mnm
Posts: 65
Likes: 16
|
Post by mnm on Sept 1, 2016 21:47:24 GMT
Its “good” a celebrity who cycles has been subject to road rage & has recorded the incident for all to see. Due to Jeremy Vine’s well known name it has reached national news outlets. Perhaps these daily incidents may now be understood a bit more by everyone & taken a bit more seriously. Unfortunately bad stories make the news while follow ups don’t. If anyone hears subsequent news please post here. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-37223235
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2016 8:28:23 GMT
It'll be interesting to see if the threat of physical violence including potential murder will be followed up by the police.
Will the driver, who seems to have anger issues, continue to be allowed to have a car license?
In another article on the BBC on the same day a bike racer was questioned (ie one who races a bike on a track) stated that there was no evidence that helmet cameras are having any affect on improving either cycling or car driving. Well I guess on a track it probably isn't. All we need now is the BBC to understand that organisations like CUK (the old CTC) actually have data on this
|
|
|
Post by martin44 on Sept 2, 2016 9:01:50 GMT
Quite right, i was in the dales yesterday and had to follow 2 cyclist's riding abreast on a winding country lane for over a mile, at no point did they ever consider biking single file to allow me to pass, however, i did grumble a bit, but did not feel the need to beep and indulge in some road rage.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2016 9:40:34 GMT
I guess the issue is should they follow the high way code or not.
Riding two abreast is perfectly specified in the HC except when making a turn. If they were making a turn two abreast they were wrong. If not they were doing what was right. However, I certainly would help a car overtake me in such a position and we will always have bike and car riders who just are dumb.
The trouble about riding along a single width road with cars parked down them is that the HC advises one to allow for numpties opening a car door. When riding you cannot see if there is a numpty in the parked car until you are on the car so you have to ride at least a door width outside the car, plus of course the width of the bike's wiggle movement and look out for pot holes (pot holes for a car are just a pain, for a bike they are very dangerous)
Finally the HC is clear that an overtaking car should give a car's width to over-take a bike.
So, while to some Jeremy's behaviour seems a little odd he is following the basic rules of the road.
Yesterday I had a similar situation of a narrow road with cars down one side and a truck getting frustrated as I worked my way up a hill. (Yes it was in Yorkshire and it was a minor road). Finally he saw a tiny gap and went for it. Terrifying for me as 5 tonnes of truck just missed me, and for what, to get to his site a mere 250m up the road.
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,329
Likes: 11,549
|
Post by ilmoro on Sept 2, 2016 10:07:29 GMT
I guess the issue is should they follow the high way code or not. Riding two abreast is perfectly specified in the HC except when making a turn. If they were making a turn two abreast they were wrong. If not they were doing what was right. However, I certainly would help a car overtake me in such a position and we will always have bike and car riders who just are dumb. The trouble about riding along a single width road with cars parked down them is that the HC advises one to allow for numpties opening a car door. When riding you cannot see if there is a numpty in the parked car until you are on the car so you have to ride at least a door width outside the car, plus of course the width of the bike's wiggle movement and look out for pot holes (pot holes for a car are just a pain, for a bike they are very dangerous) Finally the HC is clear that an overtaking car should give a car's width to over-take a bike. So, while to some Jeremy's behaviour seems a little odd he is following the basic rules of the road. Yesterday I had a similar situation of a narrow road with cars down one side and a truck getting frustrated as I worked my way up a hill. (Yes it was in Yorkshire and it was a minor road). Finally he saw a tiny gap and went for it. Terrifying for me as 5 tonnes of truck just missed me, and for what, to get to his site a mere 250m up the road. At least he didnt sound his klaxon as he passed, which is what often happens to me. Scares the c*** out of me
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Sept 2, 2016 11:36:50 GMT
I don't think it's a good idea for cyclist to cycle down the middle of a one way street effectively blocking cars from passing. Without seeing the specific circumstances I think it would be inappropriate to make a judgement on that. Cyclists have to take a greater responsibility for their own safety because they have to work on the basis that others may not: either through ignorance, oversight, or selfishness. That includes leaving sufficient room or be confident of having sufficient wiggle room for taking avoidance action on potholes and car doors. Amongst other things. My philosophy is that a confident cyclist that takes deliberate action to dominate the road space when it will improve safety is a live cyclist. A timid one may well end up a dead one. I will quite happily deliberately move further out in the road to make my presence greater to prevent someone from trying an overtaking manvouvere where there isn't sufficient space: I've got an uphill climb close to me where there are segments of bollards in the middle of the road. I will typically move further out to prevent an idiot from trying to pass me at those points. ON the other hand I've several