|
Post by seisman on Sept 19, 2023 15:08:37 GMT
Posted by Greenwood23 hours ago
If your Father(?) had paid back the loan when it was due six long years ago we would all have been happy. Why didn't he just pay it back when due, before any default proceedings were started, if you had the money all the time?
Or if you are a third party and were offering to buy the property for £2.5M to allow the loan to be paid back, why didn't the sale take place? Wouldn't the borrower sell to you?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Greenwood2
1. Open Invitation - Come and read the paperwork!
2. You are very vocal and a real protagonist on here, the real issue is an early default, prior to the repayment date, and when an extension had been agreed with the CEO Mr alexander, so no early default was ever anticipated - the day before the loan was originally due for repayment!
3. Phnoe records and screen shots exist as do letters of confirmation - please do come take a look and then voice who and why it has dragged on for the last 6 unhappy years and why a pensioner is also suffering so unfairly and a lender can get away with unlicensed lending and NOT PAYING THE INVESTORS ACROSS THE LAST 6 YEARS!
4. YOU, should request in writing from CG&Co why they refused to accept the funds through Solicitors - I invite you to write to Bond Adams Solicitors for them to share the files, we will give consent when your letter arrives! - GO ON Greenwood2! - Find out the truth dont just sit and moan and blame us, find out who to blame!, and then shout it from the rooftops!
5. We invited every single investor to our offices to view evidence, to join in a legal action to make claim for not only interest but damages, you moan about a few thousand you have in this loan! - we lost millions because of the actions of this lender! But, thats not where the value of damage is done, money is unfaithful and comes and goes, the real damage is to the people, the misery and harms and loss of life to families and futures, the kids and grandkids, for what and who?
6. OZBOY, SteveT and others who regularly like the posts you make are symptomatic of not doing anything to clean the industry up, yet you all moan when the lenders take the mickey out of everyone but you are so afraid of standing up for your rights you become, cattle, scared of the headlights! and why??, Because you are afraid of loss, the loss of your money, you become puppets to the lenders who misbehave and you blame the borrowers and believe the stories put about by who? and why?
7. Everyone knows the property market in the UK has risen over the last 10 years, yet this property with the lenders charge on it has fallen over 52% by a dodgy valuation used in court and now its bids are up somewhere around £2million behind the scenes, that over £900k more than was used in the fraudulent settlement papers in court! but still £500k less than the exchanged contract at £2.5million which the owner is entitled to, thats £1.4million to state the difference we are losing equity of! - well you go lose that Mr Greenwood2 and you see what hurt is!, but see the human element of the pensioner who has lost that through sophisticated games before you accuse from an uninformed basis, you are clearly intelligent so why act dumb?
8. Stop this in the marketplace, you will find your money goes further and you get it back from these platforms, its P2P why should the investor or the borrower lose anything, the platforms are intermediaries only, introducers between partues, so why do they get involved in LPA operations and represent on their platforms that your money is ringfenced in dormant non trading entities such as Social Money (Holdings ) Limited - which was formed two years after being falsely promoted when this loan wa sinvested in, but who held your money ringfenced Mr Greenwood2??
9. YOU are to blame MR Greenwood2 for your unhappness with this loan, we wish we did the due diligence prior and found out about no licensing, no mortgage permissions and a company promoted byu the directors of the lnder, relied upon as a term of doing business - did not ever exist! , this is false promotion and guess what Mr Greenwood, its illegal! Fraudulent! and makes the Directors who promote personally liable for any reliance and loss - are you a victim of loss? , have you sufferred? , if not, politely , please stay quiet on here, if you have lost then why have you not got in touch with us?
10. The answer is, you are either a secret member of the lender, a supporter of fraudulent promotion of non existent firms and terms, or you are just like the other moaners on here, that cannot be bothered to set about improving things for the P2P market place, as you are just looking for an easy ride and reliant on the platforms making you money without accepting responsibility to turning a blind eye to regulation breaches and law breakers, that you never assist to be caught, rules and laws that are criminal breach levels to be enforced - when you could and should!
11. The borrower has been out of his mind legally speaking since 18 Jan 2018, following the car accident, aged now 83 unwell and still in recovery (how old are you?) so he has been taken advantage of but wants to complete his sale, he could be sued for non completion but we have not sued him, why, because he can complete his sale, why is not completed, ask the GEE's at CG&CO, they are lapping up the life of luxury off other peoples sufferring and assets here, ask for their costs on this matter see what charges have been billed! - bet you have not earned those sums from this case!
