blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Apr 3, 2018 18:23:40 GMT
No, it's not all right for 98. The details button for 98 takes me to the details of 99, as does the button for 99. It's a bug (delicious).
|
|
toast
Member of DD Central
Posts: 158
Likes: 90
|
Post by toast on Apr 3, 2018 18:24:40 GMT
ablrate , I just noticed a small bug: I have two entries on the "Bids on New Loans" page (NewUI/Lender/Dashboard/Active/Proposed.aspx). If I click the 'Details' button for the first entry, then it shows me details pertaining to the second entry. The 'Details' button for the second entry correctly shows information about the second entry. It all looks fine to me!  I logged out and back in again and the problem is still present for me. The only thing I can think of that I might have done different to you is that my first item was built from two separate pledges (I lent some money, then lent a little more later on) - perhaps that triggers it?
|
|
toast
Member of DD Central
Posts: 158
Likes: 90
|
Post by toast on Apr 3, 2018 18:27:15 GMT
No, it's not all right for 98. The details button for 98 takes me to the details of 99, as does the button for 99. It's a bug (delicious). Our previous posts crossed, but I have the reverse situation: my 99 (top entry) shows me the info for 98.
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Apr 3, 2018 18:36:43 GMT
Aha! It's not a number thing, its a row thing. The details button on the first row takes you to the information for the second row. The second row is ok. I have four accounts to play with and one is like yours, depending presumably on which you bid on first. So a coding error on the first row. No charge, ablrate . Free technical support as well as free advice.  Could any platform have more helpful lenders?
|
|
|
|
Post by ablrate on Apr 17, 2018 17:00:38 GMT
Thanks all - have passed these on - you should see updates on suggestions soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by ablrate on Apr 23, 2018 11:07:56 GMT
Hi all
Sent a mail. Ablrate will be down for a short period as the security certificate is being updated. There is a requirement for the severs to restarted multiple times. We have just had a call saying from our providers saying they are just beginning so it shouldn't be too long before we are back.
|
|
nick
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,056 
Likes: 825
|
Post by nick on May 17, 2018 17:37:33 GMT
I've just discovered, to my cost, that when buying from the SM the "Secondary Market Trade Summary" does not necessarily quote the price you will pay. The price you will pay is the best available price at the time the trade is processed through the system so, if someone cancels their offer in the time between you checking all four check boxes, hitting the execute button, and the request being received in the database then you may get a different price to the one you were quoted. A simple example: there are two offers for £100, one at 100%, one at 101%. You enter £100 and hit the buy button and you are quoted a price of 100%. If the offer at 100% cancels before your trade hits the database then you'll be charged 101%. I assume the same is true on a sell trade. Anyone else noticed this? Is this a bug or feature, and would I have recourse to ablrate ? Edit: on FS when someone has removed their offer or another buyer has beaten you to it you receive an error message - I can't remember the wording but something along the lines that the amount is not available to purchase. I guess on FS you have to purchase separately at each discount/premium whereas on ABL you can purchase from across multiple discounts/premia. I will look at this. It would make sense to error the trade if you can't get the price quoted.. leave it with us. Regards Ablrate - this still seems to be an issue. Last week I noticed that a SM purchase I made went through at a significantly higher price than the price quoted. Fortunately the absolute amount involved wasn't worth following up, but it has made me wonder how many previous purchases I've made haven been executed at the quoted price (I naively assumed the quoted price is the price executed so haven't been routinely checking all my purchases, until now). The system should recheck the validity of the quoted price should on final confirmation and busted if it has moved rather than allowing execution at a different price.
|
|
|
|
Post by ablrate on May 18, 2018 14:09:51 GMT
I will review this with developers again. I understood that to be fixed.
|
|
|
|
Post by ablrate on May 24, 2018 16:45:56 GMT
I will look at this. It would make sense to error the trade if you can't get the price quoted.. leave it with us. Regards Ablrate - this still seems to be an issue. Last week I noticed that a SM purchase I made went through at a significantly higher price than the price quoted. Fortunately the absolute amount involved wasn't worth following up, but it has made me wonder how many previous purchases I've made haven been executed at the quoted price (I naively assumed the quoted price is the price executed so haven't been routinely checking all my purchases, until now). The system should recheck the validity of the quoted price should on final confirmation and busted if it has moved rather than allowing execution at a different price. I can confirm that this has now been fixed. You will see the following warnings if it happens to you: When selling: "The target bid has been updated/hit before the sale could be initiated. Please close the popup and try again!" When buying: "The target offer has been updated/sold before the purchase could be initiated. Please close the popup and try again!"
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on May 24, 2018 17:26:15 GMT
This is good progress and appreciated. However, you are still generating tax statements for ISA accounts as if they were ordinary accounts, without a word of warning that the statement is for a tax free account. People should not be so stupid as to pay it, but should you be suggesting that they should declare it? Not a difficult fix.
|
|
|
|
Post by westcountry on Jul 18, 2018 9:46:14 GMT
ablrate, please could there be an additional column in the Secondary market loan listings, showing the Creditsafe company rating (the number, not the A to E category) please? This would make it much easier to check for any changes to this, instead of having to open up all the loans I'm invested in and then open their company trading reports.
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Jul 18, 2018 10:30:57 GMT
Nice idea but personally not so keen. This would be mixing two types of information, factual information about trading opportunities, and one element of third party evaluations of the company. There would have to be some words of explanation about that, and the various caveats and disclaimers, on the SM page.
|
|
|
|
Post by ablrate on Jul 18, 2018 11:34:45 GMT
ablrate , please could there be an additional column in the Secondary market loan listings, showing the Creditsafe company rating (the number, not the A to E category) please? This would make it much easier to check for any changes to this, instead of having to open up all the loans I'm invested in and then open their company trading reports. We will have a look at that.. its a dynamic number so we have to be careful about load etc...
|
|
elliotn
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,064
Likes: 2,681
|
Post by elliotn on Jul 18, 2018 12:19:19 GMT
Or an alert notification as being put in place for new admin/docs updates?
Edit - with an option for all or invested only loans.
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Jul 18, 2018 12:55:34 GMT
Optional alerts would be good.
|
|
Could any platform have more helpful lenders?
