|
Post by jevans4949 on Aug 12, 2016 2:38:43 GMT
Oh, and in my opinion probably the only way to encourage folk to reduce their use of environment damaging hydrocarbons is by taxing the user. A perfect example of that being the plastic bag tax. I think I'm right in saying that the country used some five billion (!!) less plastic bags in the year after it was introduced. I wonder how many barrels of oil that requires? There was a news item about this a couple of weeks ago. Apparently plastic bags are made from a hydrocarbon that is too volatile to be used in fuel, so if not used for plastic bags has to be burned off by the refinery. So making less plastic bags is actually resulting in MORE atmospheric CO 2.
|
|
|
Post by oldnick on Aug 12, 2016 3:54:04 GMT
Logic dictates that the bags should still be manufactured, but then buried in deep holes to lock the carbon away. Except that's exactly where the raw material was in the first place.
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on Aug 12, 2016 6:40:26 GMT
A perfect example of that being the plastic bag tax. I think I'm right in saying that the country used some five billion (!!) less plastic bags in the year after it was introduced. I wonder how many barrels of oil that requires? There was a news item about this a couple of weeks ago. Apparently plastic bags are made from a hydrocarbon that is too volatile to be used in fuel, so if not used for plastic bags has to be burned off by the refinery. So making less plastic bags is actually resulting in MORE atmospheric CO 2. Erm, that sounds like baloney to me. Supermarket bags are made from HDPE (high density polyethylene) which has myriad other uses, from carpets to underground pipes to car bumpers to plastic timber. In turn, HDPE is made from catalysed ethylene, one of the most basic hydrocarbon building blocks that's used for making myriad other compounds. Any refinery flaring off ethylene is literally burning money
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Aug 12, 2016 8:57:00 GMT
Any hydrocarbon can be used as fuel, although some are hard to transport (compared to the liquid ones which go into petrol, diesel, kerosene etc). If the refinery is 'flaring it off' then by definition is was being burned and producing energy .. fuel, Q.E.D.
|
|
|
Post by oldnick on Aug 12, 2016 10:47:12 GMT
From a US environmental website; Plastic bags use 40% less energy to produce and generate 80% less solid waste than paper. Paper bags generate 70% more emissions, and 50 times more water pollutants than plastic bags. Even paper bags made from 100% recycled fibre use more fossil fuels than plastic bags. The item most frequently encountered in landfills is paper—on average, it accounts for more than 40% of a landfill's contents. Newspapers alone take up as much as 13% of landfill space. Plastic bags are extraordinarily energy-efficient to manufacture. Less than .05% of a barrel of oil goes into making all the plastic bags used in the US while 93% - 95% of every barrel of crude oil is burned for fuel and heating purposes. Although they are made from natural gas or oil, plastic bags actually consume less fossil fuels during their lifetime than do compostable plastic and paper bags. Which is fine until you see a dead turtle that has a stomach full of plastic bags - that looked just like jellyfish when they had ceased to be useful to us.
|
|
|
Post by oldnick on Aug 12, 2016 11:11:01 GMT
Edible bags? Feed other species with our waste. I'll make a fortune once I've figured it out. Oops, now I can't patent it. Oh well, my gift to the world... .
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Aug 12, 2016 11:22:09 GMT
From a US environmental website; Plastic bags use 40% less energy to produce and generate 80% less solid waste than paper. Paper bags generate 70% more emissions, and 50 times more water pollutants than plastic bags. Even paper bags made from 100% recycled fibre use more fossil fuels than plastic bags. The item most frequently encountered in landfills is paper—on average, it accounts for more than 40% of a landfill's contents. Newspapers alone take up as much as 13% of landfill space. Plastic bags are extraordinarily energy-efficient to manufacture. Less than .05% of a barrel of oil goes into making all the plastic bags used in the US while 93% - 95% of every barrel of crude oil is burned for fuel and heating purposes. Although they are made from natural gas or oil, plastic bags actually consume less fossil fuels during their lifetime than do compostable plastic and paper bags. You can also add to that list that paper bags are heavier and occupy more volume (flat packed) than plastic bags and hence have a greater environmental impact during transportation. For me it's never been an issue of the carbon footprint with plastic versus paper bags (esp as paper bags are liable to be less prone to sustained reuse); paper is not the alternative. The biggest issue for me with plastic bags as Nick has said is the other environmental impact: marine life being the biggest. The question is not plastic vs paper or even textile. The biggest issue is reuse and eventual disposal of whatever. With an insufficient reuse culture, a tendency to litter and thereby taking items out of a controlled disposal chain, insufficient recycling mentality, and even the controlled disposal mechanisms being inadequate (am I the only one who would like to see an increase in incineration and waste to heat rather than landfill ?) then nudges like the carrier bag tax are a very good thing. But I expect the peak effect to wear off pretty quickly and an increase in the tax being required/implemented.