12. Time to stand up and be counted, why dont you help and assist the truth to come out and justice for all invested in the loan!?, not just moan!
13. We will never give up, which will help YOU, you should add value to that not shoot the help down!
|
|
|
Post by seisman on Sept 19, 2023 2:06:42 GMT
Well said SoMo! "a person who has been convicted and jailed for fraud" - that says it all about your father matey. The long and short of it is that these borrowers choose to default on their loans. They ignore emails, letters and phone calls. In this case, the borrower has even been to jail for his crimes. Despite that complacency and arrogance, they never take responsibility. I have got a solution for you and won't even charge you for my guidance: pay the money back which you borrowed from SoMo lenders and all your problems will be solved. Simples. Neither SoMo nor any other lender has ever caused me a single problem in my entire life. Why? Because I don't borrow money I don't pay back. Hello p2pfan! Firstly, insulting a pensioner aged 83, someones father who you dont even know is just simply rude! Secondly, You, have no idea what you are talking about re these borrowers CHOOSE to default on their loans! Long and short of it is, you believe that stupidity because it suits your bigoted opinions! - NO ONE wishes to default on loans and lose their hard earned money and property and homes, uproot families and lose everything!, what utter nonsense! Thirdly, no email letter or phone call has been ignored by the borrowers or guarantor or solicitors, in fact the contrary is applicable in this matter! - dont get quoting what you do not know about factually! Fourthly, In this case the borrower has not been to jail, he has not committed any crimes!, thats slanderous! .... the guarantor went to jail and he has the right to go to jail the same as he has the right to appeal his sentence when he wishes and to present his evidence of wrongful arrest prosecution and suppression of evidence that would have cleared his name!, the evidence is his evidence and he can use it how he chooses and for when he chooses! - its a free country and the wrongs of the lender cannot be side-stepped in any way because of the matter of someone losing a court case and going to jail! - the lender and their legal teams on these forums may try smoke and mirrors to mislead people but people are not stupid and will eventually see the truth of matters as facts come forth, you do not hold any facts you just blart out your mind! utter nonsense and lack of knowledge of material facts! Sixthly, is that a word?, NO ONE asked YOU for your guidance, in reality, you have no standing to offer us any on any of the subjects you have imposed the workings of your mind on! Heres some guidance for YOU, come read the papers, see who is telling the full truth of repayment of loan ability or not and then you can spread the word on here!, until then ....... simples! Seventhly, is this a word?, good for you on no problems in your life! YOU are truly blessed! , on the other hand, 100's of property deals over 50+ years and later ... meeting Social Money Limited t/a the Bridgecrowd! Have a good evening, stay blessed and do come see the papers, you may learn something worth your time to put on here that offers some knowledge that you can share and be inclusive that adds value to the P2P community at large! Open invitation!
|
|
|
Post by seisman on Sept 19, 2023 1:30:56 GMT
somo Dear SOMO Representative. I know what I'm about to say is not directly relevant to this thread but there is a reference to cg-recovery.com which I feel needs to be aired. I have considered joining SOMO as a lender for some time, but I was aware you were not regulated for P2P loans, although I see you are regulated for other parts of the business. Given that The FCA has failed to properly regulate most P2P platforms, I now take the view that reputation is far more important than regulation. However, I see from your post in his thread on Sept 13th 2023 at 4:25 PM that you use a company called cg-recovery.com as receivers, although I don't recognise the name jonathan gribit. I feel I should make you aware that cg-recovery is causing lenders in failed P2P platform FundingSecure a great deal of anguish. Cg-recovery took on the administration of FundingSecure in Oct 2019 and for 6 months they behaved honourably in the interests of lenders. They then turned against the lenders, and they have demonstrated a persistent disregard for lenders money. Lenders were invited by Edward Avery-Gee to take legal action against FundingSecure in administration. We did, and we won our case on March 31st 2021, however, Edward Avery-Gee has largely ignored that ruling and is using any available means he can to frustrate lenders for as long as possible. He is withholding several million pounds of lender money and using unjustified reasons for retaining that money. Personally, he is holding over £100k of my ring-fenced money in loans that were recovered by receivers over 2 years ago. Many P2P lenders now consider cg-recovery a fraudulent company and I would recommend staying clear of the company until such time as they mend their ways and pay out the money owed to lenders in FundingSecure. Hello, well at least there is someone else out there to compare notes with! Would you mind kindly providing the name of the law firm you used and any other useful information we may find of help in dealing with CG&Co on a legal basis for the best interests of the protected party (P) the borrower and to ensure the investors get the right information that is suppressed from them, etc. Most appreciated!