times seen my wife being passed with no more than inches to spare in the same place, or start to be overtaken only for the driver to slam on the brakes and pull back in, even though they could have held back for the sake of 5m. Likewise if I think someone is positioning to overtake me on a blind corner (yes that is a frequent occurrence for cyclists) I will move out to discourage it. Likewise in queuing traffic or approaching queing traffic I will move to the middle of the lane. Visibility and blocking. Dominate the road space. Likewise at roundabouts - recently for some reason I stayed in the left of the lane, unlike my normal practise. Car came up alongside, when traffic allowed they set off and cut across me taking me off my bike. I should not have needed to relearn that lesson. Riding two abreast is fine: doing so such as to block traffic behind when there is not a good safety reason is bad form, regardless of what the HC may say on legitimacy. Though I have sympathy when its a larger group as it shortens the overtaking distance for anyone behind, and discourages someone from starting to overtake and then doing an emergency pull over into the middle of the group. Most cyclists are also car drivers and I would hope they try and put themselves in both sets of shoes when on a bike. Most drivers are considerate, but not all are cyclists and don't appreciate the issues. And we all can be susecptible to lapses/oversight. For the car driver its a dent, for a cyclist it can be a lot worse. And don't get me on the subject of cyclists that go up the inside of lorries etc.
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,015
Likes: 5,144
|
Post by adrianc on Sept 2, 2016 14:47:22 GMT
I don't think it's a good idea for cyclist to cycle down the middle of a one way street effectively blocking cars from passing. Tough. The Highway Code says otherwise. Cyclecraft says otherwise. www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0117037400Look at Vine's video, there is nowhere NEAR enough space for a car to pass, so taking the primary position is absolutely the right thing to do, precisely to prevent impatient idiots from trying to squeeze through where it just isn't safe to do so. Vine, otoh, should not have just stopped dead when he got to the wide bit. He should have moved over to let the impatient driver past. Two wrongs made as much of a right as they ever do.
|
|
shimself
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 1,171
|
Post by shimself on Sept 2, 2016 16:39:21 GMT
I don't think it's a good idea for cyclist to cycle down the middle of a one way street effectively blocking cars from passing. As JV said during the argument one shouldn't drive close to the parked cars, and in any case it seemed to me that even if he had been to one side the car didn't have room to pass safely (defined in most of Europe as 1m gap). If it was as narrow as it appeared I'd also say that 20mph would be max safe speed, and a cyclist is probably doing say 15mph, so the car isn't exactly slowed down much. (You might be able to guess I ride a bike into town regularly and have done for 30 years; I managed to get a bus driver prosecuted once when he cut me up-no worse squeezed me into parked cars, when I was doing my level best to go quickly and clear out of his way seeing as he was in such a hurry - I had a passenger as a witness and the £$%^&* magistrates still let the %^&*() off, seeing as he would lose his job and would no longer be able to kill people professionally. rant rant rant)
|
|
ianj
Member of DD Central
Posts: 656
Likes: 520
|
Post by ianj on Sept 2, 2016 16:39:33 GMT
..... i was in the dales yesterday and had to follow 2 cyclist's riding abreast on a winding country lane for over a mile, at no point did they ever consider biking single file to allow me to pass, however, i did grumble a bit, but did not feel the need to beep and indulge in some road rage. While your restraint might be considered noble, I fear it may have only served to encourage future inconsiderate behavior. A little gentle 'encouragement', a gentlemanly toot and a smile, as opposed to 'hand on horn' for 30sec accompanied by loud verbal abuse and much shaking of fists (which should only be considered in extreme cases, and then only when one's own ticker is known to be sound), does no harm, and indicates to usurpers of the Queen's Highway that they are in the presence of a person of grace and refinement who is quite rightly deserving of their every assistance. If only! I guess the issue is should they follow the high way code or not. Riding two abreast is perfectly specified in the HC except when making a turn. If they were making a turn two abreast they were wrong. If not they were doing what was right. Right? Very possibly not. HC Rule 66 states....... ..........' never ride more than two abreast, and ride in single file on narrow or busy roads and when riding round bends.' While cyclists, single and and paired (let's call them the amateurs) seem to have a general awareness of other road users and usually show consideration, my experience of large, 'organised' groups (the professionals) is markedly different. After having lived peacefully, without a 'cyclist problem', for many years in leafy, rural Surrey, I had, following the 2012 Olympics road race, nearly four years of weekends being blighted by phalanxes of 'professional' cycle club enthusiasts, obviously smitten by the rural beauty and the lure of association, who suddenly appeared. Twisting, narrow country lanes, where a single cyclist would cause problems, became roads to avoid between 08:00 - 11:00 weekend mornings. I moved to Scotland three months ago. My response when asked how I'm liking it in Perth, invariably includes the lack of 'professional' cyclists as being high on my list of positives.
