Please tick the box to confirm you are not a robot.

cooling_dude,

If I'm right in my opinion of where the law stands, everything I've written is most certainly relevant. It's only irrelevant if I'm wrong, and no one has seriously argued that I am - merely spouted nonsense, and/or accused me of self interest (amongst other things). Well, it was self-interest that caused all the complaints against bots to be made, was it not?

As I have said before, serious investors will look at the way the secondary market currently works as an absolute joke. It almost certainly breaches equalities legislation, and wastes a vast amount of people's time in the process.

If prefunding is good enough for the primary market, logically, there's no reason why it should not be used on the secondary market. A queued system would level the playing field and give everyone an equal opportunity to participate.

Bearing in mind that the vast majority of users don't frequent this forum, or bother with the secondary market in its current form, do you really think the majority of users would vote against queued prefunding? I don't... Oh wait, maybe it's the voice of self-interest I hear speaking, shouting, insulting me, accusing me of trolling and uttering irrelevancies.

D**e was doing Ok until required to guess what a yankee might think a pancake looks like. 8>.

Shame we can't filter/block other users posts, I'm seeing too many sunspots ,)

Thanks again, GSV3MiaC ... just saw your reply on the FC board.

Should solve the sunspot problem ,)

vmail: the forum rules apply to all. I've edited your post. Be careful.