|
|
|
Post by seisman on Sept 19, 2023 1:23:04 GMT
Urgent Action Required: Protect Investor Interests, Safeguard (P), and Seek Justice Dear Esteemed P2P Investors, We, as vested charge holders in 52 W*******d Road, E*******n, Birmingham B15 3QQ: have a pressing matter that requires immediate attention from all stakeholders. The situation at hand affects not only the interests of investors like you but also raises serious concerns about the integrity of the P2P lending landscape and the platform treatment of borrowers and investors legal rights. It is essential to recognize the gravity of this issue and its potential implications. Clarifying the Situation: Allow us to present you with the accurate details of the case. A retired, medically unwell pensioner—hereafter referred to as (P)—signed a loan agreement under severe duress. What is crucial to note is that the platform consciously drew up the loan as a business loan, flouting regulations and disguising the borrower's home of over 40 years as collateral. The platform's intentional evasion of legal obligations while exploiting a vulnerable consumer, (P), is undeniable. Two separate legal opinions corroborate this reality, and we possess the evidence to substantiate these claims. The Car Accident's Impact: The narrative takes a darker turn with (P)'s involvement in a car accident in January 2018. The accident rendered him incapacitated, stripping him of his mental capacity. (P) Went from being a legally aware individual to someone unable to comprehend the complexities of legal proceedings. However, despite his compromised mental state, (P) found himself unexpectedly entangled in a settlement that was not only secret but fundamentally fraudulent in nature. The Opaque Settlement: The alarming aspect of this settlement is that (P) was not consulted about it. He had no knowledge of its existence, let alone gave informed consent. It was an impossible settlement—one that he, in his incapacitated state, could not have comprehended or agreed to. This glaring oversight raises questions about transparency, ethical practices, and the true intentions of those involved. Manipulating the Legal System: The platform, fully aware of (P)'s circumstances, capitalized on his vulnerability. The absence of a trial meant that the platform avoided accountability for their claims and dodged facing the repercussions of breaching regulations. The question we must all ask is: who stands to gain from such a situation? Our Collective Offer: In light of these developments, we are extending an offer to all investors. We propose a collective buyout of your investments, followed by a united effort to recover your rightful interest for the past six years from the platform. This collective initiative aims to restore legal rights, transparency, accountability, and fairness in the marketplace. Consequences of Inaction: It is imperative to stress that any disregard for the rights and protections provided under the Mental Health Act 2005 and the Mental Capacity Act is not acceptable. By either contributing to or ignoring such violations, individuals become accomplices to injustice, potentially fraud upon (P). The obligations outlined in these acts are unambiguous and require full compliance. Immediate Action Required: To expedite the resolution of this matter, we implore all investors within the loan to promptly make contact, upon satisfaction of the conversation and provision of evidence of you being a loan shareholder to share their solicitor's details. This information will enable us to coordinate our efforts effectively and drive such progress. Join Our Collective Mission: As stakeholders in this issue, we have a shared responsibility to uphold ethical practices, protect (P), secure your investments, and ensure a just outcome. P2P Investors should be willing to connect in the interests of justice. We are a Charge Holder B*****y Ro*d at the usual place the Male a G can be a com. Confirm your commitment, search the HMLR, search Companies House, these are public domains for your usage and to protect your interests! A Call to Action: The urgency of this situation cannot be overstated. Now is the time to unite, support (P), safeguard your returns, and restore justice to a deeply flawed system which has been abused by careful considered actions, not that the model of P2P is flawed but that unscrupulous platforms can abuse both borrowers and investors by setting them against one another to only gain themselves, this was never the intention of Peer-to-peer lending and borrowing. Consider this: (P) holds an exchanged contract of sale at £2.5million that has always been able to be completed by him or his family, and us, even now. In his best interests and yours, you should allow this contract to complete so you can sue/demand collectively from the platform the last six years full interest on your investments, which have been cleverly and systematically eroded by low valuation and denial of the contract completing. You could have invested that money elsewhere: for returns you are going to be denied, the loss caused by the platform! The LPA works with the platform! The Agent works for the LPA! – NO ONE is working for the best interests of (P) nor