guff
Posts: 730 
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Jul 27, 2016 16:21:58 GMT
... methinks you should return to that planet of exotic hairstyles from whence you evidently came!  Forty years may be a bit too far… even if I am now Follicly Challenged.
|
|
r00lish67
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 4,048
|
Post by r00lish67 on Jul 27, 2016 19:14:30 GMT
Following today's advertised works to the Transfer In page (now "powered by Barclaycard"), my company FC account appears happy to accept instant debit card transfers in using my company debit card (previously only permitted for personal accounts). All I need now is some decent rate loans to lend on... … or some 3% cashback. Funny you should say that, but strangely enough there was several thousand pounds of an apparently healthy A rated loan dumped on to the SM this morning at a 3% discount (11334). Certainly made me exercise the new transfer in page. It does happen very occasionally, usually when I'm not really paying attention. I assumed it was FC offloading some parts, although they didn't use an FC name, think it was "St***59". Can't imagine why they felt the need for a 3% discount, unless they're somehow committed to not profit from parts they sell themselves - This is assuming, perhaps wrongly, it was them.
|
|
kt
Posts: 105 
Likes: 39
|
Post by kt on Jul 27, 2016 21:24:21 GMT
Do they not sell loans parts they purchased outside of the secondary market?
I would not have thought they would want that exposure so publicly visible.
|
|
r00lish67
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 4,048
|
Post by r00lish67 on Jul 28, 2016 7:02:25 GMT
Do they not sell loans parts they purchased outside of the secondary market? I would not have thought they would want that exposure so publicly visible. They've previously used an ID which was called something like 'FC finance'. In the past, they used to do some pretty odd things, like dumping hundreds of £250 property loan parts at discounts of 5%. There's probably some logic somewhere, unless they're just Feeling Charitable?
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Aug 10, 2016 16:30:17 GMT
... methinks you should return to that planet of exotic hairstyles from whence you evidently came! Oh, alright then acky... 
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Aug 10, 2016 19:12:02 GMT
Hair is over-rated. Who needs it?
|
|
fasty
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 388
|
Post by fasty on Aug 12, 2016 19:48:22 GMT
Uh-Oh; The web site is down to a crawl and I've just got the dreaded "500 Internal Server Error".
Maybe they forgot to feed to hamsters before leaving for the weekend.
|
|
fasty
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 388
|
Post by fasty on Oct 4, 2016 18:14:50 GMT
8120 :
"The Borrower's loan repayments have been received on time in the six month monitoring period and therefore we have reinstated the original risk bank accordingly."
Ah, that well known risk bank. Is that like RBS?
|
|
jcm9000
Member of DD Central
Posts: 181
Likes: 153
|
Post by jcm9000 on Oct 17, 2016 9:33:06 GMT
ah never mind, i'm just being daft...
|
|
mikeb
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 472
|
Post by mikeb on Oct 18, 2016 18:33:01 GMT
8120 : " The Borrower's loan repayments have been received on time in the six month monitoring period and therefore we have reinstated the original risk bank accordingly." Ah, that well known risk bank. Is that like RBS? Clearly that should say "we have reinstated the original wrist band accordingly".
|
|
acky
Posts: 481
Likes: 262
|
Post by acky on Nov 21, 2016 16:15:39 GMT
Abingdon 1 (26088) repaid today (11 months early) but I've only received a small proportion of the monies back into my Available Funds. I don't normally check - have others had similar issues with Fictional Credits?
|
|
|
|
Post by slumberingaccountant on Nov 21, 2016 16:23:48 GMT
Abingdon 1 (26088) repaid today (11 months early) but I've only received a small proportion of the monies back into my Available Funds. I don't normally check - have others had similar issues with Fictional Credits? yes. Im missing part of my money on this (26088). I have just spoken to FC who are looking into it. Also pointed out that new loan 28722 wasnt linking to existing loans. !0 minutes later its disappeared.
|
|
acky
Posts: 481
Likes: 262
|
Post by acky on Nov 21, 2016 16:33:48 GMT
Abingdon 1 (26088) repaid today (11 months early) but I've only received a small proportion of the monies back into my Available Funds. I don't normally check - have others had similar issues with Fictional Credits? yes. Im missing part of my money on this (26088). I have just spoken to FC who are looking into it. Also pointed out that new loan 28722 wasnt linking to existing loans. !0 minutes later its disappeared. Your name does not do you justice - you're certainly not slumbering here!
|
|
|
|
Post by slumberingaccountant on Nov 21, 2016 17:23:39 GMT
yes. Im missing part of my money on this (26088). I have just spoken to FC who are looking into it. Also pointed out that new loan 28722 wasnt linking to existing loans. !0 minutes later its disappeared. Your name does not do you justice - you're certainly not slumbering here! My Account has now been credited for 26088. My spreadsheet will pick this sort of error up. Just doing my bit as many others do on the forum !
|
|
r00lish67
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 4,048
|
Post by r00lish67 on Nov 25, 2016 13:10:02 GMT
It's been said many times before, but I'm really fed up my FC total not reconciling with my personal records just because I've made a few rapid SM purchases. I probably went 6 months without ever realising this was happening, and every time you contact support they resolve it and claim that they're 'constantly improving systems' and would have seen it anyway at a later date.
Just imagine the headlines if Amazon billed everyone's credit card at random for various items that have been ordered but were never delivered, and then when challenged said "but we would have credited it back eventually", and then done that again and again and again.
It's totally unacceptable, and I'm not sure why they think this isn't an IT issue that should have been fixed with the highest priority within days, never mind having existed for years. There will inevitably be hundreds of people who have just not noticed at all that this is a problem.
|
|
