benaj
Member of DD Central
N/A
Posts: 5,560 
Likes: 1,725
|
Post by benaj on Aug 7, 2024 15:31:44 GMT
Can digital content creators be kids’ role models? 🤔 May be. Definitely much better than those involved in the “pig butchering” scams. Some even speaks in our prestigious university after quitting the not-so-glamorous industry and found an online fashion business. youtu.be/SOa2gxHnLdQ |
|
agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,018
Likes: 4,421
|
Post by agent69 on Aug 7, 2024 15:45:16 GMT
3. If allowed to return would the media make her a celebrity from which she would benefit and profit? This one clinches it for me, because I think this would be the case. So she must stay where she is as far as I am concerned. We all know that celebrities however minor get away with things the rest of us would be arrested for and if the courts punish them their "supporters/ followers" etc claim they are being picked on. I saw a post the other day that was a wonderful example it was a comment on an article about an arrest warrant being issued for Katie Price for not turning up in court as ordered the comment was on the lines of "don't these stupid judges live in the real world, Katie is a great mum and role model, she has gone away to work to earn money to support her family just like anyone else would and they wouldn't go to court either" A great role model :- 5 kids 3 different fathers Made her money by "modelling" and still does onlyfansBankrupt twice Caught drink or drug driving several times, also driving whilst disqualified and no insurance Many plastic surgery ops Now considering non-sexual escorting to help ends meet. Can you imagine the small talk if you were mad enough to pay to take her out for dinner?
|
|
agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,018
Likes: 4,421
|
Post by agent69 on Aug 7, 2024 15:53:33 GMT
😅 The UK courts must have been busy this summer. “The most dangerous” woman has her citizenship revoked and lost her appeal, and yet we are still facing national threat. Now the question, could she claim asylum anywhere on this planet I thought she was entitled to Dutch citizenship by virtue of being married to a Dutchman.
As an aside, I thought part of the problem was that when she was 'liberated' from Isis she showed little remorse for her earlier actions.
|
|
keitha
Member of DD Central
2024, hopefully the year I get out of P2P
Posts: 4,566
Likes: 2,610
|
Post by keitha on Aug 7, 2024 16:19:54 GMT
We all know that celebrities however minor get away with things the rest of us would be arrested for and if the courts punish them their "supporters/ followers" etc claim they are being picked on. I saw a post the other day that was a wonderful example it was a comment on an article about an arrest warrant being issued for Katie Price for not turning up in court as ordered the comment was on the lines of "don't these stupid judges live in the real world, Katie is a great mum and role model, she has gone away to work to earn money to support her family just like anyone else would and they wouldn't go to court either" A great role model :- 5 kids 3 different fathers Made her money by "modelling" and still does onlyfansBankrupt twice Caught drink or drug driving several times, also driving whilst disqualified and no insurance Many plastic surgery ops Now considering non-sexual escorting to help ends meet. Can you imagine the small talk if you were mad enough to pay to take her out for dinner?
I wouldn't pay to have that "on my Arm" nor would money change hands for sex - Unless she paid me !!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Aug 7, 2024 16:22:55 GMT
😅 The UK courts must have been busy this summer. “The most dangerous” woman has her citizenship revoked and lost her appeal, and yet we are still facing national threat. Now the question, could she claim asylum anywhere on this planet I thought she was entitled to Dutch citizenship by virtue of being married to a Dutchman.
As an aside, I thought part of the problem was that when she was 'liberated' from Isis she showed little remorse for her earlier actions.
her son would have have that entitlement but has since died. I don't believe - but could be wrong - that she was entitled to it through marriage. Originally one of the grounds given by the government for removing her British Citizenship was that she had also had Bangledeshi citizenship as well, and therefore the action would not make her stateless. But she had never been there and hadn't taken up such citizenship, and I recall Bangladesh contradicting it. Anyway, any entitlement that there was to take it up has now lapsed due to age and it not having been taken up by the cutoff. Regardless, given that she was born in this country and only actually held British Citizenship, was groomed by ISIS while she was in this country, left from this country (when 15?) should it not be our responsibility to deal with her rather than pass the buck onto another? I know its not a popular view.
|
|
|
|
Post by bernythedolt on Aug 7, 2024 16:23:24 GMT
Now considering non-sexual escorting to help ends meet. Can you imagine the small talk if you were mad enough to pay to take her out for dinner?
I wouldn't pay to have that "on my Arm" nor would money change hands for sex - Unless she paid me !!!! I admire your spirit, keitha, but I think you're probably safe 
|
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Aug 7, 2024 16:23:46 GMT
yes we have. More than once I think. And FWIW, I don't think anyone's views have changed
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,919
Likes: 5,107
|
Post by adrianc on Aug 7, 2024 16:55:28 GMT
I thought she was entitled to Dutch citizenship by virtue of being married to a Dutchman. I don't believe - but could be wrong - that she was entitled to it through marriage. She would have needed to be living with the Dutch national for three continuous years. Marriage is not necessary, just the relationship. ind.nl/en/exceptions-to-the-5-year-term-for-naturalisation-in-the-netherlandsAt the time of her 2015 marriage, she was under the Dutch minimum marriage age, so it would not have been recognised. Even if the relationship became recognised once she was of age, it's unlikely they lived together for three years. They would also have needed to be living together throughout the nationalisation process. By early 2019, they were not living together, and haven't done since.
|
|
baboonery
Member of DD Central
Posts: 64
Likes: 51
|
Post by baboonery on Aug 7, 2024 17:51:44 GMT
I thought she was entitled to Dutch citizenship by virtue of being married to a Dutchman.
As an aside, I thought part of the problem was that when she was 'liberated' from Isis she showed little remorse for her earlier actions.
her son would have have that entitlement but has since died. I don't believe - but could be wrong - that she was entitled to it through marriage. Originally one of the grounds given by the government for removing her British Citizenship was that she had also had Bangledeshi citizenship as well, and therefore the action would not make her stateless. But she had never been there and hadn't taken up such citizenship, and I recall Bangladesh contradicting it. Anyway, any entitlement that there was to take it up has now lapsed due to age and it not having been taken up by the cutoff. Regardless, given that she was born in this country and only actually held British Citizenship, was groomed by ISIS while she was in this country, left from this country (when 15?) should it not be our responsibility to deal with her rather than pass the buck onto another?I know its not a popular view. This^
|
|
|
|
Post by captainconfident on Aug 7, 2024 23:14:52 GMT
I had to look it up, but apparently that Yvette Cooper is the Home Secretary. She should step in now and let the Begum come home and have a trial.
|
|