the investors, except us! – Therefore, legally by Act of Law no one except us is complying with the Mental Capacity Act 2005! (P) Is losing over £1million at the age of 83 that should be for his retirement, medical care and HIS enjoyment: You are made part of this fraud, defrauding, upon him if you do not act lawfully to make the platform, accountable for its actions! The platform early defaulted, where there was no default and it sent people to smash in with pick axes after failing to land grab by drilling out locks two days earlier 21 and 23 June 2017! – Factual, Police attended, stopped the land grab, trespassing. Q, Was, The Civil action was started to stop the Criminal Trespass and Theft prosecutions! With unwavering determination, Action Fraud is now involved: Why don’t you investors come and have a conversation with him and us for the truth and to discover the misleading broken promises of his supposed legal team (paid for by the Claimant in conflict of interests!) who failed to meet with him since 2018 and during the last six years, following fraud being alleged, met him for the first time in late 2021, and then for only the second time at Court 02 August 2022 where they promised him the legal opinion they used to give away his home to the Claimant without any trial of the Claimants claim. These are the people who to suit their own purposes agreed delay after delay by consent orders between them that have cost both the Borrower and Investors huge losses of sums, interest and default fees! Nothing to do with (P) or the family, who are the only real losers as well! They all broke their professional promises and misled (P) and to date have never provided Counsels Opinion: Both Counsel and Solicitor misled him, promised (P) the Opinion but have never provided it, because they are aware it is a fraudulent instrument used to gain another fraudulent instrument, the 2020 Tomlin and Schedule settlement, an abuse of process, procedural irregularity, abuse of CPR Part 21.10. His home has only been appropriated because of use of that Counsel Opinion Instrument, as it was used. P2P Bridging Marketplace Shout-out: Anyone else affected by dealings with this firm in any way, anyone else please get in touch to speak about your experiences, good and bad? SEISMAN: [B*****y Ro*d Inv*st****s L*****d] is a Charge holder in a lawful exchange with (P) Vested Charge holders and Advocates for P2P Investor and Borrower Rights @sesman - We presume that you are the borrower’s son, a person who has been convicted and jailed for fraud. Your demeanour and actions are well known to our legal team, the Receivers and the investors. It is a matter of fact that multiple judges have ruled against your multiple applications and you have been barred, by the Court, from making any more spurious applications. You state above that a sale has been agreed at £2.5m or you can bring forward buyer for the property at £2.5m. If this is the case, then we are more than happy to proceed with this, or for that matter, any amount within this region. If you have a real offer then please email the Receivers in possession at jonathan.gribit@cg-recovery.com / or the estate agent stating the offer, the person providing the offer and evidence of the method of payment and ability to pay. We will inform the Receivers / estate agent to reach out to you and or expect your contact. Failing that we will assume that this is another falsehood purported by you in a vain attempt to frustrate the ultimate repayment of the loan. Dear SOMO Representative, (nameless as ever) An invitation was made to your CEO, Mr Alexander in 2017, to attend a meeting at your offices to resolve the issues of the Default (your early default - prior to attempts to land grab the property illegally by a) drilling out the locks b) smashing in with pick axes and thugs - Police attended and the illegal trespassers were removed (no paperwork presented to the Police by any of the Gang Thugs, CG&Co or your firm as promised on 26 June 2017 c) on 21 June 2017 the attendance to drill out the locks with no default papers received during a period of an extension of loan agreed with your CEO and with a falsified possession order - all on Police record and documented phone records and letters (any investor is able to inspect the records and paperwork upon acceptance of our invitation as set forth in the forum) - No meeting was ever taken by your CEO, to date, to resolve the matter. Solicitors were hired and engaged to make offer to CG&Co who were and still are frustrating the completion of the sale contract at £2.5million gbp (investors take note when you ask for your full interest - which will only be taken from the stealing of the equity in the property that existed in 2016, to date, that belongs to an 83 year old pensioner who is medically most unwell following an awful car accident in January 2018 which is where he lost mental capacity after returning to the UK from Spain where he was because of medical illness and medical rest under doctors orders. It was your solicitors and the solicitors you caused to be engaged and paid for to defend the protected party's position against your claim which you launched to prevent the Police from prosecuting