What annoyed you (in the news) today?

When you say "used to mean", what do you mean by that ? What sort of timeframe are you talking about? Since you reference Starmer, presumably you mean "until recently"?

As a matter of fact - i.e. legal reality not personal opinion/perception - the bolded line is simply cobblers.

Person A can encourage person B to break into and hot wire the car across the road. That is incitement to commit a crime - or "encouragement" / "assisting" as it is now more generally referred to. No Nazi salutes needed. No Nurnberg rallies required. No hundreds of thousands of people. Just Bob encouraging Jack to nick that vehicle. Or to go kick the c*** out of Faisal. Or set fire to a mosque/asylum hotel. 

EDIT: On the point about "clear plot to murder". That would be 'conspiracy to commit' a crime, not incitement/encouragement. Different things, different offences, different thresholds. BTW, the concept and protection of free speech is pretty deeply embedded. The critical point is that of "harm". The old adage "my right to swing my fist stops at your face" is kind of in play here. 

yes 2 tier  Policing - the Met don't even caution for minor drugs offences, in rural areas they do, and people go to jail for something that isn't prosecuted elsewhere. That is clearly 2 tier policing. 
In this example In the met it doesn't even get to the CPS.

So is nationalising some of the utilities and rail as is having well funded state services.

Actually though, such a policy is also favoured by the libertarian Right.

Do we all have to fit into one box?

Thats 2 tier Justice IE when it gets to the courts

We have 2 tier policing

For example Harry Miller - The infamous "we need to check your thinking" www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCxQI9U_xHE . Humberside police can investigate Someones tweets yet 9/10 times for burglary, car theft etc the best you get is a crime number so you can claim on insurance. Police priorities are wrong

the Colston Statue :- Superintendent Andy Bennett of Avon and Somerset Police stated that they had made a "tactical decision" not to intervene and had allowed the statue to be toppled, citing a concern that stopping the act could have led to further violence and a riot. Compare that to heavy handed policing of the disorder with police horses charging into crowds, and indeed I've witnessed the same at football matches with very heavy handed policing of supporters quietly and peacefully walking to the stadium.

The Anti HAMAS protestor who was assaulted, and arrested for assault, only when the police were shown evidence of him being assaulted was he released, and the police claimed they had arrested him for his protection - think on that, you are threatened or attacked and the Police arrest you not the perpetrators.

Sorry - are you complaining that forces can set their own priorities for their limited resources, and can react to circumstances facing them?

Not as far as I'm concerned: but the ultra liberal / lefty label is one bandied round on here quite a lot. And not by me. And rarely does it seem to be used as a term of endearment. 

They don't have to now, any idiot can post their vitriol on social media and it gets reposted by the echo chamber so the audience can be millions. People like that woman need to realise that posting an incitement to blow up a mosque full of people could easily be read and acted on by people already primed for violent action. If it had been a young male (law abiding) Muslim (in a moment of frustration and rage) inciting people to blow up a church full of people, what would we think?

I don't think age or sex is an excuse. I don't know her so I don't know if she is an 'innocent grandmother' but I don' know any grandmothers who would say, let alone post, anything so vile.