally (?) then we wouldn't! Sadly I don't have undisclosed sums of £500K in my accounts!
I am no lawyer but I will be very surprised if there is any legal case whatsoever for the above - this is so complicated and legally unproven it will cost a mega fortune in legal fees to sort out and get a judgement let alone a court order for the funds. I just don't see how any investor can lend against a secured asset and then have part of the interest/capital deducted because FS entered or did not enter into a Quistclose agreement
A Quistclose trust is a method by which a creditor can hold a security interest in loans, through inserting a clause into the contract which limits the purposes for which the borrower can use the money Surely if there is a case here it is for FS to repay the loan from its assets which (I don't think) are investor funds
Whole thing is a bloody farce gping to bed now - I can sleep quite easily without reading about Quistclose
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 24, 2024 23:56:53 GMT
Totally agree - as I said before this is a legal trick by the borrower JS Star and FS failed to secure our money - what the hell is difficult about secure a charge on a property!
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 24, 2024 12:20:32 GMT
Is it just me but I really don't buy this - surely there is no chance whatsoever of JC S***r having a claim on this (surely totally unconnected loan)?
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 14, 2024 11:39:13 GMT
thanks for poining it out - I am also getting repayments on loans - I only have bad debts with the following message
well I am not complaining
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 12, 2024 11:42:26 GMT
Clearly we have all been shafted here by pernicious criminal activity which has not been helped by the useless FSA
Gone over the Mousey notes again - clearly there is a lot about this case which we have not been told
As I see it James *awyer is highy significant and as per below
this looks like money laundering to me so who was going to buy it? And where was the money to come from - hopefully not from the undisclosed loanbook loans...
Could the buyer be a FS borrower - I wonder! Also just what was the role of *uxmore and is their any connection to the Manchester building lot etc - no idea but the whole lot stinks to me
Looks like this muppet very nearly got away with it but the FBI and the 4 FS lenders stopped this I hope he loses his entire pension and any "arrangement" fee paid to *awyer
Hopefully the press etc will not stop now. As I said looks to me that the Father has really helped his moronic son out - blood is thicker than water but it hasn't repaid my large investment with this muppet so will just have to move on now
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 10, 2024 23:21:43 GMT
From the court documents damn bloody right! As I said they told me they were...
Fantastic professional piece of reporting Mousey - the antithesis of the "professionalism" not shown by FS or the FCA
Will read your reports again with a clear head - at least the FBI seem to be or were after this muppet
Looks to me as if his very aged and well-respected Father has bailed him out - for a bloke in this 50's this is totally pathetic mental issues- course he had despite being cognisant enough to organise a flight to Spain!
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 7, 2024 23:56:10 GMT
When I invested I contacted FS and explicity asked them if they had these art works in their possession and yes I was told they had - well explain that one FS!
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 7, 2024 11:31:38 GMT
just had repayment details of this one
I had 9 x £25 invested it what I thought were unrelated loans and I get back £2.57 for each loan
Clearly fraud is suspected here on this pathetic return
That said I think we have the private litigants to thank because if left to FS I am sure this would have been a 100% write-off
Well I guess £23.13 out of £225 is more than I was expecting but still totally inexcusable
|
|
adrian77
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 4,130
|
Post by adrian77 on Feb 6, 2024 10:26:54 GMT
Thanks Mousey -great work
If this "investment" had say earnt them a killing on a building land deal then I doubt if they would want their money back and the deal cancelled!
I really don't get this - strikes me as complete horlicks and a legal bodge to play for time - also FS never told we lenders what has happening
If you lend money to a company then surely you are either taking a risk as shares or the loan is supportedby a charge?
What we have here seems to be a load of whataboutery based on some mystical report of an unofficial agreement
Or as we learned legal counsel say - total b*llocks!
There is one big time winner here and it is not the FS investors...
|
|