your firm for trespassing and the high value thefts and damage to the property, the reason for the damages claims and special damages lodged into court for sums between £14-23million gbp against you! The claims have not yet been heard, but will be once the Court locates the lost paperwork, amazing how such things happen, so maany times at the same court! Even if you sell the property, manage to get around the restriction on title put there by the Court of Protection restricting any sale of the property in the lifetime of the Borrower, in his best interests. Fraud is alleged in the proceedings and blocks which have been put in the way to pervert the course of natural justice will be temporary to the claims being effective against your firm and officers, anyone involved professionally misleading the court, etc. The invitation to your CEO remains open to resolve the issue as a man in control of a firm which at the time of lending could not lend on the home of anyone, regulated security requires FCA approval which you did not hold when you took investors money, in fact you could not write mortgage business at all as you held no mortgage business permissions - think about those material facts for a few minutes! All these issues are man made, all issues are resolvable, we are six years down the road and the Gentleman who was vulnerable to exploitation under duress, is now aged 83 and even more vulnerable, at risk of mortality, you think on re culpability of a commercial firm, financially abusing a man and family who always had the money to repay your firm, lived in the house for over 40+ years, not becuase of you and your firm, but because the owner who was an orphan aged 11 came to this country with £5 in his pocket and grafted honestly and with integrity with his wife, found out from the local Barclays Bank Manager the best road in Birmingham, and worked 7 days a week 16 hours a day to get a house in that road! Humble beginnings and work ethic that I doubt any of you could achieve in the same circumstances! God Bless your lucky bones! - Mr Alexander, CEO, tell everyone ...... What was the exit route for your loan to the borrower? .. Be honest! CG&Co share the offers from 2017 and the solicitors confirmations of funding! share the offers from 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and guess what even in 2023! the repayment is available! - But, be aware everyone, not for the extortion! no one is going to financially rape the owner borrower nor family, you investors all hold out greedily to be paid from the equity of the borrower after being led a costly merry dance by the CEO, the firm and CG&Co, do you think thats right? being greedy and getting away with it is a bonus, responsible lending is by statute and laws! - SOMO, we all See the greed in your tone and the condescending offer of your granting the region of the sums you will accept for the property now you have messed everyone about for 6 years to cover up the wrongs you did! Mr Gribit is the same solicitor who did not disclose the sale contract at £2.5million, the exit route for the lending, unless you were also lending irresponsibly! - Trust him!!! ... only in a face to face meeting around the table with all present to resolve the matters and end the matters before you all become culpable for the mortality of an aged damaged unwell 83 year old pensioner who you got evicted out of his home under falsely accounted court paperwork without his knowledge and consent to a settlement he knew nothing about! The Gentleman and his family should all be enjoying his final days and time whatever he has left, in comfort .... instead!! ... and you say you are the face of P2P and responsible lending! God is watching! .... Suggest you make contact to resolve the issues with the family, ask for forgiveness and apologise genuinely, it will make a difference and the legal actions can be stopped so you all stay in business! .... The investors and their money due in full, well thats your cost Mr.CEO - you caused all this pain for everyone .... you fix it! - You are no longer in short trousers, you are in the big playground and its time to face the music and be a man! .... Remember this for the future, Reputation of a handshake and spoken agreement is everything, your word is your bond and you agreed terms of an extension with the borrowers son, you are held to it! whatever damage you have caused, you have to fix it as a responsible man at the helm of a company who investors and borrowers and the marketplace rely upon, you cannot evade responsibility because you love money more!
|
|
|
Post by seisman on Aug 31, 2023 13:32:25 GMT
Urgent Action Required: Protect Investor Interests, Safeguard (P), and Seek Justice
Dear Esteemed P2P Investors,
We, as vested charge holders in 52 W*******d Road, E*******n, Birmingham B15 3QQ: have a pressing matter that requires immediate attention from all stakeholders. The situation at hand affects not only the interests of investors like you but also raises serious concerns about the integrity of the P2P lending landscape and the platform treatment of borrowers and investors legal rights. It is essential to recognize the gravity of this issue and its potential implications.
