keitha
Member of DD Central
2024, hopefully the year I get out of P2P
Posts: 4,586
Likes: 2,616
|
Post by keitha on Mar 12, 2021 14:40:30 GMT
taken from www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/traders-cash-on-the-line-after-football-stock-market-blocks-access/ar-BB1ewh36?ocid=msedgntp Telegraph Money reported on Football Index in June 2019, following concerns – including from the Betting Adjudication Service, an arbitrator – it was potentially misleading customers by using language more associated with regulated investing than betmaking.
The site rejected the claims at the time and said all of its branding was compliant with the Advertising Standards Authority, the advertising regulator.
It said it was a “virtual stock market game” and a “unique proposition within the gambling industry” which used a variety of descriptive vocabulary to help users understand how it worked.
It said it clearly signposted to customers it was a gambling and not an investment site. so basically to me that looks like they tried to make it look like an investment when in fact it was gambling
|
|
macq
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 1,199
|
Post by macq on Mar 12, 2021 14:55:24 GMT
taken from www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/traders-cash-on-the-line-after-football-stock-market-blocks-access/ar-BB1ewh36?ocid=msedgntp Telegraph Money reported on Football Index in June 2019, following concerns – including from the Betting Adjudication Service, an arbitrator – it was potentially misleading customers by using language more associated with regulated investing than betmaking.
The site rejected the claims at the time and said all of its branding was compliant with the Advertising Standards Authority, the advertising regulator.
It said it was a “virtual stock market game” and a “unique proposition within the gambling industry” which used a variety of descriptive vocabulary to help users understand how it worked.
It said it clearly signposted to customers it was a gambling and not an investment site. so basically to me that looks like they tried to make it look like an investment when in fact it was gambling To me it was never an investment and i would argue that its not gambling - i would say its a form of fantasy sports.The people playing the game did not have a share of the player or any control what they had was the "name" on a account page saying what it was worth.Its the same as playing Monopoly with real money and saying you own the property. Its said the change to the way dividends are paid caused a lack of trust and liquidity but the div's were always at the whim of the platform as they are based on rewards earned by their rules and i assume paid out of the fee's the platform collected on the "buying" & "selling" of players I can see to a point why the gambling commission are involved as your playing a game but are you really placing a bet of any kind?
|
|
keitha
Member of DD Central
2024, hopefully the year I get out of P2P
Posts: 4,586
Likes: 2,616
|
Post by keitha on Mar 12, 2021 15:06:05 GMT
Possibly as much as you are with stocks and shares.
I suppose you had the same with people investing in 1 single stock eg Sirius minerals probably took in some case the same level of hit as people buying Virgil Van Dyk at the start of this season.
the major difference to me is lets say Hargreaves lansdown goes bust, then people still own the underlying shares, with this if the company goes bust you lose your money
|
|
keitha
Member of DD Central
2024, hopefully the year I get out of P2P
Posts: 4,586
Likes: 2,616
|
Post by keitha on Mar 12, 2021 15:56:18 GMT
@dees
given that were true the Valuations of players would not have dropped so much virtually overnight.
people were whinging that there was recently a 10-15% or more gap between the buy and sell price of shares in players ( durr isn't that how the companies make money, most shares etc have a small differential )
there's an old saying about a fool and his money
|
|
iRobot
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,680
Likes: 2,477
|
Post by iRobot on Mar 12, 2021 16:22:39 GMT
There should have been warnings plastered all over FI's pages in red ink that "this is a gambling product, not an investment, and you are more likely to lose money than win". OR a Lord Kitchener poster with the strap line: IF YOU don’t know who the PATSY is, it’s YOU!
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 3,018
|
Post by IFISAcava on Mar 12, 2021 17:31:42 GMT
|
|
agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,038
Likes: 4,435
|
Post by agent69 on Mar 12, 2021 18:13:29 GMT
I'm certain the people that run the platform will have a perfectly resonable explanation as to where all the money went
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,316
Likes: 11,525
|
Post by ilmoro on Mar 12, 2021 19:22:40 GMT
If anyone is getting withdrawal, here's something similar footstock.com/
|
|
agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,038
Likes: 4,435
|
Post by agent69 on Mar 12, 2021 20:54:27 GMT
If anyone is getting withdrawal, here's something similar footstock.com/Use the players you own to win you huge cash prizes
What could possibly go wrong
|
|
agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,038
Likes: 4,435
|
Post by agent69 on Mar 12, 2021 21:05:27 GMT
@dees given that were true the Valuations of players would not have dropped so much virtually overnight. people were whinging that there was recently a 10-15% or more gap between the buy and sell price of shares in players ( durr isn't that how the companies make money, most shares etc have a small differential ) there's an old saying about a fool and his money Trustpilot going into overdrive
|
|
p2pete
Member of DD Central
Posts: 144
Likes: 142
|
Post by p2pete on Mar 13, 2021 12:00:50 GMT
I was never sure whether FI was a ponzi scheme or not. They had a legitimate way to make money from commission. Buy bets were free but they took 2% from sell bets (or 5% for instant sell). As long as they held the money on account from buys, then took commission from the sell bet then it was free money for FI. A traditional bookie simply lays off bets so they profit under any outcome but with the FI model they would have to keep hold of money from buys until the bet transaction was completed (by a sell bet).
If they have been spending the money from buy bets all along and paying sell bets from money taken from new customers then it was a ponzi scheme. It was impossible to tell because they never published company accounts. They were not registered in the UK so weren't obliged to.
|
|
iRobot
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,680
Likes: 2,477
|
Post by iRobot on Mar 13, 2021 12:19:50 GMT
From a lengthy, in-depth article in today's Times: Fans lose £90m in collapse of Football Index" Some have also accused the company of being a “Ponzi scheme ” because they believe it was reliant on attracting new customers to pay out the dividends to existing players.
The Times has spoken to a Football Index employee who appeared to support this. He did not want to be identified but said: “It seemed that towards the end the company was operating like a pyramid scheme. I’m sure that’s not what the company’s original intentions were but that’s what it became.” [continues] "
|
|
p2pete
Member of DD Central
Posts: 144
Likes: 142
|
Post by p2pete on Mar 13, 2021 12:54:11 GMT
As an example, lets say 10 players place a buy bet on the same footballer, starting at 100p, driving the price up to 109p. The same 10 players then instant sell (5% profit to FI). For simplicity they happen to sell in the same order that they bought. So player 1 bought at 100p and sold at 109p and so on. Like this: Under this scenario players lost a total of -52.25p and FI made this same amount in profit. Some players won and some players lost. If you scale that up over millions of transactions it seems like a legitimate way to make money. That's not ponzi, it's just gambling and FI stated on every single page of the site that it was gambling. If however, FI spent all the money from buy bets and then had no money to pay the sells then that looks fraudulent and not a sustainable model. I'm surprised that's allowed by the regulator. If it is allowed, then does that mean I can set up a regular bookie, take millions in bets, spend all the money and then when winning customer ask for their payout, go into administration because there's no money left???
|
|
p2pete
Member of DD Central
Posts: 144
Likes: 142
|
Post by p2pete on Mar 13, 2021 15:49:21 GMT
Someone's been editing the wikipedia page for Football Index "allows customers to gamble on both the future success of football players and the rules of the platform itself"
|
|
registerme
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,619
Likes: 6,433
|
Post by registerme on Mar 16, 2021 21:01:20 GMT
|
|