ben
Posts: 2,020 
Likes: 589
|
Post by ben on Jan 5, 2016 23:17:05 GMT
the hull one has been hanging around for awhile although its probably best staying there
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 5,154
|
Post by adrianc on Jan 6, 2016 9:59:01 GMT
Thank you have now found it, I assume that that the five loans with no valuation are still being formed and the two cells with valuation filled in are near to being offered on line. The "stage" column is the nearest we have to a clue as to what'll be along next. But, don't forget, inclusion in the pipeline doesn't mean the loans WILL happen... Once a loan gets a number, it tends to be another stage nearer, because they're released in numerical order. I thnk DFL001 might disprove that theory, though, because it's the only DFL out there. I wonder if the allocation of a number to that means they'll be less likely to punt it out if something doesn't go according to plan?
|
|
pom
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,922 
Likes: 1,244
|
Post by pom on Jan 6, 2016 14:34:57 GMT
I really like the way the pipeline is displayed/updated now - even if we can't use it to predict when things will actually go live it's great to see things appearing/disappearing and therefore knowing that progress is happening  savingstream |
|
treeman
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 557
|
Post by treeman on Jan 6, 2016 14:51:10 GMT
Just spotted typo in Great Bookham valuation report.......... The reinstatement cost for insurance purposes is around £130,000 (Ninety Thousand Pounds)
Not terribly important, but not too impressive either - should not get through the proof-reading. Hope the other figs are correct  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2016 15:21:20 GMT
When you find the comments "Double Check Though !!!!!!" in biro written in a professional report you just know it is one to leave alone.  |
|
ben
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 589
|
Post by ben on Jan 6, 2016 15:38:46 GMT
When you find the comments "Double Check Though !!!!!!" in biro written in a professional report you just know it is one to leave alone. Have not had chance to read them yet which was that one in
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2016 15:56:17 GMT
The Durham (Northern if not Durham) out buildings being offered to get planning permission. etc etc.
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,334
Likes: 11,558
|
Post by ilmoro on Jan 6, 2016 16:06:52 GMT
The Durham (Northern if not Durham) out buildings being offered to get planning permission. etc etc. Didnt notice that, though there is a typed addition in the instruction letter from one valuer to another along those lines. That said the whole valuation is quite confusing. Lots of references to listed buidling but a statement saying it isnt. Looks like some issues surrounding access & legal title which might cause delays.
|
|
ben
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 589
|
Post by ben on Jan 6, 2016 16:10:18 GMT
had not even seen that one was there
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 5,154
|
Post by adrianc on Jan 6, 2016 16:15:47 GMT
Just spotted typo in Great Bookham valuation report.......... The reinstatement cost for insurance purposes is around £130,000 (Ninety Thousand Pounds)
Not terribly important, but not too impressive either - should not get through the proof-reading. Hope the other figs are correct <whistles innocently> p2pindependentforum.com/post/83238/thread
|
|
ben
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 589
|
Post by ben on Jan 6, 2016 16:23:52 GMT
Reading the documents on the Durham one not only is there no planning permission but planning permission is not expected to go in to March/April,if the loan is to buy the property how do they intend to finance the work if they already own the land why do they need the loan now?
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on Jan 6, 2016 16:40:45 GMT
Reading the documents on the Durham one not only is there no planning permission but planning permission is not expected to go in to March/April,if the loan is to buy the property how do they intend to finance the work if they already own the land why do they need the loan now? Probably worth waiting until Saving Stream have added the loan particulars / description, which usually makes clear both the purpose of the loan and the exit strategy. Pretty pointless trying to second guess matters from the valuation until they've done so.
|
|
treeman
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 557
|
Post by treeman on Jan 6, 2016 16:47:08 GMT
Just spotted typo in Great Bookham valuation report.......... The reinstatement cost for insurance purposes is around £130,000 (Ninety Thousand Pounds)
Not terribly important, but not too impressive either - should not get through the proof-reading. Hope the other figs are correct <whistles innocently> p2pindependentforum.com/post/83238/threadAhh......must've had sieve-head on reading earlier ! I seem to remember being able to remember much better if I remember correctly - or maybe not 
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Jan 7, 2016 21:18:17 GMT
I was reading the Durham valuation report earlier today and it didn't look to me like the valuer had followed the valuation instructions. I used the loan's Q&A to ask the following... Unless savingstream set a precedent and consider this question to be of interest to other investors, I expect I'll be the only one who sees their answer. |
|
ben
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 589
|
Post by ben on Jan 7, 2016 21:23:02 GMT
I really do not understand why they do not share all the questions, after all people might think of something they have not, surely finding any issues is in every ones interest especially SS with these larger loans, if one fail they will probably survive but unlikely if two or three do
|
|