Clarifying the Situation: Allow us to present you with the accurate details of the case. A retired, medically unwell pensioner—hereafter referred to as (P)—signed a loan agreement under severe duress. What is crucial to note is that the platform consciously drew up the loan as a business loan, flouting regulations and disguising the borrower's home of over 40 years as collateral. The platform's intentional evasion of legal obligations while exploiting a vulnerable consumer, (P), is undeniable. Two separate legal opinions corroborate this reality, and we possess the evidence to substantiate these claims.
The Car Accident's Impact: The narrative takes a darker turn with (P)'s involvement in a car accident in January 2018. The accident rendered him incapacitated, stripping him of his mental capacity. (P) Went from being a legally aware individual to someone unable to comprehend the complexities of legal proceedings. However, despite his compromised mental state, (P) found himself unexpectedly entangled in a settlement that was not only secret but fundamentally fraudulent in nature.
The Opaque Settlement: The alarming aspect of this settlement is that (P) was not consulted about it. He had no knowledge of its existence, let alone gave informed consent. It was an impossible settlement—one that he, in his incapacitated state, could not have comprehended or agreed to. This glaring oversight raises questions about transparency, ethical practices, and the true intentions of those involved.
Manipulating the Legal System: The platform, fully aware of (P)'s circumstances, capitalized on his vulnerability. The absence of a trial meant that the platform avoided accountability for their claims and dodged facing the repercussions of breaching regulations. The question we must all ask is: who stands to gain from such a situation?
Our Collective Offer: In light of these developments, we are extending an offer to all investors. We propose a collective buyout of your investments, followed by a united effort to recover your rightful interest for the past six years from the platform. This collective initiative aims to restore legal rights, transparency, accountability, and fairness in the marketplace.
Consequences of Inaction: It is imperative to stress that any disregard for the rights and protections provided under the Mental Health Act 2005 and the Mental Capacity Act is not acceptable. By either contributing to or ignoring such violations, individuals become accomplices to injustice, potentially fraud upon (P). The obligations outlined in these acts are unambiguous and require full compliance.
Immediate Action Required: To expedite the resolution of this matter, we implore all investors within the loan to promptly make contact, upon satisfaction of the conversation and provision of evidence of you being a loan shareholder to share their solicitor's details. This information will enable us to coordinate our efforts effectively and drive such progress.
Join Our Collective Mission: As stakeholders in this issue, we have a shared responsibility to uphold ethical practices, protect (P), secure your investments, and ensure a just outcome. P2P Investors should be willing to connect in the interests of justice. We are a Charge Holder B*****y Ro*d at the usual place the Male a G can be a com. Confirm your commitment, search the HMLR, search Companies House, these are public domains for your usage and to protect your interests!
A Call to Action: The urgency of this situation cannot be overstated. Now is the time to unite, support (P), safeguard your returns, and restore justice to a deeply flawed system which has been abused by careful considered actions, not that the model of P2P is flawed but that unscrupulous platforms can abuse both borrowers and investors by setting them against one another to only gain themselves, this was never the intention of Peer-to-peer lending and borrowing.
Consider this: (P) holds an exchanged contract of sale at £2.5million that has always been able to be completed by him or his family, and us, even now. In his best interests and yours, you should allow this contract to complete so you can sue/demand collectively from the platform the last six years full interest on your investments, which have been cleverly and systematically eroded by low valuation and denial of the contract completing.
You could have invested that money elsewhere: for returns you are going to be denied, the loss caused by the platform! The LPA works with the platform! The Agent works for the LPA! – NO ONE is working for the best interests of (P) nor the investors, except us! – Therefore, legally by Act of Law no one except us is complying with the Mental Capacity Act 2005!
(P) Is losing over £1million at the age of 83 that should be for his retirement, medical care and HIS enjoyment: You are made part of this fraud, defrauding, upon him if you do not act lawfully to make the platform, accountable for its actions! The platform early defaulted, where there was no default and it sent people to smash in with pick axes after failing to land grab by drilling out locks two days earlier 21 and 23 June 2017! – Factual, Police attended, stopped the land grab, trespassing.
Q, Was, The Civil action was started to stop the Criminal Trespass and Theft prosecutions!
