NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Jun 17, 2021 14:30:14 GMT
Still nothing here Email withdrawal confirmation received 27/05/21, 3 weeks today... “Your withdrawal request has been received and will be processed as soon as possible.” Yeah, righto My surname begins with F, about a quarter of the way through the alphabet. God help anyone towards the end if they are doing it alphabetically!!! Lol they can't be, my surname starts with Q.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Jun 16, 2021 18:58:01 GMT
Just received my funds today. How long did you wait I am almost 3 weeks now and nothing. I have just given them an absolute leathering via email. I know it wont do any good and has probably put me at the back of the que but it didnt half tickle me up Been waiting since day one. They're clearly only processing a certain number per week.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Jun 16, 2021 12:40:18 GMT
Just received my funds today.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Jun 8, 2021 15:44:55 GMT
Still not received my withdrawal. Anyone else in the same boat?
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Jun 3, 2021 17:25:54 GMT
Not received my funds yet either. They probably resent having to give us anything tbh.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on May 26, 2021 19:49:45 GMT
TBH I wrote all my Liary loans off ages ago so any return feels like a win. But we're getting £1.1m of £4.2m recovered...
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on May 26, 2021 18:13:50 GMT
Reminds me of CEOs getting rewarded for driving a company into the ground. We're just not in their club, so we get shafted.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Jun 8, 2020 23:21:53 GMT
Nothing for me still. Think I've had £200 back or less from £4k so far, not including interest owed. Had to jump through hoops to get that small amount back due to failing the AML checks initially.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Lending Works (LW)
Selling times
Feb 14, 2020 16:37:30 GMT
via mobile
Post by NSFW on Feb 14, 2020 16:37:30 GMT
People starting to run perhaps, so a larger queue? That's a pretty scary thought. I guess this might end up being another total write off. How depressing. I cashed out recently, mostly cos I need the funds for a new home and all the costs involved. It took longer than I expected, after reading some investors saying everything sold in the same day etc. It was pending for days with zero sold and then everything sold in one day. Was tempted to post on here about it but didn't want to cause a panic. The time it takes must simply fluctuate.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Nov 20, 2019 11:01:26 GMT
Oops I voted "Yes" by mistake haha. Can't change my vote it seems. I can change my vote by unticking my selection then ticking an alternative. Hmm that works now. Didn't when I first voted yesterday.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Nov 19, 2019 14:45:30 GMT
If RSM find it so difficult to send emails to particular investors, perhaps they should start sending physical mail regarding the AML checks instead. After all, this adminstration thing is serious and they've made us jump through hoops to get our own money back. Just a thought.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Nov 19, 2019 14:30:28 GMT
Oops I voted "Yes" by mistake haha. Can't change my vote it seems.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Lendy (L) in Administration
AML checks. (L)
Oct 16, 2019 14:50:39 GMT
via mobile
Post by NSFW on Oct 16, 2019 14:50:39 GMT
Both my doctors and my bank won't verify identity as a matter of policy (the bank, Nationwide, would, but only if I was applying for a loan from them) I've just emailed shoosmiths & offered to send them a scan of my driving licence & P60 & asked them if they could verify it on the DVLA website. Trouble is, I don't know any teachers, lecturers, councillors, ministers of religion or solicitors. My dentist is 40 miles away. The only accountant I know personally is my son who is 90 miles away. My husband can't sign it as he's no longer registered with the Engineering Council since he retired. I won't hold my breath, but will update when I get a reply. Could be interesting. Do you think they'd let me drive to Fareham & present myself in person ? We could always nip into West Quay on the way back for some retail therapy. I'm surprised Nationwide won't certify your printouts - they're slogan is "On Your Side" with some promise attached. Barclays did mine within a minute of walking in.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Oct 14, 2019 6:33:02 GMT
That's a bit rich considering the Tories repealed Labour's Identity Card Act 2006 and that's why we have no official photo ID in this country.
|
|
NSFW
Posts: 118
Likes: 58
|
Post by NSFW on Oct 12, 2019 23:37:09 GMT
The FCA have admitted that they awarded FCA approval in order that Lendy perform the remediation tasks set to them by the FCA (such logic would appear to many people bizarre, but that's what they said - see other posts). If improving AML procedures was on the remediation task list the FCA instructed Lendy to do, it would have been pretty easy for Lendy to make amends before they folded. We know this did not happen.
Therefore, it might be sensible to assume that either: a) FCA did not consider Lendy's AML procedures to be part of their approval process (I think most people would think this strange), or
b) FCA examined and concluded Lendy's AML procedures to be adequate, or
c) FCA were remiss in identifying a deficiency in Lendy's AML procedures (FCA should be held accountable, as well as for giving approval to what they had identified was a substandard organisation in the first place), or d) the rules have tightened regarding AML procedures since FCA review (have they? don't think so) - this does not necessarily exclude (c)
If (b) and not (d) then RSM are performing an unnecessary delaying and work creation tactic. It would be possible that RSM believe that any AML procedure performed by Lendy would not be applicable to their forthcoming (we hope) distribution of funds, if it not for the fact that they identified in the Joint Administrators' Proposals that Lendy's AML procedures had . This statement in the Joint Administrators' Proposals would imply (a), (c) or (d).
Is there another analysis?
Lendy's AML procedures were fine. I failed their online checks and had to email high quality photos of documents. I think the term 'certain deficiencies' means that Lendy's approach wasn't Victorian enough for RSM.
|
|