|
Post by elljay on Mar 31, 2015 7:54:01 GMT
Sounds like a plan, but can only pin threads rather than posts. If you start a "Useful info" thread will pin that... Thanks, now done. Sticky tape applied.
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 31, 2015 7:03:46 GMT
Sounds like a plan, but can only pin threads rather than posts. If you start a "Useful info" thread will pin that...
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 22, 2015 9:41:17 GMT
samridlerp2pfa hasn't logged in for a while so I've sent her a PM asking her to join the discussion.
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 22, 2015 9:00:19 GMT
Yup, the definitions are on the P2PFA site here. I'm not sure I'd call a loan that was one day late in "default", but I agree 120 days seems like a long time and 45 days to become "Non-Performing" also seems excessive. Maybe samridlerp2pfa would comment if they're still around?
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 22, 2015 8:26:26 GMT
Interesting discussion. For me I would have said a loan is "late" immediately it misses a payment. At some stage after that if no payments are made it becomes a "default". Do the P2PFA not have a "late" stage before a "default"?
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 22, 2015 8:22:29 GMT
No problem. Glad it's working.
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 21, 2015 18:40:08 GMT
Hmm. Shows up as the new one here. Maybe a caching issue somewhere in the ether...
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 16, 2015 7:25:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 15, 2015 6:53:44 GMT
MoneyThing I'm glad there are some more of these portfolio's to come 'cause I just secured zilch out of today's 4pm scrum and can now share some of the frustrations of those bidding on the earlier loans before the 24 hour limit was imposed. I tried maybe 4 or 5 times to get a bid in but each time got an error saying amount had changed please check and re-bid (or words to that effect). Very frustrating that I was obviously being processed in a queue but there was presumably less than my bid amount available when my bid was processed - surely it would be better to simply give the bidder who is in this position what remains of the loan rather than rejecting the bid. Not impressed, sorry. Evening. Thank you for making us aware of this. I have been discussing this with Shuang tonight and we can implement this adjustment (whereby high bid defaults to what amount is left rather than rejecting). Before doing so I just wanted to ask whether this would suit other investors also? Sounds a sensible way of implementing "first come first served", but while demand far outstrips supply maybe a fairer (but more difficult to code!) way would be a max amount per lender that increases every 24 hours - e.g. £100, £200, £300... With the code change you're talking about above the last person would then get the remainder of the loan rather than having to bid exactly the amount left.
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 13, 2015 16:48:35 GMT
I've got a zero figure sum with Wellesley and haven’t had an email! Disgusted of West Sussex
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 9, 2015 19:00:26 GMT
so pleased I just had to try it I liked it so much I bought the company! Yikes, showing my age now!
|
|
|
MoneyThing (MT) in Administration
MoneyThing
Mar 8, 2015 19:29:13 GMT
Post by elljay on Mar 8, 2015 19:29:13 GMT
PS - did anyone get relegated?? Yup - MT and FK swapped places.
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 8, 2015 19:07:48 GMT
I very much take Andy's point about moving on, but I cannot let 'their is a problem' go unnoticed. I never pretended my English was perfect, and the subject is not me. If you want to play grammar and language Nazi with fellow board members then there are numerous forums where you can go and play this very childish game to your hearts content. [mod hat on] Ok, enough. Point made. Move on please. Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 3, 2015 18:02:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by elljay on Mar 3, 2015 18:01:15 GMT
|
|