|
|
|
Post by martin44 on Sept 2, 2016 21:29:04 GMT
@bobo ... tut tut. naughty man.
|
|
agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,044
Likes: 4,437
|
Post by agent69 on Sept 3, 2016 8:35:41 GMT
It's an unfortunate fact of life that there are lots of a*seholes on the road, and they come attached to varying numbers of wheels.
Whenever I am driving I try to be courteous and if it obvious that the vehicle behind wants to go a lot faster than me then I just let them pass. I wonder what would have happened in this situation if it had been roles reversed? Very slow moving car followed by an impatient man on a cycle. Would the cyclist still have thought there was insufficient space to pass safely, or would he be happy to squeeze past?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2016 8:55:51 GMT
I guess the crtical issue is never ride MORE than 2 abreast Not sure how riding 2 abreast works for overtaking cars on narrow roads (if they have to over take giving a car width). However, it makes complete sense when dealing with on coming traffic on narrow roads. Courtesy is probably the more important thing. I guess I assumed everyone knew the rest of the HC advice, after all you must read it to drive and should read it to ride. The issue of Surrey is pretty interesting. The riding community is split on this one so perhaps I can offer some thoughts. There do appear to be a bunch of people who seem to be experts on their rights in the county and certainly a number of cars and bikes are behaving like A@@@les. (Please, I'm not suggesting that any of the writers here are included in that description). I suspect it is partially due to the large amount of money and the perceived rights that come with owning that getting in the way of common sense and courtesy. It must be hard when sitting on a £10k bike or in a £70k Chelsea Tractor to think, "how can I help someone else"? rather than "this is mine, I have rights".
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,015
Likes: 5,144
|
Post by adrianc on Sept 3, 2016 9:10:57 GMT
It's an unfortunate fact of life that there are lots of a*seholes on the road, and they come attached to varying numbers of wheels. *ding* And, when two of them meet, things kick off. Dashcams and headcams just seem to give the vigilante a sense of invincibility.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2016 9:24:37 GMT
It's an unfortunate fact of life that there are lots of a*seholes on the road, and they come attached to varying numbers of wheels. Whenever I am driving I try to be courteous and if it obvious that the vehicle behind wants to go a lot faster than me then I just let them pass. I wonder what would have happened in this situation if it had been roles reversed? Very slow moving car followed by an impatient man on a cycle. Would the cyclist still have thought there was insufficient space to pass safely, or would he be happy to squeeze past? Interesting point as it happens all the time. These cars keep getting stuck in queues and I have to work out if I should safely squeeze past or just wait behind them. Luckily I tend to ride where there are a host of other routes which I can take, but it makes you think. The other issue is cars don't move steadily, they are always speeding up and slowing down as they inch bumper to bumper along at say 5 mph, you don't know how irritating that is. Just to amuse Time from my house by car to the local shops:20 minutes plus parking time, means 25 minutes door to door Time from my house to local shops:15 minutes door to door
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,329
Likes: 11,549
|
Post by ilmoro on Sept 3, 2016 10:41:21 GMT
|
|