|
Post by solicitorious on Feb 16, 2015 20:17:15 GMT
In my previous experience of (S)EIS you get issued with nominal £0.01 shares at every round of investment. The date of issue is the tax year in which you can claim the relief, although you can carry back all or part to the previous year.
It would be crucial for me that they are not issued before April 6 2015.
I suspect it would be advantageous for most everyone else too.
|
|
bigfoot12
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 816
|
Post by bigfoot12 on Feb 16, 2015 20:23:24 GMT
It would be crucial for me that they are not issued before April 6 2015. You should probably approach Seedrs and ask them. I've not seen their site before this week so I have no idea, but I know that Syndicate Room have people who are able to make such promises (or know that they are not). Edit: Having just noticed your post a page earlier, you need to make sure you know what you are doing and not because someone on a forum you don't know says so. People on this forum really wind me up because they moan that they can't sell a 3 year loan in less than a month. If you invest in this you need to assume that there is no exit and no secondary market. Even successful businesses sometimes need to raise further money on worse terms than previous rounds. Be careful.
|
|
niceguy37
Member of DD Central
Posts: 504
Likes: 254
|
Post by niceguy37 on Feb 16, 2015 21:06:17 GMT
I've only just started looking into all this; compared to Crowdcube this seedrs site is shockingly bad. No proper structure to the Q&A that I can see - ie. no threads, so that could all get messy. And am I understanding correctly? - you have to put the money in 'within 48 hours of making your investment'? Surely not? All my Crowdcube investments took the money when the fundraise actually went ahead - i.e. several months after I'd pledged the money. I had to fund my account before I could bid. Or so it seemed to me. It mentioned getting a refund if the funding fails. I did think there may be a long wait before it's paid out.
|
|
sqh
Member of DD Central
Before P2P, savers put a guinea in a piggy bank, now they smash the banks to become guinea pigs.
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 1,212
|
Post by sqh on Feb 16, 2015 21:39:59 GMT
This will surely be full long before 54 days. Will Assetz Capital accept overfunding?
From the FAQ seedrs site,
"What is "Overfunding" of campaigns?
After a startup campaign has reached 100% of its funding target, we give entrepreneurs the option of raising more than their target investment amount if the demand is there from keen investors. We call this "Overfunding".
We operate an all-or-nothing model where entrepreneurs must reach their minimum target or investors get their funds back. But if a campaign goes into Overfunding, the entrepreneur will be able to accept any amount from 100% and up during the remaining duration of their campaign (in exchange for a corresponding amount of additional equity). Entrepreneurs are not required to take investment but reserve the right to accept any amount beyond 100%. Investors who invest during this period have the same rights as investors who invested before the campaign was in overfunding, but do not have the right to withdraw their investment or change their mind and must have funds deposited before they can invest. "
|
|
kermie
Member of DD Central
Posts: 691
Likes: 462
|
Post by kermie on Feb 16, 2015 23:08:24 GMT
It would be crucial for me that they are not issued before April 6 2015. I think I misread this earlier. Whilst there is no guarantee, I'd be very very surprised, according to what I've read so far, and the QnA in which Stuart outlines the fundraising plans over the next year or so, if shares were issued before April 6 2015. Almost certainly gonna be after that. At present, an interesting question is raised on Seedrs about whether or not this can remain EIS-compliant given the plan to raise more than £5M within the space of 12 months. IN EDIT: the £5M limit applies to funds raised via EIS/SEIS/etc - if funds are raised outside of these schemes, it's not relevant.
|
|
ed
Posts: 15
Likes: 2
|
Post by ed on Feb 17, 2015 4:33:31 GMT
I'm worried that some may be getting a little excited and I'd like to ask those who have no experience of investing directly in small private companies to think carefully. We may think that AC is a excellent company that's going places but that does not mean this offer is a good deal. Don't forget your principals: what's the security? What if current backers call it in? Is the price you're being asked to pay fair? How do you know? What if AC issue more equity? Do you really want to invest in such a tiny unquoted company? Wouldn't you prefer a FTSE100 regulated company with shares that trade at a "fair" price? Are you prepared to not get that cash back for maybe several years? Do you have a separate cash pot for the meantime? If you have good answers to all these questions then you have my very best wishes but if you don't then please take care.
John
That post is salient and the best written piece of common sense i have seen for a long time(as someone who has a small exposure to vct's as a sideline)!
I would love to add something intelligent but you have hit the nail on the head beautifully!
The only sensible thing I think I can add is high returns=high risk!
Kind regards
Ed
|
|
|
Post by stuartassetzcapital on Feb 17, 2015 6:36:02 GMT
|
|
merlin
Minor shareholder in Assetz and many other companies.
