n
Member of DD Central
Yet another Nick
Posts: 880 
Likes: 461
|
Post by n on Nov 29, 2018 13:43:21 GMT
Platform may be intermittently unavailable, just uploading the accrued int fix. Thanks ablrate , some useful platform fixes in recent days. Could you possibly please give your developers another prod to change the default "Records per page" view setting from 10 loans to at least 50 loans per page (ie. the middle option on the drop-down, not the smallest). But there are only 4 more loans to go before there are more than 50 so wouldn't it be better to be asking for at least 100?
Of course that is assuming all the bad loans don't get sorted out in the mean time. And then there's the bit-coin-chain thing when we get to see all the loans on the planet?
In all seriousness though I too find it excruciatingly annoying to have to click 'All' every time I re-open my browser (although not as annoying as having to re-enter my bank details for every withdrawal on AC).
|
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Nov 29, 2018 14:31:08 GMT
Should not be beyond the wit of man to remember the setting in a cookie (that's what the &&&^ things are for, not for tracking which websites you went to this month). But yeah 'all' works for me, until or unless there are megabytes of loans (show all on FC, for instance, might be a bit OTT).
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Nov 29, 2018 15:50:33 GMT
If this were FC we would not be listing the loans - even if we wanted to.
This 10 default is a pain for me, every time I log in.
|
|
|
|
Post by ablrate on Jan 23, 2019 9:38:33 GMT
We have changed a couple of things:
Portfolio Loans can now be seen in your Current Investment under the 'Portfolio Loans' link.
Repayments have now been changed to reflect what you have actually been paid and change to what you will be paid as you buy and sell the loans.
|
|
mw
Member of DD Central
Posts: 184
Likes: 83
|
Post by mw on Jan 23, 2019 10:26:14 GMT
On my due payments page it has overdue payments all set to -£2.00 instead of what they were.
|
|
des
Posts: 119
Likes: 78
|
Post by des on Jan 23, 2019 11:33:59 GMT
On my due payments page it has overdue payments all set to -£2.00 instead of what they were. Same here ablrate
|
|
|
|
Post by ablrate on Jan 23, 2019 11:43:42 GMT
hmmm can you DM me your username and we will look into it. Or email info@ablrate
|
|
mw
Member of DD Central
Posts: 184
Likes: 83
|
Post by mw on Jan 23, 2019 12:34:40 GMT
hmmm can you DM me your username and we will look into it. Or email info@ablrate Have sent over an email.
|
|
n
Member of DD Central
Yet another Nick
Posts: 880
Likes: 461
|
Post by n on Jan 23, 2019 12:38:01 GMT
Mine say 'Not Paid', but I didn't look earlier.
|
|
brush
Member of DD Central
Posts: 174
Likes: 154
|
Post by brush on Jan 23, 2019 13:49:25 GMT
- £2.00 earlier now marked as not paid.
|
|
mw
Member of DD Central
Posts: 184
Likes: 83
|
Post by mw on Jan 23, 2019 14:43:34 GMT
hmmm can you DM me your username and we will look into it. Or email info@ablrate Have sent over an email. All good now thanks ablrate
|
|
ganymede
Member of DD Central
Posts: 304
Likes: 211
|
Post by ganymede on Jan 23, 2019 16:33:16 GMT
I hate the changes made by ablrate, putting paid and not paid in payment due and under loan repayments is a basic bad idea, hiding any number you might want to reference is just basically wrong, especially with some of the loanswhere payment adjustment have been made so instead of the £xx.xx we have part payment and shifted the residual to the next month have the two options paid/not paid come up at some point we have lost the loan information. I don't like this tampering with displayed numbers.
It's not fixed I still see -£2.00 with the old interface, and the new interface is still call the new beta interface when switching.
IF IT'S NOT BROKEN DON'T FIX IT
|
|
ianj
Member of DD Central
Posts: 656
Likes: 520
|
Post by ianj on Jan 24, 2019 11:47:51 GMT
<Repayments have now been changed to reflect what you have actually been paid> So, the change made to All Due Payments>Payment Amount requires that I have to interrogate future repayment details (with non-payment potential) in order to guage what I should have received with regard to payments already missed.
Good Idea?  Doesn't press any buttons for me, but who am I to say. Guess you've been inundated with requests for this 'improvement'!
|
|
|
|
Post by ablrate on Jan 24, 2019 12:16:38 GMT
The issue is that the system was changing all payments to whatever amount was due on what you currently held, not on what you had actually been paid. It didn't change on the basis of what is being bought and sold.
This is also part of the ability to accurately calculate your yield on ablate, which we are looking to include on a new statistics page, which will include what is behind and what payment you are due etc. We don'#t always get it right, but we aim to change things when suggestions come in that make things more accurate or transparent. If you have a suggestion please do email us and let us know and we will take a look at implementing it.
|
|
ianj
Member of DD Central
Posts: 656
Likes: 520
|
Post by ianj on Jan 24, 2019 13:14:53 GMT
The issue is that the system was changing all payments to whatever amount was due on what you currently held, not on what you had actually been paid. It didn't change on the basis of what is being bought and sold. This is also part of the ability to accurately calculate your yield on ablate, which we are looking to include on a new statistics page, which will include what is behind and what payment you are due etc. We don'#t always get it right, but we aim to change things when suggestions come in that make things more accurate or transparent. If you have a suggestion please do email us and let us know and we will take a look at implementing it. OK. The fact that I only very infrequently use the SM probably accounts for my lack of appreciation of potential inaccuarcies in reporting. If I have a correct understanding of what you say above, accurate missed payment data will be available following a future system update. Probably me being somewhat thick, but I didn't extract that information from yesterday's 'change' post. I'll go and hide now. 
|
|