With unwavering determination, Action Fraud is now involved: Why don’t you investors come and have a conversation with him and us for the truth and to discover the misleading broken promises of his supposed legal team (paid for by the Claimant in conflict of interests!) who failed to meet with him since 2018 and during the last six years, following fraud being alleged, met him for the first time in late 2021, and then for only the second time at Court 02 August 2022 where they promised him the legal opinion they used to give away his home to the Claimant without any trial of the Claimants claim. These are the people who to suit their own purposes agreed delay after delay by consent orders between them that have cost both the Borrower and Investors huge losses of sums, interest and default fees! Nothing to do with (P) or the family, who are the only real losers as well!
They all broke their professional promises and misled (P) and to date have never provided Counsels Opinion: Both Counsel and Solicitor misled him, promised (P) the Opinion but have never provided it, because they are aware it is a fraudulent instrument used to gain another fraudulent instrument, the 2020 Tomlin and Schedule settlement, an abuse of process, procedural irregularity, abuse of CPR Part 21.10. His home has only been appropriated because of use of that Counsel Opinion Instrument, as it was used.
P2P Bridging Marketplace Shout-out: Anyone else affected by dealings with this firm in any way, anyone else please get in touch to speak about your experiences, good and bad?
SEISMAN: [B*****y Ro*d Inv*st****s L*****d] is a Charge holder in a lawful exchange with (P)
Vested Charge holders and Advocates for P2P Investor and Borrower Rights
|
|
|
Post by seisman on Aug 15, 2023 0:16:26 GMT
Dear Zaff
Be good to speak with you, just in the process of hopefully clearing our notice with admin to go live.
Regards SEISMAN
|
|
|
Post by seisman on Aug 19, 2018 12:12:43 GMT
Hi Renelapp
Can you tell me some information re the unlisted bond please, maybe you can ask your friend who has invested?
The Bond issuer and any other broker details related?,
I am sure a friend of mine has invested in this but is unwell at the moment so I am helping his partner, she cannot locate the file at present so I am trying other avenues.
Thankyou,
|
|
|
Post by seisman on Nov 25, 2017 14:23:31 GMT
Thanks SteveT
I am presently travelling abroad for next two weeks but will get onto it then.
|
|
|
Post by seisman on Nov 22, 2017 0:05:05 GMT
Before anybody thinks about investing in this loan, thinking the headline LTV looks good (49.3%), please look HERE & HEREThis has been on the SS pipeline for about 3 months, and lots of DD has been carried out (by me and others); there is no way that this property is worth 2.5m. EVEN SS states in its own loan overview that they have had a second opinion of the valuation as they believe it to be slightly optimistic (this never appeared). Hi Cooling Dude, Please see the valuers comments below. He states that the value is £2.5m bc it has planning and it would be fictitious to value it without it. However, we have requested a value without planing and he has provided a figure w/o the planning at £1.75m. We have therefore agreed an advance at 70% LTV of this reduced figure, but 50% for the £2.5m as we believe that the actual figure to be somewhere in the middle. Please see the valuers comments below. Louis Alexander Managing Director t. 0161 312 56 56 e. louis@thebridgecrowd.com w. thebridgecrowd.com i. company info FLpzLCV.jpg Begin forwarded message: From: Chris Booth Subject: Fwd: 52 W******** Road, E******** Birmingham (re B***** R**** I***) Date: 28 November 2016 at 23:54:42 GMT To: Louis Alexander <louis@thebridgecrowd.com> FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <chrisjbooth Date: 28 November 2016 at 23:36 Subject: RE: 52 W******** Road, E******** Birmingham (re B***** R**** I***) To: David Quinney <david.quinney@thebridgecrowd.com> David The difficulty I have with this request is due to the fact that there is planning consent for a 12,500 sq ft and by not asking me to consider it is a ‘special assumption’. When we consider special assumption, I, as a valuer, has to consider what the marketplace would do if the property came to the market – but assuming no planning consent (even though there is one current). I don’t like making assumptions like this – when it is clear that if the property did not have a consent, the marketplace would consider – like other property on W**** Road – that consent could be achieved, so, we have to assess the likely risk the marketplace would attribute to obtaining planning consent (which we know would be obtained – because it has been). I would therefore, have to consider little risk as the history of this site illustrates that this would be correct. Your request is purely arbitrary given the facts. *The value of the existing freehold property but without benefit of any planning permission (i.e. current bricks & mortar value) £1,750,000 MODERATED: BB: Redacted borrower details from email thread Anyone got an update on this deal we have funds to invest in large upmarket development opportunities in Birmingham and this looks ideal!
|
|