sussexlender
Member of DD Central
Cheat seeking missile
Posts: 550
Likes: 916
|
Post by sussexlender on Mar 1, 2017 22:05:56 GMT
Rather disappointed that I have not had a reply from SS concerning the defective title.
I will try again today to see if they can assist any further.
SXLR
|
|
cooling_dude
Bye Bye's for the PPI
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 4,298
|
Post by cooling_dude on Mar 1, 2017 22:32:54 GMT
Rather disappointed that I have not had a reply from SS concerning the defective title. I will try again today to see if they can assist any further. SXLR Try Paul - paul@lendyfinance.com
|
|
sussexlender
Member of DD Central
Cheat seeking missile
Posts: 550
Likes: 916
|
Post by sussexlender on Mar 2, 2017 0:40:23 GMT
Thanks CD. Will do.
|
|
am
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 601
|
Post by am on Mar 8, 2017 11:31:10 GMT
In response to a PM from the middle of last month Paul64 tells me that Lendy suspect that the outstanding charge against the property is a matter of poor housekeeping and that the charge was erroneously not marked as being satisfied. He also informs me that the company was dissolved (compulsorily struck off) yesterday. I've checked Companies House and the charge is still recorded; I don't know what the legal implications of a charge recorded against a dissolved company are.
|
|
cooling_dude
Bye Bye's for the PPI
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 4,298
|
Post by cooling_dude on Mar 8, 2017 11:40:41 GMT
In response to a PM from the middle of last month Paul64 tells me that Lendy suspect that the outstanding charge against the property is a matter of poor housekeeping and that the charge was erroneously not marked as being satisfied. He also informs me that the company was dissolved (compulsorily struck off) yesterday. I've checked Companies House and the charge is still recorded; I don't know what the legal implications of a charge recorded against a dissolved company are. Charges on CH are not to be relied on, as they rely on the company or the borrower to inform them that the charge has been satisfied, which isn't a regular occurrence. I have seen many outstanding charges that are in fact "satisfied", and indeed there are several Lendy & SSSH still showing on borrowers CH page long after the loan has repaid. There is a legal obligation to register new charges on CH, but for some reason, it is not a legal requirement to inform CH that it has been satisfied (I got this via an e-mail exchange with CH; I will try and dig out the e-mail) The only reliable source to see if charges have been removed from a title is LR (although that can take months to update)
|
|
cooling_dude
Bye Bye's for the PPI
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 4,298
|
Post by cooling_dude on Mar 8, 2017 13:04:16 GMT
In response to a PM from the middle of last month Paul64 tells me that Lendy suspect that the outstanding charge against the property is a matter of poor housekeeping and that the charge was erroneously not marked as being satisfied. He also informs me that the company was dissolved (compulsorily struck off) yesterday. I've checked Companies House and the charge is still recorded; I don't know what the legal implications of a charge recorded against a dissolved company are. For reference, the following is the e-mail I received from CH (last year) in regards to charges... Just to show the above is correct, the following are repaid SS loans that still have charges that are indicated as "Outstanding" (a mixture of old repayments and recent repayments) > PBL005 > PBL008 > PBL036 > PBL090 TL:DR - Charge Statuses on CH can't be relied on
|
|
twoheads
Member of DD Central
Programming
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 1,192
|
Post by twoheads on Mar 8, 2017 15:44:29 GMT
According to SS e-mail, this will be given the number DFL017 and will go live tomorrow.
|
|
twoheads
Member of DD Central
Programming
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 1,192
|
Post by twoheads on Mar 8, 2017 16:04:51 GMT
P.S. I wonder if it's not been updated to DFL017 yet is because, in some ways, it looks like it already says that.
|
|
ozboy
Member of DD Central
Mine's a Large One! (Snigger, snigger .......)
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 4,859
|
Post by ozboy on Mar 8, 2017 16:38:30 GMT
Well, it's on Zoopla, right now for £7.5 Mill, including pp, how does that square with the £11,000,000 "Valuation" (scratches head)?!:-
7 bed block of flats for sale £7,500,000 (£1,620/sq. ft)
H***r R*w 4,631 sq. ft*
Basement and three upper floors
Property description
******* are delighted to bring to the market this exciting development opportunity with a **. H***r R*w is a knock down and rebuild scheme with planning permission for 6 lateral residential flats plus commercial (D2) space on the lower ground floor which could potentially be a gym to benefit future residents.
The existing end of terrace property sits on a site measuring c.196 sq mt and consists of a partial basement with 3 upper levels and a pitched roof constructed in brick and slate with its main frontage onto H***r R*w. The building has previously been used as a Pilates centre with residential upper parts.
The planning was granted on **** August 2014 for a knock down and rebuild mixed use scheme to comprise of 6 lateral apartments all with balconies (with the exception of the 4th floor flat) and with the lower ground floor unit benefitting from a courtyard garden. The proposed total net saleable area is 8300 sq. Ft.
Located a 5 minute walk from M********e High Street with all the amenities and boutiques that M*******e Village has to offer. C*******t village and H*** P*** are also a short walk. Ideally located for transport with M********e S*****n, E*****e R**d, and B***r S****t all within walking distance.
Notice
Please note we have not tested any apparatus, fixtures, fittings, or services. Interested parties must undertake their own investigation into the working order of these items. All measurements are approximate and photographs provided for guidance only.
|
|
GeorgeT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 1,576
|
Post by GeorgeT on Mar 8, 2017 17:24:20 GMT
The asking price of £7.5m roughly correlates with the loan which is for £7.45m.
So basically another SS loan at 100% LTV (loan to current value), at least.
|
|
ozboy
Member of DD Central
Mine's a Large One! (Snigger, snigger .......)
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 4,859
|
Post by ozboy on Mar 8, 2017 17:32:48 GMT
But if it's For Sale at £7.5M how can any "Valuers" say it's worth £11M, where did the extra magic £3.5M come from?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2017 17:37:43 GMT
But if it's For Sale at £7.5M how can any "Valuers" say it's worth £11M, where did the extra magic £3.5M come from? It's a DFL loan which I believe on SS are valued at their final completed valuation for LTV purposes. All a bit meaningless today!
|
|
cooling_dude
Bye Bye's for the PPI
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 4,298
|
Post by cooling_dude on Mar 8, 2017 17:42:32 GMT
But if it's For Sale at £7.5M how can any "Valuers" say it's worth £11M, where did the extra magic £3.5M come from? It's a DFL loan which I believe on SS are valued at their final completed valuation for LTV purposes. All a bit meaningless today! Nope The GDV is 20m - £11m is the MV as reported by the valuation. Been looking to sell for £7.5m since 2015, so this is simply overvalued and as noted, the loan looks to be 100% LTPV It isn't the first on SS - the Garden Centre was a 100% loan and there are several others
|
|
ferdy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 166
Likes: 47
|
Post by ferdy on Mar 8, 2017 17:50:11 GMT
But if it's For Sale at £7.5M how can any "Valuers" say it's worth £11M, where did the extra magic £3.5M come from? In the sale particulars it states The land loan element (£7,452,896) is to assist with the purchase of the property (via the acquisition of the company that presently owns the property) for £11,000,000.I interpreted that as the borrower was buying the company, including the property for 11m. Could it be the company has other assets worth c. 3.5m ? But perhaps I'm misinterpreting ! Common problem.
|
|
ozboy
Member of DD Central
Mine's a Large One! (Snigger, snigger .......)
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 4,859
|
Post by ozboy on Mar 8, 2017 18:05:46 GMT
Either way, surely we should be told where the magic £3.5M fits in?
Hope you're all taking note of this "Valuer" for future "Reference".
|
|