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,329
Likes: 11,549
|
Post by ilmoro on Aug 12, 2016 11:37:59 GMT
Edible bags? Feed other species with our waste. I'll make a fortune once I've figured it out. Oops, now I can't patent it. Oh well, my gift to the world... . I was going to suggest banana peel as a potential material given Grumps has probably got a plentiful supply but apparently they are an integral part of his beauty regime. www.naturallivingideas.com/banana-peel-uses/Wouldnt want him to have to change his name to OldWarty
|
|
|
Post by oldnick on Aug 12, 2016 12:12:49 GMT
Edible bags? Feed other species with our waste. I'll make a fortune once I've figured it out. Oops, now I can't patent it. Oh well, my gift to the world... . I was going to suggest banana peel as a potential material given Grumps has probably got a plentiful supply but apparently they are an integral part of his beauty regime. www.naturallivingideas.com/banana-peel-uses/Wouldnt want him to have to change his name to OldWarty Of course! Nature's been making edible bags for millenia, let's find a way of putting crisps in potato skins - or does oldgrumpy wear them on his feet?
|
|
oldgrumpy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,087
Likes: 3,233
|
Post by oldgrumpy on Aug 12, 2016 14:08:59 GMT
Edible bags? Feed other species with our waste. I'll make a fortune once I've figured it out. Oops, now I can't patent it. Oh well, my gift to the world... . I was going to suggest banana peel as a potential material given Grumps has probably got a plentiful supply but apparently they are an integral part of his beauty regime. www.naturallivingideas.com/banana-peel-uses/Wouldnt want him to have to change his name to OldWarty Pah!! Even my (boating) mate disses me with something similar (just change the fourth letter) despite my beauty.
|
|
jonno
Member of DD Central
nil satis nisi optimum
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 3,240
|
Post by jonno on Aug 14, 2016 13:10:10 GMT
I was going to suggest banana peel as a potential material given Grumps has probably got a plentiful supply but apparently they are an integral part of his beauty regime. www.naturallivingideas.com/banana-peel-uses/Wouldnt want him to have to change his name to OldWarty Pah!! Even my (boating) mate disses me with something similar (just change the fourth letter) despite my beauty. OK; but isn't wind power eco friendly if not cooped up on a longboat friendly?
|
|
|
Post by oldnick on Aug 14, 2016 13:28:59 GMT
Pah!! Even my (boating) mate disses me with something similar (just change the fourth letter) despite my beauty. OK; but isn't wind power eco friendly if not cooped up on a longboat friendly? www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/methane-vs-carbon-dioxide-a-greenhouse-gas-showdown/"... methane, the gas produced extensively by the livestock industry worldwide, traps up to 100 times more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide within a 5 year period, and 72 times more within a 20 year period. The good news is that methane also leaves the atmosphere within a decade. This makes for a short-lived, but intense climate changer." My name's Nick and I am a short lived but intense climate changer, and I haven't eaten any baked beans today.
|
|
gurberly
Member of DD Central
Posts: 168
Likes: 98
|
Post by gurberly on Aug 23, 2016 8:56:51 GMT
A bit late coming to this one
We had a 4kw system (with immersion diverter/iboost) fitted in June 2015. Cost of install then was £5.8k. Over the last two 12 month periods have averaged 4200kw. We are not fully south facing, probably more SSE.
Hard to quantify savings, but approx. £20 per month off the electricity bill. During the summer months, we have relied solely on the iboost for our hot water to the point where we have turned off the gas boiler between late April and Sept. There are just the two of us, so only a couple of showers per day really…. Most washing up done in the dishwasher… which runs during the day.
System installed by Fenland Solar. Very happy with the install as they went a long way to getting cables hidden under floors etc.
With fuel inflation less than it was, anticipated ROI has changed a bit. If the capital cost of £5.8k had been stuck in Santander compounding at 3% it would take a good many years for the solar investment to return the initial capital and surpass the bank returns….. and the risk is all yours
Hoping for a repeat of the summer of ’76
K
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Aug 23, 2016 20:03:59 GMT
Thanks for all the responses ..I think I'll probably go with a system, since the returns on the 123-account are headed one way, and fuel inflation is likely to head the other way. Won't save the planet, but at least it'll be another tech toy to amuse me, and less capital to park somewhere. I expect that the mark2 system with battery storage, and off-peak top up, will be along too late for my purposes.
|
|
registerme
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 6,437
|
Post by registerme on Aug 23, 2016 22:28:19 GMT
fwiw my experience of EDF's payments is that they have been spotless.
|
|