Brexit: In or Out

In the past the Sali Army was my preferred charity but I’m afraid that I no longer donate to it together with a number of other charities as a result of wastage and the salaries earned by some top people who are often members of the elites.

For the benefit of any gamblers out there (and very much "mod hat off" )

Remainers: AC Leeds Office block @ 13% (plus minor default interest on missing repayments) has been selling steadily at par over recent days. Just under £14,000 currently available at a 2% discount.

Leavers:  Betfair odds for remain vote <=40% are around 50-1 100-1  and for 40-45% around 25-1

The former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan takes today’s prize for world class elitist arrogance after making the following statements:

1. “I like the EU because we cannot control EU internal immigration. I love all the vibrant Europeans who have moved here, and the fact I can leave whenever I wish and settle in Lodz or Naples.”

So he can leave whenever he wishes, how many ordinary working people can simply move as he describes? The man demonstrates the elites’ total lack of understanding of the lives of millions and displays breathtaking contempt for the majority of the population.

Such contempt deserves one response: "Well, b*gger off then mate."

2. “There is one anti-EU argument I detest worse than anything Nigel Farage has ever said. It is the “left wing” argument that immigration depresses wages for British workers.

This argument is pure racism. It presupposes that the chance that a British worker might get £10 rather than £9 an hour, is more important than giving a Romanian worker moving here the chance to get £9 an hour rather than £3. Just because one is British and one is Romanian. Racism, pure and simple.”

One simple response to that, why should any worker see their earnings reduced as a result of uncontrolled immigration? But then of course £1 an hour or £40 a week, £2000 per annum is small change to people such as Murray.

The man’s arrogance and ignorance is unbelievable but is no different to the majority of the rotten and corrupt establishment in the UK currently urging us to remain in an equally rotten EU.

www.craigmurray.org.uk/

registerme yes I think we do agree on many points but have differing views on others.
1. Controlled immigration is indeed a positive for any country. But it has to be controlled in a way that those newcomers can benefit the country. What we have is uncontrolled immigration. Controlled immigration allows you       to plan for a population growth, allowing the required services to be put in place. Uncontrolled immigration results in a heavy burden on housing, health services employment and education. Uncontrolled immigration             impacts on the benefit system, whether it be housing benefit, childcare funding, unemployment benefits or tax credits.
2. It is clear from the unbiased reports that the majority of the people flooding through southern Europe are indeed economic migrants. There is a percentage of "true" refugees but they are in the minority. True refugees           would happily settle in the first safe haven they arrived in. Unfortunately what we see are masses of young, well fed young men desperately keen to reach northern Europe and England, driven on by the state welfare             system.
3. Whilst accepting that my point of England being the goal of the majority of immigrants may not be correct, I still maintain that our lax benefit system is a magnet for the multitude heading to northern Europe.

I'm sorry but I can not understand how you think border free travel saves the UK haulage industry money.

I'll drink to that....

                                                                       Attachment DeletedAttachment Deleted

And i did.. in Wither-spoons.. with a pint perched on these pertinent beer mats

                                                                                  

And charge them.. a billion a year.. woo hoo we're rich.. or will be on friday morning, hopefully.. fingers crossed.. polls not lookin good tho.