Posts: 902
Likes: 302
|
Post by merlin on Feb 17, 2015 9:50:53 GMT
I'm worried that some may be getting a little excited and I'd like to ask those who have no experience of investing directly in small private companies to think carefully. We may think that AC is a excellent company that's going places but that does not mean this offer is a good deal. Don't forget your principals: what's the security? What if current backers call it in? Is the price you're being asked to pay fair? How do you know? What if AC issue more equity? Do you really want to invest in such a tiny unquoted company? Wouldn't you prefer a FTSE100 regulated company with shares that trade at a "fair" price? Are you prepared to not get that cash back for maybe several years? Do you have a separate cash pot for the meantime? If you have good answers to all these questions then you have my very best wishes but if you don't then please take care. John That post is salient and the best written piece of common sense i have seen for a long time(as someone who has a small exposure to vct's as a sideline)! I would love to add something intelligent but you have hit the nail on the head beautifully! The only sensible thing I think I can add is high returns=high risk! Kind regards Ed Some good common sense in both the above posts. I would add a rule that I learned the hard way and I have followed ever since, "don't invest what you cannot afford to lose". Some time ago I was advised by someone I knew and trusted to invest in a FTSE100 company, Marconi. I was assured that although the shares had taken a dive this was the time to invest as there was good news just around the corner. Six months later Marconi was completely bust and my investment was worth nothing.
My guess is that most "investors" have the gambling gene but there is nothing wrong with being cautious and well informed. I have just chucked a couple of £k into the Assetz ring and I hope that it will be worth double in a couple of years. However it could be worth nothing but I am fairly certain that the team at Assetz will work their butts off to make it succeed. It is in that I trust.
|
|
|
Post by solicitorious on Feb 17, 2015 10:10:21 GMT
We should consider the tax breaks too, since it is EIS. Your maximum potential loss should be 56% of your outlay (42% for a higher rate payer), with completely tax-free upside. [Disclaimer: I am not an accountant. DYOR]
|
|
ramblin rose
Member of DD Central
“Some people grumble that roses have thorns; I am grateful that thorns have roses.” — Alphonse Karr
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 857
|
Post by ramblin rose on Feb 17, 2015 10:33:45 GMT
We should consider the tax breaks too, since it is EIS. Your maximum potential loss should be 56% of your outlay (42% for a higher rate payer), with completely tax-free upside. [Disclaimer: I am not an accountant. DYOR] Not forgetting, however, that many people round here pay little or no tax, for example getting much of their income in the form of dividends. EIS does potentially benefit those people in the form of capital gains write-off if that applies though.
|
|
niceguy37
Member of DD Central
Posts: 504
Likes: 254
|
Post by niceguy37 on Feb 17, 2015 10:34:11 GMT
I'm worried that some may be getting a little excited and I'd like to ask those who have no experience of investing directly in small private companies to think carefully. We may think that AC is a excellent company that's going places but that does not mean this offer is a good deal. Don't forget your principals: what's the security? What if current backers call it in? Is the price you're being asked to pay fair? How do you know? What if AC issue more equity? Do you really want to invest in such a tiny unquoted company? Wouldn't you prefer a FTSE100 regulated company with shares that trade at a "fair" price? Are you prepared to not get that cash back for maybe several years? Do you have a separate cash pot for the meantime? If you have good answers to all these questions then you have my very best wishes but if you don't then please take care. The reason I've avoided CrowdCube and Seedrs up until now is that I worry that I'm competing with others who might have more enthusiasm than sense. In particular I think it's hard to come up with an accurate valuation of the company, so as to assess how much of that company you are actually getting. If enthusiasts are investing because they like some business concept, they might not be getting a big enough share in return.
|
|
|
Post by solicitorious on Feb 17, 2015 10:43:49 GMT
You also pay tax on the interest on your P2P investments, don't forget! Basically, to obtain maximum relief you should invest a maximum of 3.333 times your total expected annual tax bill, although with the carry back facility you could potentially invest twice that amount [which is why it is crucial to understand in which tax year the share issue will fall]. Don't forget there will be at least one further round of investment however. [Disclaimer: as above]
|
|
ramblin rose
Member of DD Central
“Some people grumble that roses have thorns; I am grateful that thorns have roses.” — Alphonse Karr
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 857
|
Post by ramblin rose on Feb 17, 2015 10:49:53 GMT
You also pay tax on the interest on your P2P investments, don't forget! Only if that and other income pushes you over the tax free limit. For many it will, but for some of the non-working p2pers whose main other income comes from dividends it won't. I accept I'm pushing the point but my point is really it isn't safe to assume everyone is liable to pay income tax, especially in a world of finance savvy types.
|
|
|
Post by solicitorious on Feb 17, 2015 10:59:38 GMT
Hence my statement of the maximum investment of 3.333 x tax liability. If you pay no tax, you'll get no relief, although that of course is just one factor in considering whether to invest.
|
|
unmadem
Member of DD Central
Posts: 377
Likes: 181
|
Post by unmadem on Feb 17, 2015 12:07:27 GMT
There is a post higher up indicating that if you join via the link fees are halved for us, (this wasn't made clear on the email alas so I don't think I used it).
Looking at the seedr web site I have a suspicion this is being achieved by AC getting the referral credit and having chosen to pass it back to us. Perhaps stuartassetzcapital could confirm if I am correct and that all the benefit is being passed back to us. If that is the case perhaps the normal rule on referral links (which I agree with) might be relaxed.
|
|